
Flightglobal
Moderator: Latest news team

Could be because ... SN was short of aircraftcrew1990 wrote: 14 Nov 2020, 21:04
.....
It's look fabulous, but tomorrow is less glamorous, Zero long haul flight, nothing, nada.
Maybe the market is short of passengers?crew1990 wrote: 22 Nov 2020, 14:00 One single flight today, London, because Brussels Airlines is short of aircraft?
We did mention it, mind you: https://www.aviation24.be/airlines/luft ... n-affairs/brusselsairlinesfan wrote: 22 Nov 2020, 16:04 Hello there,
As nobody did mention the forthcoming change regarding brussels airlines CEO, what do you think about it?
Indeed, it was mentionned in the news section but surprisingly, it was not discussed within the forum. So it means that the CEO, CFO and COO positions will be in « german hands » ... + CF as president ?sn26567 wrote:We did mention it, mind you: https://www.aviation24.be/airlines/luft ... n-affairs/brusselsairlinesfan wrote: Hello there,
As nobody did mention the forthcoming change regarding brussels airlines CEO, what do you think about it?
It clearly means a stronger grip of parent Lufthansa on the company, with three upper management positions filled by Germans. And for Vranckx it is also clearly a promotion: he has done a good (!) job at SN, he is promoted to LX and asked to do the same improvement job on their balance sheet (which will be easier, as LX is in a better, or rather less bad situation, financially speaking).
I have my own opinion, but I will let others answer that question!brusselsairlinesfan wrote: 22 Nov 2020, 18:52 What will be retained - in your humble opinion - from the Dieter Vranckx era as CEO?
There is not enough demand to spread out the flights.crew1990 wrote: 22 Nov 2020, 14:28
My point was that, you have days with 6 long haul flights a day (saturday's) and plenty of connecting flight, and day with one single flight. There is just a problem with the use of the fleet. The demand is low (thank you sn26567 I didn't know) but it doesn't mean that you can't split the production more equally during the week. In therm of long haul aircraft, as there is only 22 long haul flight per week, it could be 3 flight per day with one day of the week 4 long haul flight. 4 A330 active would be sufficient to reduce the cost instead of activation 6 aircraft.
It's exactly the actual organisation for scheduled flights to central Africa and most of west Africa destinations.SN501 wrote: 24 Nov 2020, 22:47 According to my observations on FR24, flights to/from Africa are operated by a single crew who stay overnight abroad with the aircraft. This kind of ops can explain the current timetable.
No, there is no crew flying down to Africa and back directly. All crew stay minimum 24h. Some aircraft are staying on ground during one day to make that the crew stay 24h no mater how many weekly rotation. And for flight were there is enough rotation per week like Dakar, the aircraft fly back directly, but there is of course a change of crew, and the crew doesn't have to stay too long at destination as another aircraft come the day after.Bel33 wrote: 25 Nov 2020, 17:04It's exactly the actual organisation for scheduled flights to central Africa and most of west Africa destinations.SN501 wrote: 24 Nov 2020, 22:47 According to my observations on FR24, flights to/from Africa are operated by a single crew who stay overnight abroad with the aircraft. This kind of ops can explain the current timetable.
Sometimes, same crew operates directly the return flight when duration of flight is around 5 hrs
And New York.