The official aviation quiz topic!
Moderator: Latest news team
-
realplaneshaveprops
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00
Reduced Vertical Seperation Minima
To keep safe vertical distance between planes and using the airspace as optimal as possible.
Planes with RVSM equipment may fly "closer" to each other.
To keep safe vertical distance between planes and using the airspace as optimal as possible.
Planes with RVSM equipment may fly "closer" to each other.
When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."
-
realplaneshaveprops
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00
That's correct MD-11!
The goal of RVSM is to reduce the vertical separation above flight level (FL) 290 from the current 2000-ft minimum to 1000-ft minimum. This will allow aircraft to safely fly more optimum profiles, gain fuel savings and increase airspace capacity.
http://www.ecacnav.com/rvsm/default.htm
Next question plz?
Koen
The goal of RVSM is to reduce the vertical separation above flight level (FL) 290 from the current 2000-ft minimum to 1000-ft minimum. This will allow aircraft to safely fly more optimum profiles, gain fuel savings and increase airspace capacity.
http://www.ecacnav.com/rvsm/default.htm
Next question plz?
Koen
In case of "distress" ( for example total engine loss or ditching ) the call "Mayday Mayday Mayday" is made followed by "This is flight****"
What word is called out three times as well in case of "urgency" ( example: lost, partial engine failure ), followed by "This is flight ***" ?
What word is called out three times as well in case of "urgency" ( example: lost, partial engine failure ), followed by "This is flight ***" ?
When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."
-
realplaneshaveprops
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00
-
HorsePower
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: 12 Jan 2005, 00:00
- Location: France
-
realplaneshaveprops
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00
-
HorsePower
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: 12 Jan 2005, 00:00
- Location: France
-
realplaneshaveprops
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00
-
HorsePower
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: 12 Jan 2005, 00:00
- Location: France
-
realplaneshaveprops
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00
-
HorsePower
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: 12 Jan 2005, 00:00
- Location: France
Yeah, I've heard that Nitrogen atomium is a little bit bigger than standard air. Personally, I think it is BS knowing that air is 81% constitued with Nitrogen.MD-11 wrote:The air cannot escape the tyre, so the pressure doesn't drop.
On a side note, have you heard already about inerted tanks (see TWA 800 official inquisity)?
Regards
Seb.
EDIT: Oops
Last edited by HorsePower on 19 Jun 2005, 19:18, edited 1 time in total.
-
realplaneshaveprops
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00
-
HorsePower
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: 12 Jan 2005, 00:00
- Location: France
realplaneshaveprops wrote:And yes, I've heard of inerted fueltanks, it's not used in civil aviation I think, only military.
Now, it will be used on civilian aircrafts ($$). I'm not sure but I think all new airplane (A380 + B787) will be fitted with.
I give up, but wait for other members (1 or 2 days) before release the answer.realplaneshaveprops wrote:Do you want a extra hint or the correct answer?
Regards
Seb.
-
realplaneshaveprops
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00
-
realplaneshaveprops
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00