They didn’t “miss” anything, just as FR and VY they just figured out more money can be made elsewhere.
BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
Moderator: Latest news team
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
Brussels Airlines is a strong competitor!nordikcam wrote: ↑07 Feb 2023, 20:13Yes they wanted to fly to those cities and finally don't fly to those cities for whatever reason...so they didn't impose themselves on BRU.
That's good.
Hasta la victoria siempre.
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
We could call it the "syndrome of Air Belgium" try randomly something and fail.nordikcam wrote: ↑07 Feb 2023, 20:13Yes they wanted to fly to those cities and finally don't fly to those cities for whatever reason...so they didn't impose themselves on BRU.
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
We could call it the "syndrome of Air Belgium" try randomly something and fail.
Or just call it the failure of Brussels Airport to attract these kind of companies
- Airbus330lover
- Posts: 859
- Joined: 21 Jul 2005, 00:00
- Location: Rixensart
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
Fail?? You must be joking! Between 2002 and today easyJet grew from 15 to 350 aircraft, Ryanair from 50 to 500, both posting nice profits year after year and surviving Covid19 without state aid. Not bad for just “trying randomly something and fail” isn’t it?
Once again they didn’t fail, more profitable opportunities arose and choices had to be made. Rest assured: the day they see a business opportunity in Brussels they won’t hesitate a second.
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
It's just maybe not a "failure" but a willingness not to have thise type of company
Last edited by crew1990 on 08 Feb 2023, 17:55, edited 1 time in total.
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
The failure I'm refering too is not about the airline, of course I consider Easyjet and Ryanair as success story. But when it comes to Easyjet and Ryanair at Brussels Airport, yes it's a big fail.fcw wrote: ↑08 Feb 2023, 14:51Fail?? You must be joking! Between 2002 and today easyJet grew from 15 to 350 aircraft, Ryanair from 50 to 500, both posting nice profits year after year and surviving Covid19 without state aid. Not bad for just “trying randomly something and fail” isn’t it?
Once again they didn’t fail, more profitable opportunities arose and choices had to be made. Rest assured: the day they see a business opportunity in Brussels they won’t hesitate a second.
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
Would you call it a big fail if someone left one company to earn twice or three times their salary, with even better working conditions, in another company?
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
Yes it's a fail, Ryanair established a base in BRU thinking they would run the show like in other airport but no, they failed to impose their rules and closed the base. In the case of easyjet in BRU they tried many routes and failed. Even on historical like Berlin and Milan routes they didn't manage to keep them.
Frustrated SN-bashers can say whatever they want about SN but SN still here for more than 20 years, and will be there for many more to comes... let them dream

Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
Exactly.crew1990 wrote: ↑08 Feb 2023, 20:21Yes it's a fail, Ryanair established a base in BRU thinking they would run the show like in other airport but no, they failed to impose their rules and closed the base. In the case of easyjet in BRU they tried many routes and failed. Even on historical like Berlin and Milan routes they didn't manage to keep them.
Frustrated SN-bashers can say whatever they want about SN but SN still here for more than 20 years, and will be there for many more to comes... let them dream![]()
Hasta la victoria siempre.
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
Milan because Alitalia is weak and in the meantime they disappeared.Airbus330lover wrote: ↑08 Feb 2023, 14:12I totally agree.....
Take a look at Milan, and see who fly there.
Hasta la victoria siempre.
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
Easyjet, Ryanair and Vueling all have failed in Brussels Airport.
Does Transavia have the ambition and desire to grow at BRU? And above all to succeed where others have failed!!
Does Transavia have the ambition and desire to grow at BRU? And above all to succeed where others have failed!!
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
As Transavia is a Dutch brand , it has a huge potential for dutch travellers
Once flew tfme ex BRU and the flight was 70% filled with dutch , loadfactor was 100%
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
Seriously... how old are you? Nobody is bashing SN here, and I didn't read frustration anywhere.
SN will still be there in 20 years if other companies (or the State) backs them up, yes.
Ryanair & Easyjet aren't anywhere close to needing money from someone else to survive.
Oh, and I'd rather see SN than this FR crap in BRU. Just to be clear.
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
Crew 1990- you are clearly looking at it from an emotional point of view, a point of view which is seldomly used by managers, this probably explains why you don’t understand the decision making process.
If you have more business opportunities than resources choices need to be made, whether you like it or not. Loco’s are continuously monitoring and ranking opportunities. The bean counters decide to open, close, shrink and grow routes in the blink of an eye. This has nothing to do with bashing or failing it’s just replacing the least profitable option by a more profitable one to maximise profit.
A fail would be buying aircraft to open a base, close the base and park the aircraft in the desert.
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
I do unsertand your point and yes you are right when you say that Ryanair and Easyjet leave BRU because they can make more money elsewhere. Still this is for me a failure because a couple of years ago Ryanair decided to open a base in BRU thinking they could do more money here as well, and at the end it didn't worked as they planed. Opening a base, investing in operational equipment, advertising new routes etc etc has a cost too.fcw wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 13:11Crew 1990- you are clearly looking at it from an emotional point of view, a point of view which is seldomly used by managers, this probably explains why you don’t understand the decision making process.
If you have more business opportunities than resources choices need to be made, whether you like it or not. Loco’s are continuously monitoring and ranking opportunities. The bean counters decide to open, close, shrink and grow routes in the blink of an eye. This has nothing to do with bashing or failing it’s just replacing the least profitable option by a more profitable one to maximise profit.
A fail would be buying aircraft to open a base, close the base and park the aircraft in the desert.
If I take the same anology that you did with someone going to work for another company because he get beter paid and beter working condion, it's not applicable here because in the case of Ryanair, the analogy would be a guy went for another job thinking he would get a beter salary and working condition but finally realised that it wasn't the case and the energy and ressources he puted in this has just vanished.
It's not about beeing emotional, Ryanair and Easyjet are a success story, nobody can deny it, but it's a big failure in Brussels. I think it's pointless to keep arguing on this as we just have different point of view. I do undertand your point, I just don't share it.
Re: BRU Summer 2023: news, new routes, airlines
I agree that Ryanair failed in BRU.
MOL's plan back in 2014 was to grow in BRU, while killing SN. Both objectives failed. Not only that, but he's the one withdrawing. This is obviously a fail. One can't deny that.
Luckily for him and his company, they are big enough to put their (few former Brussels based) planes elsewhere. So as a full company, he did not fail of course.
MOL's plan back in 2014 was to grow in BRU, while killing SN. Both objectives failed. Not only that, but he's the one withdrawing. This is obviously a fail. One can't deny that.
Luckily for him and his company, they are big enough to put their (few former Brussels based) planes elsewhere. So as a full company, he did not fail of course.