Skylink Airways, the new low-fare trans-atlantic airline
Moderator: Latest news team
Skylink Airways, the new low-fare trans-atlantic airline
Today in "Het Nieuwsblad": Goedkoop vliegen naar VS met nieuwe maatschappij.
http://www.nieuwsblad.be/Article/Detail ... D=GELC2N29
In short: according to the press, Skylink would like to add BRU as destination.Also they are looking after a new name. Ticket price: 300 $
http://www.nieuwsblad.be/Article/Detail ... D=GELC2N29
In short: according to the press, Skylink would like to add BRU as destination.Also they are looking after a new name. Ticket price: 300 $
And made an article about Skylink Airways, I did a luchtzak-search and found this information, mixed with todays information:
https://www.aviation24.be/article7503.html
What will be the new name for the company then?
https://www.aviation24.be/article7503.html
What will be the new name for the company then?
-
- Posts: 1441
- Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 00:00
- Location: Barton Upon Humber, UK
- Contact:
STN is in the UKCurious wrote:Isnt that route between the US-UK limited under the bermuda agreement or is stanstead outside that?
See my post: BERMUDA II INTACT
the US may limit the operating authorisations of such designated airlines between the US and London Heathrow or London Gatwick to operations that are also available for all US airlines under the air transport agreement or arrangements between the US and UK
Skylink is an american carrier.... it is the US that limits not the UK.
-
- Posts: 1441
- Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 00:00
- Location: Barton Upon Humber, UK
- Contact:
I don't really think long-haul transatlantic travel has really worked and will really work.
It's one thing Ryanair and the gang offering 1-2 hour short hops with quick turnarounds. But it's another thing trying to offer a similar type of service for a 6-8 hour flight at a low cost!!!
Remember Civair. There was a lot of hype about this South African airline that was going to fly from Stansted to Cape town. They never even operated the first flight!!!
Captain
It's one thing Ryanair and the gang offering 1-2 hour short hops with quick turnarounds. But it's another thing trying to offer a similar type of service for a 6-8 hour flight at a low cost!!!
Remember Civair. There was a lot of hype about this South African airline that was going to fly from Stansted to Cape town. They never even operated the first flight!!!
Captain
-
- Posts: 360
- Joined: 17 Oct 2003, 00:00
- Location: japan & Belgium
300,00$ or 230,00 € one way isn't quit low fare. With taxes and return ticket your price will be easily 500,00 €.
If you look a little bit around, and make your reservation a bit in advance you pay less with regular airlines.
At the end of this month I fly to Washington DC - Direct flight with United Airlines and I only paid 363,00 €
If you look a little bit around, and make your reservation a bit in advance you pay less with regular airlines.
At the end of this month I fly to Washington DC - Direct flight with United Airlines and I only paid 363,00 €
There is already an apparently successful transatlantic airline in Fly Zoom to Canada from LGW and GLA and maybe MAN (can't remember)- or are you just referring to the US? It seems their service is quite good as well.twan01 wrote:300,00$ or 230,00 € one way isn't quit low fare. With taxes and return ticket your price will be easily 500,00 €.
If you look a little bit around, and make your reservation a bit in advance you pay less with regular airlines.
At the end of this month I fly to Washington DC - Direct flight with United Airlines and I only paid 363,00 €
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 19 Aug 2004, 00:00
- Location: London
Southwest, Jet Blue, Easy Jet, Ryan Air, you name it, all make money by flying nothing bigger than an A320/B737. You'd think given the egos involved (at the head of those companies), at least one of them would have started low cost transatlantic flights if there was any chance of making money from them.
I believe one of the reasons might be airports. One of the big factors behind the low fares is the low airport charges. But most of those small airports used by low-cost carriers don't have a big enough runway for HEAVIES. Some of them also don't have CAT II/III ILS, which is going to be an issue in the winter.
Not so sure fuel is a big issue. Given that so much fuel is burned on take-off and climb, you'd think that fuel prices would hurt you more if you do short haul. What do you think?
Doc V
I believe one of the reasons might be airports. One of the big factors behind the low fares is the low airport charges. But most of those small airports used by low-cost carriers don't have a big enough runway for HEAVIES. Some of them also don't have CAT II/III ILS, which is going to be an issue in the winter.
Not so sure fuel is a big issue. Given that so much fuel is burned on take-off and climb, you'd think that fuel prices would hurt you more if you do short haul. What do you think?
Doc V
I have read that another LCC Atlantic Express is also "about" to start. I recall even speculations in the summer that easy jet were considering this with a 747, offcourse this was pure speculation otherwise something would have happend.
speaking for myself and I think there are passengers outthere that would agree with me, I rather pay the extra £50 or so and be more comfortable in a 14 hour round trip, assuming that these operators are going to be completely no thrills.
But how serious are they about there business class services, they could have something there, is there any data on the number of transatlantic biz customers?
speaking for myself and I think there are passengers outthere that would agree with me, I rather pay the extra £50 or so and be more comfortable in a 14 hour round trip, assuming that these operators are going to be completely no thrills.
But how serious are they about there business class services, they could have something there, is there any data on the number of transatlantic biz customers?