Tailstrike

A forum to discuss all aviation items (not for latest aviation news and military aviation news)

Moderator: Latest news team

Post Reply
moons

Tailstrike

Post by moons »

I found this picture of a 777 which is making a tailstrike

http://www.planepictures.net/show.cgi?238571

I don't get it that a pilot can mess it up like that?! Or isn't his fault?
What's the cause of a tailstrike? Is it a human error of the pilot or a problem with the "weight and balance" of the plane?

greetz

pilatus
Posts: 142
Joined: 09 Jan 2004, 00:00

Post by pilatus »

Well as far as I know it is a pilot mistake, but hey don't blame him, everyone can make mistakes but some off them are expensive :(

User avatar
Captain
Posts: 515
Joined: 09 Oct 2003, 00:00

Post by Captain »

What happened in this case? Did the plane continue to take off and fly to it's destination (I'm quite sure the plane is takeing off)?

or did they have to turn back and land again to inspect damage?

Captain

User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 1297
Joined: 04 Mar 2003, 00:00
Location: Hasselt

Post by Buzz »

Captain wrote:What happened in this case? Did the plane continue to take off and fly to it's destination (I'm quite sure the plane is takeing off)?

or did they have to turn back and land again to inspect damage?

Captain
Captain, just read the comment with the photo, it's all there...

User avatar
nwa757
Posts: 1103
Joined: 17 Jul 2003, 00:00
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin - USA
Contact:

Post by nwa757 »

Doesn't the 777 have a tail wheel? If it does, than it doesn't matter if the pilot makes a tailstrike.
Onward and Upward...

User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 1297
Joined: 04 Mar 2003, 00:00
Location: Hasselt

Post by Buzz »

nwa757 wrote:Doesn't the 777 have a tail wheel? If it does, than it doesn't matter if the pilot makes a tailstrike.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/628450/L/

No sign of a tail wheel here...

Even if there would be a tailwheel, such a heavy strike would cause damage no mather what I would assume...

User avatar
Captain
Posts: 515
Joined: 09 Oct 2003, 00:00

Post by Captain »

Sorry Buzz, didn't see the description above the photo (would have expected it to be below the photo).

Must have been scary for passengers :-(

Captain

bigjulie

Post by bigjulie »

I sent in a query to www.allexperts.com about this sort of thing happening & the expert assured me it could not happen because of the advanced fly-by wire controls, he assured me the flight management computers would over-ride excessive presure on the side-stick; I guess he was wrong :? .

moons

Post by moons »

Thanx for the answers people :)

greetz

Snoopy
Posts: 19
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Snoopy »

Hmmmm ..... Looks like a fake picture to me ... :?

User avatar
1V1
Posts: 165
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 00:00
Contact:

Post by 1V1 »

1.A side-stick is called like that because it's located on the lateral consoles
2.Most aircraft are certified for max tailwind 10kts. (nothing to do with Bert).
3.Windshear is predictable by the computer (predictive windshear)
4.A tailstrike occurs when you have more than max pitch.
-too high round out
-windshear
-bounced landing
-too fast rotation on take off
-windshear procedure on take off
-etc....
5.On the Airbus the computer calculates the approach speeds, a groundspeed mini is calculated. This speed takes headwind and tailwind into account (GS mini is variable during the approach) and gives you a safety margin in case of a windshear.
6.Remember it's always pilot error.
Insurer: It was pilot error.
Pilot: It was design error.
Insurer: I disagree. The pilot is at fault for trusting the designer.

User avatar
Avro
Posts: 8856
Joined: 28 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Avro »

That's an impressive picture 8O

Thanks for all those very interesting explanations guys.

Chris

Post Reply