But would there be enough business traffic for an AA/SN cooperation on the MIA route ? that's the question.
If SN would operate the flight on its own, it would be difficult, but with the big AA partner it should be no problem to find business traffic.
MIA is not a big business city like NYC is, but BRU is the political and economical capital of Europe...
The only thing I could see is that there would be a lot of transit pax as well, going to South Amrica via MIA.
I think that's one of the many reasons why MIA is a important destination.
> a big tourist destination
> and an important transit route.
Someone asked how CityBird did on the MIA route : well, load factor was excellent but CTB still lost whopping amounts of money on the route, and as a fact on MCO as well. This why they were axed, together with LAX. Delsey only found out the same a couple of years later. These are mainly leisure routes. Please note that there is absolutely no correlation between the load factor and the revenue a flight generates, having a 'full house' doesn't mean anything at all. It's the business class that counts
I also think the profit of many destinations isn't indeed the LF, but the potential amount of Business traffic...
MIA is also an ideal gateway to the Carribean islands, the Southeast USA (all the way to New Orleans), and a vacation spot of its own, at a stone throw of the Everglades, Cape Canaveral, Disney World, Key West.
There should be no problem to fill planes.
If KLM stops the flight, SN/AA should take a part of this BENELUX market.
If they promote it the wright way, this destination could become a succes (like NYC and ORD).
Let's hope and see what happens...
SN/AA wake up (2005 ?)
greetings,
ATC