Boavida wrote: 22 Mar 2017, 22:31Just compare the times when the different jets were designed. Lots of 'previous generation' designs. The Rafale for example was designed in the late 1970's(!).
So yes, the F-35 is the most advanced. It would be plain stupid for Belgium to buy a previous generation fighter in 2018.
It's like buying a Nokia 3310 in a world of high tech smartphones.
Btw, at the time the F16 was the newest jet it was also expensive and had a lot of 'problems' in its early years. Outcome: we're still flying it today.
The actual Rafale (the F3R standard is a far cry from the prototype which first flew in 1986... you should have a look at the programme history). The program itself has a robust development roadmap with the F4 standard having been approved and funded by the french governement a few days ago.
The BAF would be quite stupid indeed to buy a high tech smartphone which cannot even send a text message or made a call.
F-16 had problem at his times but he was - at least - able to perform the basic missions he was destined for. That's not the case for the F-35. But yeah definitely a "good choice" if made...
I wouldn't mind Belgium buying either one plane or another, but I can't accept that our state spends so much money on a plane (the F-35A to name it) which would bring clearly NOTHING to our air force. For an horrendous price and unable to perform basic duties. And I didn't even speak about the total lack of economic benefits for our national industries (oh yes, they're mainly based in Wallonia, maybe that's why...?) added to the doubts surrounding the program with the new POTUS.
The F-35A is - for the time being and at least in a close future - one massively expensive joke...