El Al will choose A330 for replacement B767

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

User avatar
Atlantis
Posts: 5276
Joined: 12 Apr 2005, 00:00

El Al will choose A330 for replacement B767

Post by Atlantis »

This is a surprise!! El Al is a loyal Boeing client but nevertheless they choose 7 A330's for the replacement of the B767.

This is good news for Airbus, but also good for us, spotters, to see an EL Al A330 at BRU.

Source: Luchtvaartnieuws.

smokejumper
Posts: 1033
Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:00
Location: Northern Virginia USA

Post by smokejumper »

The US Government has been (perhaps) the staunchest supporter of Israel since its’ founding in 1948. This support (defense, political, emotional and, financial) has been at great financial expense and has negatively affected US-Arab relationships.

The cost of this support has been underwritten by the US taxpayer. Orders placed by El Al have contributed to the wages of US workers, who in turn, have paid taxes on their income that was used to contribute to Israel’s support.

Question: If El Al buys planes made elsewhere, will the taxpayers of the producing nations now relieve the US taxpayer of this cost and directly contribute to Israel?

SAS_MD80
Posts: 78
Joined: 12 Jun 2005, 00:00

Post by SAS_MD80 »

Frankly, I don't see why they should.
Chris

User avatar
TexasGuy
Posts: 669
Joined: 15 Apr 2006, 00:00
Location: Houston, Texas

Post by TexasGuy »

huh?
Theres nothing better than slow cooked fall off the bone BBQ, Texas style

JDarby
Posts: 102
Joined: 12 Jul 2004, 00:00
Location: Toronto, Canada

Post by JDarby »

1- LY is now a private company.
2- What would you do if someone offered you A330 for just over $60 m?

smokejumper
Posts: 1033
Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:00
Location: Northern Virginia USA

Post by smokejumper »

I'd buy it straight away, but I'd also be mindful of which side my bread is buttered on! There's an old saying, "Don't bite the hand that feeds you."

chunk
Posts: 764
Joined: 07 May 2004, 00:00
Location: Scotland usually

Post by chunk »

There are a couple of things here - the fac that the company is private is big. Perhaps the newly privatised company is trying to make a point that it is independent and able to make its own decisions. Secondly - if you have an urgent need for new planes and you have a choice between waiting until 2010 at least for an unproven plane (787) or a prove performer in a two year time frame at a great price - what would you do?

That said I will not believe it until the planes are in Tel Aviv with El Al colours.....

User avatar
TexasGuy
Posts: 669
Joined: 15 Apr 2006, 00:00
Location: Houston, Texas

Post by TexasGuy »

JDarby wrote:1- LY is now a private company.
2- What would you do if someone offered you A330 for just over $60 m?
Considering what it is in copetition with, I would ask LOTS of questions...


....
Theres nothing better than slow cooked fall off the bone BBQ, Texas style

JDarby
Posts: 102
Joined: 12 Jul 2004, 00:00
Location: Toronto, Canada

Post by JDarby »

I agree with you Somkejumper & TexasGuy, but as chunk said, they needed the planes right away.

chunk, please don't start favoring what will become very soon a piece of junk (A330) over the state of the art technology (B787)

User avatar
sn26567
Posts: 41027
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: Rosières/Rozieren, Belgium
Contact:

Post by sn26567 »

chunk wrote:That said I will not believe it until the planes are in Tel Aviv with El Al colours.....
Also my opinion: there will be a lot of water flowing under the bridges before an Airbus sports the El Al colours. Expect the US to put a lot of pressure on the Israeli government (which is still a major shareholder, if I am correct).
André
ex Sabena #26567

User avatar
CX
Posts: 788
Joined: 30 Jul 2005, 00:00

Post by CX »

It's only 7 planes though... and i mean the airlines in US don't ALL use just Boeings..

