Lufthansa today revealed its future livery: https://www.aviation24.be/airlines/lufth ... ansa-2018/
.

Moderator: Latest news team

Not very controversial indeed, but then isn't that exactly the profile of Lufthansa?
Actually, No, I dont think it looks ‘80s. I thought it was rather timeless. Just a small yellow cheatline would have been enough to accentuate and make it less dullInquirer wrote: 02 Feb 2018, 09:27
Yellow is a Lufthansa accent colour indeed, but looking at their planes they do look 1980s, don't you agree?
Besides, I heart every colour adds costs, so them letting go of yellow and gray probably saves them a small fortune.
It certainly looked the same for a long time, so in that sense, yes, it was 'timeless', but let's think it over: a corporate logo put up against a bright encircled background: isn't that pretty much thé design trend of the 1980s?sean1982 wrote: 02 Feb 2018, 09:42 Actually, No, I dont think it looks ‘80s. I thought it was rather timeless.
Euh, you mean a stripe along the fuselage right?sean1982 wrote: 02 Feb 2018, 09:42Just a small yellow cheatline would have been enough to accentuate and make it less dull
There is at least one other colour. The blue is not uniform, but a mixture of different shades (50 shades of blue?). Thus the cost argument is not valid.Inquirer wrote: 02 Feb 2018, 11:21 Another colour would probably have added costs and not a cent in extra revenue.

That wouldn’t work with the new generation of aircraft, like the A350 and B787.FLYAIR10 wrote: 02 Feb 2018, 17:11 In my view the 'new' LH livery is a dull and boring one. If it would be a cost saving measure by leaving out the more lively yellow,why didn't they go for the all metal fuselage like in the past and only paint the tail? That would for sure save a lot more money.
Cx (Cathay Pacific) used to have a full metal colour scheme. They ditched it because the white and other colours where weighing less than the blank varnish they needed to protect the metal from adverse conditions.KriVa wrote: 02 Feb 2018, 20:07That wouldn’t work with the new generation of aircraft, like the A350 and B787.FLYAIR10 wrote: 02 Feb 2018, 17:11 In my view the 'new' LH livery is a dull and boring one. If it would be a cost saving measure by leaving out the more lively yellow,why didn't they go for the all metal fuselage like in the past and only paint the tail? That would for sure save a lot more money.
Also, I think a lot of people still relate bare metal fuselages to American Airlines, even though it has been quite a while since they changed their livery.
Why would the cost argument not be valid?sn26567 wrote: 02 Feb 2018, 13:55There is at least one other colour. The blue is not uniform, but a mixture of different shades (50 shades of blue?). Thus the cost argument is not valid.Inquirer wrote: 02 Feb 2018, 11:21 Another colour would probably have added costs and not a cent in extra revenue.