Emergency landing of an Air India B747-400

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

hakan
Posts: 600
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 00:00
Contact:

Emergency landing of an Air India B747-400

Post by hakan »

I have some patchy news that an Air India B747-400 had an emergency landing at Los Angeles airport.During take off rear tyre blown and the pilot had to circle the aircraft over ocean to dump the fuel and later tried a successful emergency landing at L.A. airport.Rear of the aircraft generated lots of flame after landing, but the fire brigade was able to cool down the aircraft.All crew and passenger were safe.

Anyone else has more info or pictures about this????? :?:
Last edited by hakan on 20 Dec 2005, 12:27, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Avro
Posts: 8856
Joined: 28 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Avro »

You can watch some videos here: http://cbs2.com/topstories/local_story_354022709.html

It's reported to be VT-AIM

Chris

hakan
Posts: 600
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 00:00
Contact:

Post by hakan »

Thanks for the link.It is amazing to watch the video clip to see what happened.Thanks to the skilled pilots that there are no serious injuries. :lol:

website-info
Posts: 750
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 00:00

Post by website-info »

just a small point, it's actually Air India not Indian Airlines (that's another airline in India)

T

hakan
Posts: 600
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 00:00
Contact:

Post by hakan »

website-info wrote:just a small point, it's actually Air India not Indian Airlines (that's another airline in India)

T
Thanks I have just edited the article.

itsdoctorv
Posts: 31
Joined: 19 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: London

Post by itsdoctorv »

Anybody knows how fast a 747 can dump fuel? And given a max TOM, how much needs to be dumped/burned to get to max LM?

Thanks!

Docv

User avatar
Advisor
Posts: 3616
Joined: 09 Sep 2004, 03:00
Location: Heart Lies In Rwy 09/27 'D' 'B-3' TaxiTrack
Contact:

Post by Advisor »

hakan wrote:Thanks for the link.It is amazing to watch the video clip to see what happened.Thanks to the skilled pilots that there are no serious injuries. :lol:
Yes, i agree. It is the quick thinking and experience of the Pilot/s who made it possible. Kudos to them.
Aum Sweet Aum.

chunk
Posts: 764
Joined: 07 May 2004, 00:00
Location: Scotland usually

Post by chunk »

Probably just in case there was another knock on problem from the first one. Would you want them to continue if you were on the plane? Not sure if I would!

I wonder if this has anything to do with the overweight cabin crew mentioned in another recent AI article!!

regi
Posts: 5140
Joined: 02 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: Bruges

Post by regi »

blowing a tyre can cause serious structural damage. Maybe the landing gear could not be retracted safely.

regi
Posts: 5140
Joined: 02 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: Bruges

Post by regi »

I wonder now where all those Airbus bashers are after that blocked landing gear on the Airbus?

chunk
Posts: 764
Joined: 07 May 2004, 00:00
Location: Scotland usually

Post by chunk »

Was it not a blown tyre that assisted n the concorde crash?

User avatar
Knight255
Posts: 741
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 00:00
Location: Daytona Beach, USA

Post by Knight255 »

Anybody knows how fast a 747 can dump fuel?
I was wondering the same thing. I'm guessing that they dumped over 100,000 lbs. of fuel for that long-haul journey. :(
"What's this button do?? I don't know, push it and find out................."

itsdoctorv
Posts: 31
Joined: 19 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: London

Post by itsdoctorv »

That would be an argument, but I can hardly see further problems originate from blowing a tyre
Yes but you have to remember that by opting to land back at your departure airport, you have KNOWN landing conditions. Especially with long haul, even though you might be flying to an airport suitable to make a landing with a blown tyre, the conditions in 8,10, 12 hours from now are not known with certainty. Winds could be stronger than expected, temperature higher, precipitation heavier, etc. Even worse, you might have to divert if your destination is closed due to weather or another emergency. You are now facing the prospect of perhaps landing at an airport with a smaller runway and lesser emergency services.

I would definitely be unimpressed if they had carried on to destination instead of going back to LAX.

DocV

User avatar
744rules
Posts: 1041
Joined: 16 Oct 2002, 00:00

Post by 744rules »

itsdoctorv wrote:Anybody knows how fast a 747 can dump fuel? And given a max TOM, how much needs to be dumped/burned to get to max LM?

Thanks!

Docv
Max TOW 744 is about 394t
max landing weight is 285t (pax) and 302t (freighter)

I have to look up how fast fuel can be dumped, but if you look at the weights, the flight has to dump about 100t
motorcycling : sensation with a twist of the wrist

User avatar
PYX
Posts: 183
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 00:00

Post by PYX »

regi wrote:I wonder now where all those Airbus bashers are after that blocked landing gear on the Airbus?
Apples and oranges. Blown tires happen every now and then to every aircraft. The Airbus blocked nose gear problem is a recurring one that would indicate a design or manufacturing flaw.

Post Reply