Which one is the best Camera ?

Share pictures, log-reports, special aircraft, nice events, hints and tips

Moderator: Plane spotting team

Post Reply
Mirror
Posts: 659
Joined: 20 May 2003, 00:00

Which one is the best Camera ?

Post by Mirror »

Wich on is the best :
Nikon D70 or Canon 300D?
Mirror

User avatar
Andries
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: OST
Contact:

Post by Andries »

There is NO better camera. On Luchtzak we have both D70 users and 300D users. But you cant tell from the result which camera they used ... The 300D and D70 both have their advantages and disadvantages ! The 300D, for instance, has got No Sevo AutoFocus, and only a 4-frame-buffer. The D70 on the other hand, has got severe problems with moiré and when shooting at high shutterspeeds, it also has a lot of problems with colours.

If you are planning on buying a new DSLR, you should first look at what you allready have. If you don't have anything, you can get a difficult choice ...

You should also check which lenses are available for your camera. I have been looking around for new lenses and I had the impression thet you could find more lenses for Canon then for Nikon. Probably because Canon makes more lenses then Nikon :?

What you should do is choose a budget (for example 1.500€) and then look at the possibilities. Lok around for cheap (but reliable) shops ...

You can see the characteristics of the D70 compared those of the 300D HERE

Greetz,

:twisted: Andries :twisted:
Don't dream your life, live your dream !!!


Mirror
Posts: 659
Joined: 20 May 2003, 00:00

Post by Mirror »

mmmmm its allready a difficalt choice,I have a F65 Nikon and a nikor 28-80+70-300 sigma
Mirror

User avatar
Andries
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: OST
Contact:

Post by Andries »

brusselsairport wrote:mmmmm its allready a difficalt choice,I have a F65 Nikon and a nikor 28-80+70-300 sigma
Do not doubt then, take the D70 ! It would be a waste of money to buy new lenses if your other lenses are perfectly ok ...

Greetz,

:twisted: Andries :twisted:
Don't dream your life, live your dream !!!

Mirror
Posts: 659
Joined: 20 May 2003, 00:00

Post by Mirror »

Thanks :D
Have A good Spotters weekend !!!!!
Mirror

User avatar
AN124
Posts: 1500
Joined: 16 Dec 2003, 00:00
Location: Maastricht (The Netherlands)

Post by AN124 »

I recent bought the D70 and I'm very happy with it.

Best Regards,
Yvo

User avatar
Avro
Posts: 8856
Joined: 28 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Avro »

Both cameras are very good, and the prize is nearly the same for both.

And if you allready have the Nikon lenses, then you really should go for the D70 !!!

Greetz
Chris
8)

User avatar
Vonsmalhausen
Posts: 1360
Joined: 31 Aug 2003, 00:00
Location: Linkebeek
Contact:

Post by Vonsmalhausen »

Avro wrote:Both cameras are very good, and the prize is nearly the same for both.

And if you allready have the Nikon lenses, then you really should go for the D70 !!!

Greetz
Chris
8)
yep, that's my opinion to :wink:

Mirror
Posts: 659
Joined: 20 May 2003, 00:00

Post by Mirror »

The last question wich one is the best the D100 or D70 ?
Mirror

User avatar
Andries
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: OST
Contact:

Post by Andries »

In theory the D100 is better. But I doubt it is worth the extra 400€'s ...
If I were you and you're not in a hurry, wait untill Photokina (28/09 till 03/10). Canon is very likely to announce a new camera there and Nikon knows that. You never know what Nikon has up it's sleeve ...

If you ARE in a hurry, I would buy a D70, not a D100 ...

Greetz,

:twisted: Andries :twisted:
Don't dream your life, live your dream !!!

User avatar
Lyulka
Posts: 555
Joined: 04 Dec 2002, 00:00
Location: EBBR
Contact:

Post by Lyulka »

I'm just wondering why people these days only consider digital cameras. I recently bought a decent analoge one (eos 300v) for less than halve the price of a digital!

aerobel
Posts: 36
Joined: 11 Dec 2002, 00:00
Location: Brugge (Belgium)
Contact:

Post by aerobel »

Lyulka wrote:I'm just wondering why people these days only consider digital cameras. I recently bought a decent analoge one (eos 300v) for less than halve the price of a digital!
When I return home from shooting pics: I can directly get my pics, process them an put 'm online. I don't have to buy films or slides... so much cheaper after all.

Tom ( happily shooting with Canon 10D)

User avatar
Lyulka
Posts: 555
Joined: 04 Dec 2002, 00:00
Location: EBBR
Contact:

Post by Lyulka »

To be honest, that's something I can't understand...
Do you still feel like it's the picture you shot when you need to process them? Ok, true, half of the pictures I take are useless, and so money is lost. But no mechanical failure will ever ruin my pictures! (who of you never had a HD which broke down, in a few years time R/W cd's can't be read anymore...)

aerobel
Posts: 36
Joined: 11 Dec 2002, 00:00
Location: Brugge (Belgium)
Contact:

Post by aerobel »

Yup processed pictures are still the pictures I took... But proccessing isn't more than some sharpening, or erasing some dust spots on the picture, getting a better composition. Photographers used to do that in their black-room... nowadays i do it with Photoshop.

HD's are indeed not failsafe. But my pictures are stored on my second HD and on my removable HD, to minimize the risks. And Back-ups on DVD are also in use here.

TOM

Post Reply