Cargo B moves to LGG

[Conti764]

Yes I must admit , I'm an hypocrit...probably my flamish part, my father is from Sint Truiden, I guess it's genetic...

Who's being racist now, heh? While we are pointing out facts, you have been racist from your very first post in this topic, so draw your conclusions, hypocrit.

I was assuming that the moderators would erase all that crap about Wallonia, but once again, you guy's are from the same side of the fence...

If some posts need to be deleted, it should be yours first. Never have I insulted Walloons, like you try with is.

for the point number two, as you say "A very large part of the staff at Brussels Airport still is french speaking"....still is french speaking.... but for how long...It's shrinking like the snow in the sun...Brussels airlines staff 80% vlamingen,LHT 90% flemish,aviapartner same story...

Still 30-40% of the employees at the airport are still French speaking. When I talk with cleaning crews, with employees of the company who search and collect the baggage carts, I can't even speak Dutch. Maybe it's true that the majority of french speaking staff works for the supportive jobs, but that's from no matter when we talk about employment.

I'm ex SNT, and I can tell you that in 2002 when they laid off the 600 guy's, there wasn't much flamish in the bunch, ...what would you expect...HR flamish...Union flamish...laid-off 85% french speaking...

Yeah right. Unions are federally arranged. If there would be a tendency that only French speaking employees got layed off, this wouldn't stand a chance. Paranoia 1.

And now you are moaning just because cargo B operation moves to LGG, you are crazy man...if they moved to LGG, it's because it better suit their plan. period.

First of all, do you even know the meaning of the verb 'to moan'? Its not something I do when it comes to aviation

Schouppe explained it very well in the parliament yesterday. With the new fleet they have an exception on the rules. From january trough april they had 105 movements at BRU and only 3 of them were in the hours of the restriction. So what reason is there to move to LGG? LGG is actively searching for clients within the portfolio of BRU, now why would that be and how could they manage to attract carriers away from BRU? Maybe with a little help of the Walloon government like Ryanair got? Speaking about Ryanair. What if BRU would offer them something CRL can't match, with the help of the Flemish government, and they would move all of their operations to BRU, thus CRL losing their main client? What do you think would the reactions in Walloonia be like? Happy and chanting because those jobs didn't go outside Belgium? Get real...

Anyway who's working for Cargo B???do you think they will hire french speaking just because they move to LL?? Is it what you are afraid of??? Really??

No. Paranoia 2.

Stop with the french conspiration it is ridiculous,as usual the vlamingen show that they are completly paranoic...

Well, my dear Wallon friend, do you really wanna step in a discussion about this country? I can give you numerous arguments, but then we would really step into a political discussion that hasn't a tiny bit to do with aviation. I won't do it, since this still is an aviation forum.

Waht are you trying to demonstrate here, that all politic in wallonia is crap, and everything is fair and professional in vlaaaanderen???...

Paranoia 3.

Talk about aviation, and stop to break my balls with your stupid political comments...or may be the solution would be to switch luchtzak.be to luchtzak.vl, so at least you can full time bash the walloon and the fransquillion from Brussels...

I'm surprised though that we did not hear comment from regi,the jan oliebazar.... the full VMO-TAK-VB team would have been on the field ....

Maybe it's time for you to indeed search another aviation related website. It's clear you have a problem with Flanders and the flemish, and to your biggest distress, there are far to many of them on this website.

[sn26567]

I have been reading this topic with interest. The main factors in the decision of Cargo B are probably economical, but it is not possible to entirely avoid a political discussion. Therefore I let the discussion run until now.

It is possible to have a political discussion (although we try to avoid them in this forum) whilst remaining polite and civilised. But since the tone is becoming more and more antagonistic and the words close to unacceptable, Besides, the last posts do no longer relate to the title of the topic. I will thus close the topic now. I guess that most of the arguments have been developed and that there is not much more to say. Hence, end of the discussion.

Sorry for the participants who were bringing a positive contribution to the discussions. They remain free to open a new topic where politics will be excluded.