Iran Air direct to BRU from July 9th

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

capetown
Posts: 264
Joined: 02 May 2007, 14:31
Location: Brussels

Iran Air direct to BRU from July 9th

Post by capetown »

Hi,
quite great news just in :P - read it on the Iranian News Agency www.irna.ir :
Iran Air to launch direct flights to Brussels Brussels, May 22, IRNA
Belgium-Iran-air link
The national carrier of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Iran Air, will launch a direct flight from Tehran to Brussels from 9 July, Iran Air told IRNA Tuesday.

Initially there will be two flights a month. One flight will be direct Tehran-Brussels and the other will be Tehran to Brussels via the German city of Cologne.

Iran Air will deploy an Airbus 300 on the route to Brussels, said the official.

winglets
Posts: 84
Joined: 19 Aug 2003, 00:00
Location: EBKT

Post by winglets »


User avatar
Atlantis
Posts: 5572
Joined: 12 Apr 2005, 00:00

Post by Atlantis »

Two flights a MONTH is a little bit weird, isn't it?

I hope this is true because the direct flights to Tehran is already four years old.

capetown
Posts: 264
Joined: 02 May 2007, 14:31
Location: Brussels

Post by capetown »

Atlantis wrote:Two flights a MONTH is a little bit weird, isn't it?

I hope this is true because the direct flights to Tehran is already four years old.
I agree - not exactly what you call a high frequency route (and only one flight a month is non-stop, the other making a stop in Cologne). Nevertheless, a quote from an airline official to the national news agency seems more reliable to me than the previous rumours about this flight (I remember the Iranian ambassador to Belgium and the EU having said something in this respect about a year ago or so) ... As to the frequency - not sure whether Iran Air has sufficient fleet capacity at its disposal to fly the route a couple of times a week let's say ...

spotter1102

Post by spotter1102 »

It great news !!! :D :D

But it's strange to see only 2 flights a month ?

spotter1102

Post by spotter1102 »

capetown wrote:
Atlantis wrote:Two flights a MONTH is a little bit weird, isn't it?

I hope this is true because the direct flights to Tehran is already four years old.
I agree - not exactly what you call a high frequency route (and only one flight a month is non-stop, the other making a stop in Cologne). Nevertheless, a quote from an airline official to the national news agency seems more reliable to me than the previous rumours about this flight (I remember the Iranian ambassador to Belgium and the EU having said something in this respect about a year ago or so) ... As to the frequency - not sure whether Iran Air has sufficient fleet capacity at its disposal to fly the route a couple of times a week let's say ...
I have count on airliners.net that Iran Air has 5 Airbus A300 flying to Dubai, Stockholm, Hamburg, already Cologne and domestic flights into Iran.

User avatar
Skystef
Posts: 2014
Joined: 13 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Near 25R/EBBR
Contact:

Post by Skystef »

Atlantis wrote:Two flights a MONTH is a little bit weird, isn't it?
Cubana started back in 1985 two flights/month on Havana, the service lasted almost 14 years (frequency was of course raised).

So a very wise decision of Iran Air on a market that has to be prospected.

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Post by SN30952 »

Skystef wrote:
Atlantis wrote:Two flights a MONTH is a little bit weird, isn't it?
So a very wise decision of Iran Air on a market that has to be prospected.
Yes, but there are better ways than to travel in an aging A300, Stef....
Skystef wrote:Cubana started back in 1985 two flights/month on Havana, the service lasted almost 14 years (frequency was of course raised).
News from those is like news from el lider: the shorter the better. :lol:
El lider needed money, so the dictator sold his beaches. I do not see his iranian homonym doing that.

spotter1102

Post by spotter1102 »

Skystef wrote:
Atlantis wrote:Two flights a MONTH is a little bit weird, isn't it?
Cubana started back in 1985 two flights/month on Havana, the service lasted almost 14 years (frequency was of course raised).

So a very wise decision of Iran Air on a market that has to be prospected.
Cubana flew into BRU with Tupolev Tu-154 ?

Ilyushin
Posts: 19
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 00:00

Post by Ilyushin »

Cubana flew into BRU with Tupolev Tu-154 ?
Cubana flew the Ilyushin Il-62M into BRU and during the last years of this service with some DC-10's of AOM.

Regards

Jan

spotter1102

Post by spotter1102 »

Ilyushin wrote:
Cubana flew into BRU with Tupolev Tu-154 ?
Cubana flew the Ilyushin Il-62M into BRU and during the last years of this service with some DC-10's of AOM.

