EXIT signs on aircraft
Moderator: Latest news team
EXIT signs on aircraft
Are there any kind of regulations on the type of EXIT signs that have to be used on (new) aircraft?
It is considered one of the most important items as passengers are briefed on this before every flight.
We used to see the classic red EXIT - lettered sign, sometimes accompanied by another language.
Since Boeing 787 (I think) they started to use the green ‘Running Man’ exit sign which is considered the standard emergency exit sign by the International Standard Organisation (ISO) in everyday life worldwide.
The ‘running man’ is argued, amongst other advantages, to be understood amongst different cultures, languages, etc.…which imo seems a ‘plus’ in aviation.
However it seems now a mix of both signs is used and it doesn’t seem to be an ‘old vs new aircraft’-issue. My observations:
Boeing 737 NG: classic EXIT sign
Boeing 737 MAX:
Boeing 787: Green Running Man, however I saw a pic of a UA B787 with the classic EXIT sign
Airbus A 350: Green Running Man
Airbus A 320: classic EXIT sign
Bombardier CS 100: Green Running Man
Sukhoi SSJ: classic EXIT sign
Other:
So it doesn’t seem to be a case of ‘old vs new’ or ‘Boeing vs Airbus’ or ‘US vs Europe following ISO’
Furthermore it seems on Airbus exit signs are lit during the entire flight
as on Boeing they are only lit during an emergency or power loss…
Can airlines or aircraft manufacturers choose and wouldn’t it be better to use the same sign or are there maybe regulations in place already?
Google isn’t of much help, so thought maybe some people on the forum have an idea…
It is considered one of the most important items as passengers are briefed on this before every flight.
We used to see the classic red EXIT - lettered sign, sometimes accompanied by another language.
Since Boeing 787 (I think) they started to use the green ‘Running Man’ exit sign which is considered the standard emergency exit sign by the International Standard Organisation (ISO) in everyday life worldwide.
The ‘running man’ is argued, amongst other advantages, to be understood amongst different cultures, languages, etc.…which imo seems a ‘plus’ in aviation.
However it seems now a mix of both signs is used and it doesn’t seem to be an ‘old vs new aircraft’-issue. My observations:
Boeing 737 NG: classic EXIT sign
Boeing 737 MAX:
Boeing 787: Green Running Man, however I saw a pic of a UA B787 with the classic EXIT sign
Airbus A 350: Green Running Man
Airbus A 320: classic EXIT sign
Bombardier CS 100: Green Running Man
Sukhoi SSJ: classic EXIT sign
Other:
So it doesn’t seem to be a case of ‘old vs new’ or ‘Boeing vs Airbus’ or ‘US vs Europe following ISO’
Furthermore it seems on Airbus exit signs are lit during the entire flight
as on Boeing they are only lit during an emergency or power loss…
Can airlines or aircraft manufacturers choose and wouldn’t it be better to use the same sign or are there maybe regulations in place already?
Google isn’t of much help, so thought maybe some people on the forum have an idea…
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
Interesting (and important) question. I never paid too much attention to those signs, but I should, as it relates to safety.
I think that both signs are clearly understood all over the world. The word EXIT itself is not only English, but also Latin and thus quite universal. The green running man also has a meaning that nobody can ignore.
To me, both signs can coexist: both are clear enough to the common people.
I think that both signs are clearly understood all over the world. The word EXIT itself is not only English, but also Latin and thus quite universal. The green running man also has a meaning that nobody can ignore.
To me, both signs can coexist: both are clear enough to the common people.
André
ex Sabena #26567
ex Sabena #26567
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
Hello
This is something which is defined in the Certification specifications of the aircraft.
For these ones, it's the CS-25 in EASA environment or the PART 25 in FAA environment.
Paragraph 25.811 clearly defines what you should use as an emergency exit marking.
In the EASA CS-25 it leaves the door open for either the word 'EXIT' or a universal symbolic exit sign.
In the FAR PART 25, it only states you can use the word "exit". Which means there is a difference between US and EU regulations and probably also Airbus and Boeing.
Now, I do remark there is a 'CRI' on the emergency exit marking (not on detail, just mentioned) in the EASA Type certificate of the 787... Might be kind of a deviation on the marking maybe?
This is something which is defined in the Certification specifications of the aircraft.
For these ones, it's the CS-25 in EASA environment or the PART 25 in FAA environment.
Paragraph 25.811 clearly defines what you should use as an emergency exit marking.
In the EASA CS-25 it leaves the door open for either the word 'EXIT' or a universal symbolic exit sign.
In the FAR PART 25, it only states you can use the word "exit". Which means there is a difference between US and EU regulations and probably also Airbus and Boeing.
