Bruspotter, please use the spellcheck more often

Give your feedback, make new suggestions to improve https://www.aviation24.be, is there anything else we can do for you?
Post Reply
User avatar
Bruspotter
Posts: 2068
Joined: 04 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: (Antwerp/Belgium)
Contact:

Post by Bruspotter »

Hello

Ok , Jan. ;)

Maybe I do post a little bit too much for nothing....but a lot of others doing that too...so , I thought it wouldn't be THAT bad....

By the way; I do use the spellcheck the most of the time...except for very short messages wich I assume there are not faults in....

But as I told before...grammatical faults want be corrected by that.... :roll:

Best regards: Yannick ;)

User avatar
Bottie
Posts: 2076
Joined: 18 Jan 2004, 00:00
Location: 2nm from EBUL
Contact:

Post by Bottie »

Bruspotter wrote: By the way; I do use the spellcheck the most of the time...
Because you sometimes invent your own words, like 'intersting' ;)

website-info
Posts: 750
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 00:00

Post by website-info »

obviously SpellChecker does not work then !!!
'wich' is not a word, try which or witch (if flying on a broomstick is involved)

But as I told before...grammatical faults want be corrected by that.... :roll:
and want should be won't

:)
[/quote]

User avatar
luchtzak
Posts: 11841
Joined: 18 Sep 2002, 00:00
Location: Hofstade, Zemst - Belgium
Contact:

Post by luchtzak »

Bruspotter wrote:Maybe I do post a little bit too much for nothing....but a lot of others doing that too...so , I thought it wouldn't be THAT bad....


Yannickske,

when you post something on the forums, please take care that the message is funded and with knowledge and that it adds something to the actual topic.

Note: split 3 messages mentioned above from the Antonov-topic
Last edited by luchtzak on 15 Apr 2005, 15:21, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Comet
Posts: 6484
Joined: 05 Jul 2003, 00:00
Location: Scarborough, North Yorkshire, England
Contact:

Post by Comet »

Bruspotter does have a point about the grammar stuff though. If your grammar is incorrect then the spellchecker does not detect this, and the spellchecker does not always recognise common words, or it only accepts US spelling.
Sabena and Sobelair - gone but never forgotten.
Louise

User avatar
Lyulka
Posts: 555
Joined: 04 Dec 2002, 00:00
Location: EBBR
Contact:

Post by Lyulka »

Bruspotter wrote:but a lot of others doing that too
So that's a good reason to do it too, and fill all topics with masses of useless posts??
:?

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Ctrl +F7

Post by SN30952 »

Comet wrote:spellchecker only accepts US spelling.

Yes, but as I said longtime ago, nothing is against using a 'real' editor for your contributions to the forums.
One might even be tempted to use OpenOffice, the office suite you can download for free @ OpenOffice.org and a simple F7* will do the job....

Furthermore, you can then save your contribution into a Acrobat .pdf file.
That gives you an archive of all your contributions, and that makes all research easy on all what you wrote.

Note: I do that too, for some members who are specialists in "I never said that, I never wrote that". Very useful! And it is a good tool to decide whether I would eventually decide if I would react.

*Ctrl + F7 gives you a Thesaurus and F7 can even be automated. (automatatiese spellingskontroll!)

Post Reply