09/11 United 767 had rocket launcher ...

Andries · Post by **Andries** » 19 Apr 2004, 08:53

Just found this link trough a topic in the A.net forum.

http://www.letsroll911.org/

This guy clames the United 767 that crashed into the WTC had a rocked launcher and he has proof

If you scroll down until your halfway, you'll see some sort of movie where you can actually see the rocket being launched ...

Come on, get real !!! What a loser. He starts to sound just like WILOO ...

Greetz,

Andries

Post by **luchtzak** » 19 Apr 2004, 11:04

I think it's just an explosion of the impact, maybe the hijackers forgot depressurisation?

Wasn't there another website claiming that there wasn't an impact into the White House with 9/11 incidents? Forgot the url though...

greetings,

Bart
:rock:

Post by **sn26567** » 19 Apr 2004, 11:10

luchtzak wrote:Wasn't there another website claiming that there wasn't an impact into the White House with 9/11 incidents? Forgot the url though...

It was the Pentagon, not the White House. A French author made a fortune by publishing books in all languages about it. But he was fundamentally biased in his approach: he first claimed there was no impact into the Pentagon, and then published all the data that could support his thesis and dismissed everything that went against it.

He never went to Washington to interview the eye-witnesses...

Buzz · Post by **Buzz** » 19 Apr 2004, 11:12

luchtzak wrote:Wasn't there another website claiming that there wasn't an impact into the White House with 9/11 incidents? Forgot the url though...

I think everyone is claiming that, because it was the Pentagon

I've seen that site allso, it's
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/ ... s%5Fen.htm (Thank you Google)
the photo's are strange though, unless they have drawn a bigger plane or something like that..

Post by **sn26567** » 19 Apr 2004, 11:13

Here is his French website, translated into English:
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/ ... urs_en.htm

Post by **luchtzak** » 19 Apr 2004, 11:21

sn26567 wrote:Here is his French website, translated into English:
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/ ... urs_en.htm

Thanks André and Buzz! It's amazing

Captain · Post by **Captain** » 19 Apr 2004, 12:25

Well, hundred's of consipiracy theories were 'made up' after the Sept 11 attacks.

I like story of how they authorities 'found' one of the hijackers (Mohammed Atta) passport in the rubble of the world trade center only 2-3 days after the crash!

Captain.

Avro · Post by **Avro** » 19 Apr 2004, 18:40

How ridiculous !!! The reason for that little explosion near the plane can be many other things !!!!

BTW imagine that this would indeed be a missile. The result would have be the same, since the plane damages the bulding much more than this little explotion.

Chris

L-1011 · Post by **L-1011** » 20 Apr 2004, 13:09

For me this is clearly not a missile. I'll tell you why:

When you see the whole plane on a video that is slowed down (as they show on the site) you clearly see that the plane as it is rotating starts to reflect the sunshine. Infact you see a sunlight reflection in front of the wing (they claim it is the missile) and you see one behind the wing (they don't talk about it).

In addition to that you don't see any missile underwing or anywhere under the plane when it turns to align. But tenths of seconds later the "missile" is launched. I don't know of any pod being able to open that fast.

As for the Pentagon. There is stil a large site about the fatc that there couldn't have been a 757..
I'll leave this open to discussion....

It's on http://www.reseauvoltaire.net

I must admit there are some disturbing points about the Pentagon 911 incident, but nevertheless a plane crashed there.

ciao,
TriStar

MR · Post by MR » 20 Apr 2004, 20:51

For what concerns the Pentagon
I thought there was said short after the actions that the boeing first aimed for the White House and then banked to the Pentagon. In that case the boeing hit the Pentagon under an angle and very low to the ground. So the impact was aiming closely to the ground with maximum of braking action.

nwa757 · Post by **nwa757** » 21 Apr 2004, 01:07

MR wrote:For what concerns the Pentagon
I thought there was said short after the actions that the boeing first aimed for the White House and then banked to the Pentagon. In that case the boeing hit the Pentagon under an angle and very low to the ground. So the impact was aiming closely to the ground with maximum of braking action.

I have heard that the United 757 that was brought down by the passengers was headed for the white house. Anyways, it wouldn't have done much good, since President Bush was reading to some elementary school students on 9/11.