Fons, thanks for your quick reply.SN30952 wrote: OrientThai? The OX-fleet is, let me say it softly, a little bit decayed. I do not see a western clientele queueing to go on board of these aircraft. OX is 'shipping' a chinese clientele, at very low price, but can OX convince westerners to fly with them, when competition offers modern aircraft for just a little more Euros?
China Airline? Why would they come to EBBR? BRU is ok for cargo. Why dilute its passenger' s market position in AMS? CI could eventually envisage to fly to EBBR if Belgium grants it traffic rights, lets say to Canada or US. Taiwan is politcally close to US, so that could be a GO from that side. If BIAC wants to survive, it has to attract these traffic. Because about intra-Europe traffic [rights] everything is said. (BTW Why do you think the Dutch were interested in BIAC? Yes, to control this interconti traffic and bridle it, if need be.)
omerta project? this word tells you more about the content, then I can say.
Let me elaborate a few of these rumours.
Orient Thai has indeed a rather old fleet with an average fleet age of more than 26 years.
Nevertheless , the European operations of OX would be operated by their latest fleet addition, a B747-312, who is 19 years old and in relatively good shape.
I am quite sure OX had already signed an agreement to fly to Stockholm once a week, on behalf of a company named Eastjet.
The plan was to fly Brussels-Stockholm-Bangkok once a week.
Today I found out that this plan was dropped, in favour of the once a week joint-venture project of the Thomas Cook group & Best Tours to Phuket.
So far for Orient Thai.
China Airlines is another story.
China Airlines could well steal the lucrative Best Tours contract from Thai Airways, as Best Tours is getting a bit tired of the steep TG fares.
Best Tours is already an important partner on the weekly Phuket route, so I guess you won’t be seeing much Best Tours pax anymore on the TG 920/921 flights to HKT via FRA and BKK.
If China Airlines could sell around 300 blockspace seats a week on the Brussels market, on top of the sales via the regular commercial channels, then a twice a week non-stop link between BRU & BKK would certainly be justified.
Besides, Amsterdam would not have to suffer as the routing would be AMS - BRU - BKK - TPE - BKK - BRU - AMS.
But again, this depends on the decision of Best Tours and a few other tour-operators who are involved.
Hence, this link wouldn’t only generate pax sales for CI, but also cargo sales - that they can steal from competitor Eva Airways - and who knows maybe even a partnership with SN Brussels Airlines, who is looking for an Asian partner anyway.
But at the moment, it is just a rumour.
*Edit: Omerta info deleted upon request
