KLM plane bound for Mexico denied entry into US airspace.

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

User avatar
earthman
Posts: 2221
Joined: 24 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: AMS

KLM plane bound for Mexico denied entry into US airspace.

Post by earthman »

A KLM aircraft flying from Holland to Mexico was denied entry in to US airspace because the Americans didn't like two of the passengers. Usually the US tells airlines way in advance if someone on the passenger list is a terror suspect, but this time they refused the plane when it was already flying over Canada. The Canadians didn't allow the plane to land, so it had to fly all the way back to Holland. There they got rid of the two suspects, and took off again to Mexico.

Sources: NOS and Luchtvaartnieuws.

vivek0072
Posts: 137
Joined: 16 Mar 2005, 00:00
Location: LAX
Contact:

Post by vivek0072 »

were they expecting another 911 ? This sounds crazy to me.

Cades
Posts: 3
Joined: 08 Apr 2005, 00:00

Post by Cades »

This is just plain stupid.

Coudn't they land in havana or something?

User avatar
earthman
Posts: 2221
Joined: 24 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: AMS

Post by earthman »

I suspect they couldn't avoid the US due to ETOPS restrictions. Without those, there wouldn't be much sense in flying from Holland to Mexico over Canada and the US in the first place.

User avatar
Avro
Posts: 8856
Joined: 28 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Avro »

How ridiculous :roll:

And above all I'm sure the 2 suspects were no criminals at all and had no bad intentions....

Chris

regi
Posts: 5140
Joined: 02 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: Bruges

Post by regi »

I bet it was Bobby Fisher going to Havana to play chess with Castro.

User avatar
sab319
Posts: 2142
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 00:00
Location: Mortsel, antwerp, Flanders, Belgium, Europe, Earth, Milky way
Contact:

Post by sab319 »

This is just ridiculous, the plane doesn't even land in the US...

User avatar
B744skipper
Posts: 1509
Joined: 21 Apr 2004, 00:00

Post by B744skipper »

What a load of BS this is..... :evil:
Why didn't they just hang 2 F-16's to the wings of the aircraft to be sure (although I think that the danger was not that great). Do those morons have to inform KLM that late?
Btw, why was the plane not allowed to land in Canada?

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Post by SN30952 »

It is unlawful hindering of competitors.
American carriers are loosing a lot of transit traffic to European carriers. As a revanche they stop these carriers when they want to use US airspace.

Europe should do the same... with unwanted american traffics in its air space.

V-Bird
Posts: 672
Joined: 21 Feb 2004, 00:00
Location: Ab 01.04.2005 Aachen
Contact:

re

Post by V-Bird »

according to the dutch sunday news paper "de zondag telegraaf " the plane ( 747 - 400 combi ) carried also 15 ( very expensive ) race horses.

JetB
Posts: 651
Joined: 25 Sep 2003, 00:00

Post by JetB »

@ SN30952 :

Cant we and the Americans be more civilized ? Guess not, but where is this going to stop ?, WWIII maybe :wink:

User avatar
earthman
Posts: 2221
Joined: 24 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: AMS

Post by earthman »

If it was a 747, then why did they fly over Canada and the USA in the first place??? Isn't that a large detour?

Can anyone actually confirm that it was a 747?

Flying_Dutchman
Posts: 639
Joined: 10 Dec 2003, 00:00
Location: The Netherlands, Les Pays-Bas

Post by Flying_Dutchman »

earthman wrote:If it was a 747, then why did they fly over Canada and the USA in the first place??? Isn't that a large detour?

Can anyone actually confirm that it was a 747?
Well, KLM operates a Boeing 747 on the Amsterdam-Mexico City flight according to the timetable and second it's not a longer route. It looks like that, because the route is showed on a Mercatorprojection. When you point out that route on a globe, you will see it's the shortest route.
Look at this:

Amsterdam - Mexico City on a mercatorprojection
Image

Amsterdam - Mexico City on a globe
Image

;)

User avatar
bits44
Posts: 1889
Joined: 03 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: Vancouver CYVR

Post by bits44 »

The U.S. and Canada share the same security requirements for overflights, so thats why they were not allowed to land in Canada. But the U.S. is getting a little carried away, read this article regarding new proposed Passport requirements, if you are a U.S. Citizen you'll need a Passport to get back into your own country. Whats really stupid is there is a place called Point Roberts Washington, and the only way you can get there is through Canada, or by boat.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05096/483475.stm

User avatar
earthman
Posts: 2221
Joined: 24 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: AMS

Post by earthman »

Don't be silly, everybody knows the earth is flat!! ;-)

JohnA
Posts: 177
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 00:00

Post by JohnA »

Questions from an American with no membership here:
Well, I am not sure how far from Canada the flight was at the time he was told to turn around and head back to Holland, and wondered if doing so put him at risk of a low fuel situation by the time he got back?
Anybody?

User avatar
earthman
Posts: 2221
Joined: 24 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: AMS

Post by earthman »

This article has a map showing how far they got. Basically they had just reached Canada after Greenland, they were probably halfway there. I'm sure the Canadians would have let them land if they didn't have enough fuel to get back.

They did make it all the way back to Amsterdam, I think they would have landed somewhere along the way if they were out of fuel.

regi
Posts: 5140
Joined: 02 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: Bruges

Post by regi »

Bobby Fisher flies now Islandair. Adding up frequent miles.

User avatar
nwa757
Posts: 1103
Joined: 17 Jul 2003, 00:00
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin - USA
Contact:

Post by nwa757 »

SN30952 wrote:It is unlawful hindering of competitors.
American carriers are loosing a lot of transit traffic to European carriers. As a revanche they stop these carriers when they want to use US airspace.
:roll:

I am not sure how to respond to this one. This is one of the most ridiculous statements I have heard in a long time.

Maybe the US should have no security at all. Maybe we should just open up our doors to terrorists and let them attack and kill all of us. Is that really what you want?

September 11th was the ABSOLUTE WORST DAY OF MY LIFE as it was for most other Americans and maybe some of you. I can not describe to you the fear I had on that horrific day. I never want to see that happen again and if preventing it means that a KLM 747 has to fly back to AMS, well than so be it.
Onward and Upward...

Stoney
Posts: 337
Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 00:00
Location: Muizen, Mechelen
Contact:

Re: re

Post by Stoney »

V-Bird wrote:according to the dutch sunday news paper "de zondag telegraaf " the plane ( 747 - 400 combi ) carried also 15 ( very expensive ) race horses.
were probably arab race horses... Stupid american governement...

Somebody mentioned this will end in WWIII, I have the same fears... America against the world...

Post Reply