www.airliners.net
www.airliners.net
www.airliners.net
This is an awsome site for pics and info. I've learned alot from it and recommend you check it out!
This is an awsome site for pics and info. I've learned alot from it and recommend you check it out!
I think we all know Airliners.net ...
But you should also check out http://www.airliners.be ! A free aviation website for the Belgian and International Aviation Enthousiasts.
Greetz,
Andries 
But you should also check out http://www.airliners.be ! A free aviation website for the Belgian and International Aviation Enthousiasts.
Greetz,
Don't dream your life, live your dream !!!
-
Humberside
- Posts: 1441
- Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 00:00
- Location: Barton Upon Humber, UK
- Contact:
-
bigjulie
I used to be a member (back in the days when you had to become a first class member) and I left because I could not afford it anymore. Now, I can afford it but, I think Luchtzak is far superior anyways and it is free.Humberside wrote:The problem with a.net is you have to pay to post on the forums and for some other things too
BTW: I used to be member NWA320 (I used to be a huge Airbus fan
Onward and Upward...
-
bigjulie
No problemo.
When talking to"unknown" photographers you hear quite often that their pics are refused for one or other reason. When you're taking a look at their pics they tried to send in, you can't agree with the motivation given by A.net with the reason why those pics were refused. Often those pics are from an outstanding quality, and you may ask yourself why they really were refused for.
Especially when you can find a lot of "kak"pictures on A.net, but the only difference is that they're coming from a photographer who "made his name on A.net"
I'm sure if you send in the pics of some "unknown" photographers, only with the name of some "so-called" experts beneath it they will get published!
Besides this, don't misunderstand me, there are a lot of fantastic pics at A.net
When talking to"unknown" photographers you hear quite often that their pics are refused for one or other reason. When you're taking a look at their pics they tried to send in, you can't agree with the motivation given by A.net with the reason why those pics were refused. Often those pics are from an outstanding quality, and you may ask yourself why they really were refused for.
Especially when you can find a lot of "kak"pictures on A.net, but the only difference is that they're coming from a photographer who "made his name on A.net"
I'm sure if you send in the pics of some "unknown" photographers, only with the name of some "so-called" experts beneath it they will get published!
Besides this, don't misunderstand me, there are a lot of fantastic pics at A.net
Ok thanks for elaborating RagoRago wrote:No problemo.
When talking to"unknown" photographers you hear quite often that their pics are refused for one or other reason. When you're taking a look at their pics they tried to send in, you can't agree with the motivation given by A.net with the reason why those pics were refused. Often those pics are from an outstanding quality, and you may ask yourself why they really were refused for.
Especially when you can find a lot of "kak"pictures on A.net, but the only difference is that they're coming from a photographer who "made his name on A.net"
I'm sure if you send in the pics of some "unknown" photographers, only with the name of some "so-called" experts beneath it they will get published!
Besides this, don't misunderstand me, there are a lot of fantastic pics at A.net
Chris