User avatar
fokker_f27
Posts: 1812
Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 00:00
Location: Weerde, Zemst - Belgium

Post by fokker_f27 »

I still think they're better off with the 787. A330 are a fairly ond design now, so the 787 or A350 seems a good deal, because even tough you have to wait, it will pay off: 787 are state-of-the-art planes. If I where them, I would wait, but those 767s are really starting to get old.
The most sexy girl in the sky: The Sud-Est Caravelle 12.

User avatar
TexasGuy
Posts: 669
Joined: 15 Apr 2006, 00:00
Location: Houston, Texas

Post by TexasGuy »

fokker_f27 wrote:I still think they're better off with the 787. A330 are a fairly ond design now, so the 787 or A350 seems a good deal, because even tough you have to wait, it will pay off: 787 are state-of-the-art planes. If I where them, I would wait, but those 767s are really starting to get old.

Are they not re-doing the interiors of thier 767's? As for the age of the plane, its a tank. Interior upgrades will do the job from a passenger standpoint. The Boeing and MD aircraft were built to last.
Theres nothing better than slow cooked fall off the bone BBQ, Texas style

smokejumper
Posts: 1033
Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:00
Location: Northern Virginia USA

Post by smokejumper »

I really did not intend to stir-up the pot too much, but I’m sure that Delta Airlines (AL), American AL, Continental AL, United AL, etc., who receive no direct Federal aid and are in, about to go into, or just emerging from bankruptcy, would love to receive some of the money that the US has sent to Israel. El Al may be private now, but for decades the US taxpayer propped up the airline through its government. The money paid by these taxpayers, in part, was paid by Boeing workers.

When the US government (really the US taxpayer) gives Israel $3 billion in assistance, this money is not available for more important purposes. Eight months ago, two hurricanes struck the US Gulf Coast. An area larger than Great Britain was destroyed (Southern Louisiana, Southern Mississippi and Southeastern Texas – take Great Britain and lay it on its side for comparison). Many people are still homeless and Federal money is used to house and feed them, rebuild their homes, rebuild the levies, restore roads and sewers, etc.

I contend that monies that have been used for foreign assistance would be better used to help our people at home. Sorry for the diatribe, but a nerve has been struck.

regi
Posts: 5140
Joined: 02 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: Bruges

Post by regi »

I didn't check the details, but did El Al really BUY the planes, or did they lease them? Some of the larger leasing companies have very close ties with Tel Aviv.

Robin_Bamps

Post by Robin_Bamps »

EL AL considered the A330 a previous time back in 1999, but than dropped an eventual order in favour of the Boeing 777, of which the airline currently operates four aircraft.

Regards, Robin Bamps.

smokejumper
Posts: 1033
Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:00
Location: Northern Virginia USA

Post by smokejumper »

You can see the aid the US taxpayer has give to Israel. Given this, should we not expect to get something back?

U.S. Financial Aid To Israel: Figures, Facts, and Impact


Summary
Benefits to Israel of U.S. Aid
Since 1949 (As of November 1, 1997)

Foreign Aid Grants and Loans
$74,157,600,000

Other U.S. Aid (12.2% of Foreign Aid)
$9,047,227,200

Interest to Israel from Advanced Payments
$1,650,000,000

Grand Total
$84,854,827,200

Total Benefits per Israeli
$14,630 Cost to U.S. Taxpayers of U.S.
Aid to Israel

Grand Total
$84,854,827,200

Interest Costs Borne by U.S.
$49,936,680,000

Total Cost to U.S. Taxpayers
$134,791,507,200

Total Taxpayer Cost per Israeli
$23,240

smokejumper
Posts: 1033
Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:00
Location: Northern Virginia USA

Post by smokejumper »

The source was www.wrmea.com (Washington Report on Middle East Affairs). My comments are directly related too aviation since they relate to the financing of aircraft. The most brilliant airplane design is worthless if customers can not buy them and the US has certainly helped Israel buy planes (thus the relevance).

Post Reply