Why does AA not have any 747's
Moderator: Latest news team
Why does AA not have any 747's
I recently flew on American Airlines and appreciated their 777's. I read in the in-flight magazine that they are the world's biggest airline with over 900 aircrafts!
I always wondered why AA never decided to purchase and 747 for their fleet (back in the days when 747's were popular)?
Did they ever have any? Does anyone know more info on why this major carrier doesn't have a 747?
Captain
I always wondered why AA never decided to purchase and 747 for their fleet (back in the days when 747's were popular)?
Did they ever have any? Does anyone know more info on why this major carrier doesn't have a 747?
Captain
Boeing 747 - The massive Boeing 747 was the world's first jumbo jet. American Airlines first introduced the 747 in March 1970. While American used the 747 to carry passengers for only a few years, it served as an all-cargo aircraft for longer. This oversized aircraft was capable of carrying oversized cargo such as one of San Francisco's famous streetcars.
KT
KT
- B744skipper
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: 21 Apr 2004, 00:00
@Captain, back in the days when the B747 was hot, a lot of airlines ordered them out of prestige. When they came into service, many airlines quickly found out that they could not fill the seats. A lot of airlines have dumped them since then (AA, Delta, Continental).
AA had also some Boeing 747SP's in the late 80/early 90's which they took over from TWA, for their long-range routes, until the B777 came which also could fly that long (but a lot cheaper).
Nowadays a B747 would be too large to fit into the AA-system, maybe they could fill them on some routes but it would uneconomically to operate just a few of them. Same goes for Delta and Continental.
When you want so extra information, use these two links:
All the info about the American Airlines B747 fleetclick
A lot of pictures of Amercian Airlines' B747's click
Btw, Herpa makes a 1/500 scale-model of the AA Boeing 747SP (unfortunately with the inaccurate metallic paint), but if you really love AA and the B747, you should keep an eye open for it.
Here is a model review about the American Airlines B747SP from Herpa.
AA had also some Boeing 747SP's in the late 80/early 90's which they took over from TWA, for their long-range routes, until the B777 came which also could fly that long (but a lot cheaper).
Nowadays a B747 would be too large to fit into the AA-system, maybe they could fill them on some routes but it would uneconomically to operate just a few of them. Same goes for Delta and Continental.
When you want so extra information, use these two links:
All the info about the American Airlines B747 fleetclick
A lot of pictures of Amercian Airlines' B747's click
Btw, Herpa makes a 1/500 scale-model of the AA Boeing 747SP (unfortunately with the inaccurate metallic paint), but if you really love AA and the B747, you should keep an eye open for it.
Here is a model review about the American Airlines B747SP from Herpa.
Something else to keep in mind is that back in the days, AA was VERY loyal to MD. Their fleet consisted primarily of DC-9's (now MD-80s) and DC-10s. They loved MD!!!! (My use of the abbreviation MD is due to my poor spelling of McDon.....) 
"What's this button do?? I don't know, push it and find out................."
Thanks everyone for your interesting answers
I can now see that a 747 is an expensive and often not an economical choice for an airline such as AA.
I was in LAX last Saturday and noticed that many coast-to-coast fligths i.e LAX-JFK LAX-BOX were now operated by 737 and 757. It's crazy to be on a 737 for such a long flight (around 5 hours). I know they can go that far but I would much prefer to travel on a 767 or equivalent wide-body for a 5-6 hour flight, especially if doing the red-eye.
I'm wondering if Boeing's argument of the 787 (smaller planes for point-to-point travel) is not actually that stupid.
Captain.
I was in LAX last Saturday and noticed that many coast-to-coast fligths i.e LAX-JFK LAX-BOX were now operated by 737 and 757. It's crazy to be on a 737 for such a long flight (around 5 hours). I know they can go that far but I would much prefer to travel on a 767 or equivalent wide-body for a 5-6 hour flight, especially if doing the red-eye.
I'm wondering if Boeing's argument of the 787 (smaller planes for point-to-point travel) is not actually that stupid.
Captain.
-
Robin_Bamps
-
HorsePower
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: 12 Jan 2005, 00:00
- Location: France
livin737 wrote:well the american airlines had a 747-sp and 747-200 didn't they
They even had 2 747SP's.
N601AA c/n: 21962
N602AA c/n: 21963
The ex N602AA is still in active service.
