I was able to spend a few moments at BRU this afternoon, together with my 3,5 year old daughter. Her eyesight is much better than mine and furthermore she screams from the top of her lungs as soon as she sees something moving on the airport. So nothing at BRU goes unnoticed to me, as long as my daughter is standing next to me. 8)
A rare looking B767(?) is parked at Sabena Technics H41 with light and dark blue markings on a white tail.
To my great surprise I noticed that a new parking lot has been built, next to the passenger terminal access road and close to the satellite. I guess this parking lot will be used for airline and airport staff. Somehow this concrete wall reminds me of its bigger brother in Israel, that keeps the Jews and Palestines out of each other's hair. I guess here the concrete is necessary to protect the parked cars from the occasional jet blast. Unfortunately this wall is now blocking some of the view.
Further on some other construction works are still under way, probably the modification of some RWY 20/02 taxiways.
It looks like the extension of the EAT building 2-3 will be finalised quite soon. This investment may now perhaps taste rather sour to DHL. According to some newspaper article, half of the EAT staff is expected to be laid off in some years time, but here you have now enlarged and modernised maintenance facilities!
Due to the ungoing social unrest among DHL staff at BRU, the DHL management had decided to relocate a great deal of the BRU traffic to other airports. You may know how the DHL ramp looks like on a normal Sunday afternoon, namely cramped with yellow and white planes. This is how it looked like today. One could expect a Kalitta 747 on Sunday afternoon, however today this one did not show up either. Edited correction: the Kalitta 747 did show up today!
Around 15:00 RWY 25R became closed for normal operations in order to calibrate the 25R ILS system. I was surprised to see how the calibrating aircraft had to perform that many (large) circuits. A few times the aircraft flew over the whole length of the runway, however most of the times it broke off its approach procedure even before reaching the treshold.
Due to the RWY 25R closure, all landing traffic was guided to 25L and departing traffic had to take RWY 20. This led to considerable delays. The SQ 744F below had to land on RWY 25L. I believe it reached its position at Brucargo only 20-25 minutes later. Taxiing took up a lot of time, however it also had to wait a considerable amount of time before it could cross RWY 25R, due to the ongoing calibrating flights and an odd departure of the BR MD11 on 25R.
I believe the yellow BIAC car is a 'FOLLOW ME' vehicle. Is there really a need for such a 'follow me' service at BRU, as the BRU infrastructure does not seem to be very complex or confusing? Is there a need for a 'follow me' car when there is no problem with visibility whatsoever? The 'follow me' car was sitting idle on the Brucargo ramp for about half an hour, as long is took for the SQ 744F to reach its position. Finally it seemed that the only purpose of the 'follow me' car was to give an indication to the SQ 744F of where the aircraft had to finally turn right. This looks like a rather expensive and perhaps not so useful service to me. Is it the airline that requests such a service or is it BIAC that imposes it?
Thanks for any additional comments.
Established02