Incredible!!!
They have not been able to provide a system that shows more than the final destination or "first" origin of the flights!!!
Or maybe, it is well hidden?
Back to the old "panels" please...
Moderator: Latest news team
I read that some people considered the change as long overdue. The old site looked like 20 years old.Established02 wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 12:04 I have picked up only reactions of disappointment about this new website.
This has been done weeks ago, almost immediately after the new site was put online.
The remarks are taken into account and will be integrated into a future update of the site.
Yes it did, and was working satisfactorily...sn26567 wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 12:45 ..........some people considered the change as long overdue. The old site looked like 20 years old.
Some parts of the old site are gathered under a link "Other sites" that is found at the top right, next to the language selection. I do admit, it is not that obvious as it is in smaller print and somewhat out of visual focus points.CTBke wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 14:41 all needed info is removed, timetables, even their jobs page ... guess the most important thing is shopping rather than flights
But...when you check the arrival flight from Montego Bay you have to write Varadero...and when you check on what time is your flight to Varadero you have to write Montego Bay because on the outbound flight Varadero does not exist and on the inbound flight Montego Bay does not exist. I guess it's the same for African flight ! It's stupid...this new website is beautiful but does not work ! Again : STUPID !Boavida wrote: 27 Sep 2018, 12:44 Can I just throw this in: the new website www.brusselsairport.be is superb. The difference is like day and night with the (horrible) previous one. When you click on a flight, you got very detailed information about where to go, what to do, where to check in, on which belt to pick up luggage, etc.
It all feels intuitive and aesthetically pleasing. And it looks great on mobile devices. Finally a 21st century website.
Job well done !
Superb, maybe, but not giving the needed information. Typical of the "change for the sake of change" philosophy very popular nowadays.Boavida wrote: 27 Sep 2018, 12:44 Can I just throw this in: the new website www.brusselsairport.be is superb. The difference is like day and night with the (horrible) previous one. When you click on a flight, you got very detailed information about where to go, what to do, where to check in, on which belt to pick up luggage, etc.
It all feels intuitive and aesthetically pleasing. And it looks great on mobile devices. Finally a 21st century website.
Job well done !
convair wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 05:25 Incredible!!!
They have not been able to provide a system that shows more than the final destination or "first" origin of the flights!!!![]()
Back to the old "panels" please...
Precisely. Content and factual info become ever more secondary, "looks" and "user experience" are prime. And must be on the change permanently, for fear of loosing attention. Reminds one of adolescents in their first romantic relationships...Typical of the "change for the sake of change" philosophy very popular nowadays.
You can now find this when you click on the flight or 'details' and then somewhere on the right!ZavCity wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 10:19 Concerning the "info", we can not find anymore the type of aircraft operating amongst other changes except for cargo flights..
gtz
paul
Sorry, but this is not enough! If you look for the flight to Banjul tomorrow (flight SN203 at 11:30 am), click on "details", you find nowhere the information that the flight also stops at Dakar. Only final destinations/first origins are given!pitrixplanespotting wrote: 27 Sep 2018, 21:06You can now find this when you click on the flight or 'details' and then somewhere on the right!ZavCity wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 10:19 Concerning the "info", we can not find anymore the type of aircraft operating amongst other changes except for cargo flights..
gtz
paul![]()
There you have a valid point. A new site should not be put online unless it has at least as much information as the old one. It's not a trial and error game.convair wrote: 27 Sep 2018, 21:42 I suggest they go back to the old, developed site, until the new one is ready to correctly inform the pax.