Regards

Jan
Thanks for info :D :D

chunk
Posts: 764
Joined: 07 May 2004, 00:00
Location: Scotland usually

Post by chunk »

SN30952 wrote:Yes, but there are better ways than to travel in an aging A300,
Ain't that the truth. WHy would anyone get on that when they could go on A KL 330 from AMS, an AF 340 from CDG, A BA or Lufthansa airbus. Book far in advacne you would even get a decent price....

User avatar
BrightCedars
Posts: 848
Joined: 01 Sep 2005, 00:00
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Post by BrightCedars »

Maybe a weekly or 2-weekly routing THR-DAM-BRU together with RB would be more in line with their political guidelines than RB's current DAM-BEY-BRU.

b720
Posts: 908
Joined: 04 May 2006, 00:00

Post by b720 »

Heard that RB is not doing that badly on the dam-bey-bru route..for all pax departing bru to bey or dam this is the only direct flight... it takes 4 hours to bey..next best alternative at least 7 hours with equipment change..second security check at transit point etc..a nightmare..

capetown
Posts: 264
Joined: 02 May 2007, 14:31
Location: Brussels

Post by capetown »

b720 wrote:Heard that RB is not doing that badly on the dam-bey-bru route..for all pax departing bru to bey or dam this is the only direct flight... it takes 4 hours to bey..next best alternative at least 7 hours with equipment change..second security check at transit point etc..a nightmare..
Could you reveal sth. about your source ? I remember rumours last year (and there should even be a post somewhere on this forum) that RB considered leaving BRU ... ?

teach
Posts: 740
Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 00:00

Post by teach »

WHy would anyone get on that when they could go on A KL 330 from AMS, an AF 340 from CDG, A BA or Lufthansa airbus.
Because 95% of travellers have no idea what plane they're flying on, or simply don't care. Plus, Iran Air's A300-600s are not that old at all, they're from the mid 1990s. They're about the same age as SN's A330s.

teach
Posts: 740
Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 00:00

Post by teach »

According to Luchtvaartnieuws.nl the flight will not be twice monthly but twice weekly, which seems a lot more plausible.

chunk
Posts: 764
Joined: 07 May 2004, 00:00
Location: Scotland usually

Post by chunk »

teach wrote:
WHy would anyone get on that when they could go on A KL 330 from AMS, an AF 340 from CDG, A BA or Lufthansa airbus.
Because 95% of travellers have no idea what plane they're flying on, or simply don't care. Plus, Iran Air's A300-600s are not that old at all, they're from the mid 1990s. They're about the same age as SN's A330s.
You think so? Ask the people that take flights to Tehran from the likes of DXB, KWI or BAH. You will find that the much preferred option is to go EK, KU, GF, QR or frankly almost anyone other than Iran Air. Iran Air get the passengers that can't either can't afford tickets on the other carriers or have no alternative 'cos the others are full.

Thats what my Iranian friends in the Gulf tell me anyway....

As for them not being that old....certainly true and I am sure they are safe enough but HOW sure can you be. The sanctions on Iran are about to get even more restrictive in all likelihood thanks to the nuclear standoff and though Iranians are experts at keeping planes in the air these sanctions are going to affect them even more.

Not sure how putting the lives of civilian passengers in danger because of political maneuvering on both sides helps anybody's position but there ya go. That's why I am not a politician I guess.

All I'm saying is that I wouldn't be keen to get on one of these birds unless I was being forced.....

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Post by SN30952 »

chunk wrote:All I'm saying is that I wouldn't be keen to get on one of these birds unless I was being forced.....
out of Iran. :lol:
But do not mistake it is Mahair that is flying the oldies of THAI.
IranAir has a quite healthy report.
Iran Tours, that's something else, although an Iran Air subsidiary.
The only IR-disaster I remember, was IR655 shot down by the U.S. Navy guided missile cruiser USS Vincennes.
On a Sunday in July 1988, just befor the 4th.....
That was (is) in the time the US Navy could not make the difference between an A300 and an attacking military fighter.

teach
Posts: 740
Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 00:00

Post by teach »

Ask the people that take flights to Tehran from the likes of DXB, KWI or BAH. You will find that the much preferred option is to go EK, KU, GF, QR or frankly almost anyone other than Iran Air.
Perfectly possible.

But trust me, it's not because they fly A300s...

Post Reply