Highly doubtful. Not only is there a lack of slots at GRU (no more slots at peak times), but the market is already well covered by other in the LH Group (LH and LX) and Star airlines TAM and off course TP (though TAM will probably leave once the merger with LAN is taking effect).Air Key West wrote:My "12 points" would go to Sao Paulo. Brazil is a strong emerging economy and probably that the InBev people in Leuven would love to have a direct flight to Sao Paulo.
If you can't make a destination like PVG work ex BRU (Hainan about to cancel this destination), any second tier destination is even more difficult. Only when there is enough O&D (AF with Wuhan and KLM with Xiamen) one can make these destinations work (Chengdu is somewhat an odd one, but KLM had a lot of problems making this destination work).Air Key West wrote: Next, I would consider China. Perhaps not the cities which come to mind first like PEK or HKG, but what about important secondary cities where there is still no or little competition ?
Cargo can't pay for the flight, moreover as the Europe - China market is getting saturated (cargo traffic is down this year).Air Key West wrote:a few destinations in China (the cargo alone would probably make the flights profitable)
Which is already served by Hainan...Passenger wrote: Brussels Airlines was established by Belgian companies. If these share holders would like to have a direct flight to China, they will all prefer Bejing as first destination there.
This usually means it's not a very high yielding and/or profitable destination. The only viable destinations in Europe ex TPE seem to be AMS and LHR.. Maybe an option if Eva joins Star, but even then FRA and VIE (to which they already fly) would be first.Flanker wrote: While we're at it, we might debate the case of TPE, a somehow neglected city/airport.
Funny thing is that none of the LH Group airlines seem to operate to Taipei
And you forget the largest operator of CAN, China Southern. They'll send the A380 to Paris (if everything goes according to plan) in a few months time and operate nonstop CAN-AMS. Highly doubtful that there is enough room for SN at CAN (LH doesn't even fly daily to CAN). However why would one fly via BRU when you have a daily flight via ADD?OO-ITR wrote: Apparantly CAN (Guangzhou Airport) is Chinese second busiest airport (pax wise) and third busiest cargo airport. AF, LH, ET, KQ and TK already serve this city.
Sorry, but I doubt that SN should consider China or Asia at all. BRU is a small market and SN's Star partners can do it better and cheaper. Thus better to devote your scarce resources to something you're good at.
Then hopefully with better yield than last time....cathay belgium wrote:With A343 JNB comes in mind again,
BTW strange that nobody mentions India. not that I think this is a good idea though.