Now, I do remark there is a 'CRI' on the emergency exit marking (not on detail, just mentioned) in the EASA Type certificate of the 787... Might be kind of a deviation on the marking maybe?
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
Thanks for your explanations, feniks, and welcome to Luchtzak!
André
ex Sabena #26567
ex Sabena #26567
- quixoticguide
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 18:41
- Location: Pyongyang, DPRK
- Contact:
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
interesting topic: the Air Koryo IL-18 has a Red Exit sign.
Visit my flights on: http://www.quixoticguide.com
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
Always a good idea to take a picture of the Exit sign!
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
Thanks feniks,
You provided a good starting point to investigate.
According to the docs I found on EASA's website my understanding is that both (EXIT vs. symbolic sign) are accepted by EASA, as long as it is consistently used and fulfills all sorts of other requirements, etc.
So until now I would say it appears a choice of the Boeing designers/engineers of the B787 to start using the green running man.
Didn't have the time to check FAA's docs but can only assume it's the same as AA also uses the symbolic sign on B787 (opposed to UA B787 as an exception)
However the first B737MAX (Malindo Air) seems to use the classic EXIT sign again...Opposed to what I would expect on a 'new' aircraft.
So it remains a mystery after all
Curious what (European) Airbus will do with their neo's.
You provided a good starting point to investigate.
According to the docs I found on EASA's website my understanding is that both (EXIT vs. symbolic sign) are accepted by EASA, as long as it is consistently used and fulfills all sorts of other requirements, etc.
So until now I would say it appears a choice of the Boeing designers/engineers of the B787 to start using the green running man.
Didn't have the time to check FAA's docs but can only assume it's the same as AA also uses the symbolic sign on B787 (opposed to UA B787 as an exception)
However the first B737MAX (Malindo Air) seems to use the classic EXIT sign again...Opposed to what I would expect on a 'new' aircraft.
So it remains a mystery after all
Curious what (European) Airbus will do with their neo's.
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
Hi
I assume the Boeing 737 has started of with a type design based on the FAR (US) regulations.
Which means they could only have the "EXIT" marking certified as this is what FAR 25.811 obliges to.
FAR 25 does not have the possibility to use the green man so far...
I see in the type certificate a EASA CRI mentioned again for the 737-8 "MAX" on the FAR 25.811 certification base.
Maybe they do leave the door open to have them installed on the "European" 737, just a guess.
I assume the Boeing 737 has started of with a type design based on the FAR (US) regulations.
Which means they could only have the "EXIT" marking certified as this is what FAR 25.811 obliges to.
FAR 25 does not have the possibility to use the green man so far...
I see in the type certificate a EASA CRI mentioned again for the 737-8 "MAX" on the FAR 25.811 certification base.
Maybe they do leave the door open to have them installed on the "European" 737, just a guess.
-
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: 24 Feb 2007, 18:28
- Location: 2300NM due South of North Pole
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
I am definitely in favour of the pictogram.
EXIT, even with possible translation in a second language doesn't stand the comparison when you want to communicate universally.
I took this pic during a calibration flight earlier this year and the addition of the Bahasa Indonesia wording does not make it any clearer that this is supposed to be an exit way.
H.A.
EXIT, even with possible translation in a second language doesn't stand the comparison when you want to communicate universally.
I took this pic during a calibration flight earlier this year and the addition of the Bahasa Indonesia wording does not make it any clearer that this is supposed to be an exit way.
H.A.
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
Doesn't seem like an exit, looking at the pile of luggage in front of itHomo Aeroportus wrote: ↑05 Jul 2017, 21:46 I am definitely in favour of the pictogram.
EXIT, even with possible translation in a second language doesn't stand the comparison when you want to communicate universally.
I took this pic during a calibration flight earlier this year and the addition of the Bahasa Indonesia wording does not make it any clearer that this is supposed to be an exit way.
Exit kind of.JPG
H.A.
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
Hey mate what do u showing us, exit or that beauty ? )) too bad i'm injured now.. really miss the planes... instead i must stay at home ... good things there are these forums where i can forget a bit about problems.quixoticguide wrote: ↑19 Jun 2017, 14:35
interesting topic: the Air Koryo IL-18 has a Red Exit sign.
Last edited by sn26567 on 16 May 2018, 18:18, edited 3 times in total.
Reason: removed advertisement
Reason: removed advertisement
-
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: 24 Feb 2007, 18:28
- Location: 2300NM due South of North Pole
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
I had the same reaction, hence the photo, but we were only four on board (Beech King Air 200) and I had no real safety concern. Just a bit out of ordinary.luchtzak wrote: ↑05 Jul 2017, 22:24Doesn't seem like an exit, looking at the pile of luggage in front of itHomo Aeroportus wrote: ↑05 Jul 2017, 21:46 I am definitely in favour of the pictogram.
EXIT, even with possible translation in a second language doesn't stand the comparison when you want to communicate universally.
I took this pic during a calibration flight earlier this year and the addition of the Bahasa Indonesia wording does not make it any clearer that this is supposed to be an exit way.
Exit kind of.JPG
H.A.
As was the hundred times repeated aural warning "Too Low, Gear ; Too Low, Gear ; ..." but OK no worries. Real good pilots from DGCA with all the fun of an afternoon flight at low level and near the equator
H.A.
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
Hello all.
Scott from US clarifying regulations in this country.
Historically the US has been behind in international standards such as symbolic exit signs and more notably the SI system of measurement. In around 2014, Boeing did petition the US FAA to allow the running man in place of "exit" word signs. The FAA approved and it is now allowed on both passenger and transport category aircraft. Link to one of their study below:
https://www.faa.gov/data_research/resea ... 201403.pdf
The running man is also starting to be used in US tunnels and in some low level exit signs in hi-rise buildings. NYC even has a law requiring this symbol many times. That said, running man is still not permitted as the main exit sign in US buildings and when it comes to airplanes your comments appear to suggest some airlines are opting to use it and some are not.
Scott from US clarifying regulations in this country.
Historically the US has been behind in international standards such as symbolic exit signs and more notably the SI system of measurement. In around 2014, Boeing did petition the US FAA to allow the running man in place of "exit" word signs. The FAA approved and it is now allowed on both passenger and transport category aircraft. Link to one of their study below:
https://www.faa.gov/data_research/resea ... 201403.pdf
The running man is also starting to be used in US tunnels and in some low level exit signs in hi-rise buildings. NYC even has a law requiring this symbol many times. That said, running man is still not permitted as the main exit sign in US buildings and when it comes to airplanes your comments appear to suggest some airlines are opting to use it and some are not.
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
Thanks for your clarifications, sbrody, and welcome to Luchtzak.
André
ex Sabena #26567
ex Sabena #26567
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
It looks like this Thomas Cook Airlines Belgium A320 OO-TCX has been used by a German airline in a previous life:
André
ex Sabena #26567
ex Sabena #26567
- quixoticguide
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 18:41
- Location: Pyongyang, DPRK
- Contact:
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
OO-TCX was delivered to Condor in 2001 as D-AICI
Visit my flights on: http://www.quixoticguide.com
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
To add some of my observations to the listSai wrote: ↑18 Jun 2017, 17:29 Boeing 737 NG: classic EXIT sign
Boeing 737 MAX:
Boeing 787: Green Running Man, however I saw a pic of a UA B787 with the classic EXIT sign
Airbus A 350: Green Running Man
Airbus A 320: classic EXIT sign
Bombardier CS 100: Green Running Man
Sukhoi SSJ: classic EXIT sign
Other:
Bombardier CS 300: Green Running man
Boeing 737 MAX: classic EXIT sign
- Vic Diesel
- Posts: 340
- Joined: 06 Feb 2018, 10:10
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
Overwing exit on Air Koryo's Il-18 (last one worldwide to conduct scheduled pax flights, btw):
Notice the small compartment, obviously storing EMERGENCY ROPE, so that you would not have to JUMP from the wing. And "EMERGENCY EXIT" - maybe just to remind that this small hatch is not really for routinely leaving the aircraft...
And if your eyes are good enough, there is some other detail to spot in the picture as well...
Notice the small compartment, obviously storing EMERGENCY ROPE, so that you would not have to JUMP from the wing. And "EMERGENCY EXIT" - maybe just to remind that this small hatch is not really for routinely leaving the aircraft...
And if your eyes are good enough, there is some other detail to spot in the picture as well...
Best regards,
Viktor
(Budapest-born, Vienna-raised, Brussels-based)
Viktor
(Budapest-born, Vienna-raised, Brussels-based)
-
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: 24 Feb 2007, 18:28
- Location: 2300NM due South of North Pole
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
BCS1, HB-JBB, BRU-ZRH last year.
Behind this curtain you have access to door 1L on your left, and ...
So I asked the "Maitre de Cabine" if the cockpit was an intended escape route.
She answered "Ja, I have also noticed zis and made a report. I don't sink zis is normal".
H.A.
Behind this curtain you have access to door 1L on your left, and ...
So I asked the "Maitre de Cabine" if the cockpit was an intended escape route.
She answered "Ja, I have also noticed zis and made a report. I don't sink zis is normal".
H.A.
Re: EXIT signs on aircraft
hahaha Quite ambigious indeedHomo Aeroportus wrote: ↑30 Apr 2018, 11:29 So I asked the "Maitre de Cabine" if the cockpit was an intended escape route.
She answered "Ja, I have also noticed zis and made a report. I don't sink zis is normal".
H.A.