![Image](https://farm1.staticflickr.com/703/21560702373_d5d63956ce_z.jpg)
Photo (c) Woody Aeroimages on Flickr
Best regards,
Ivan
Moderator: Latest news team
That's another story! Not only is Boeing late, but the costs are likely to climb even more. If the U.S. Air Force had confirmed its initial choice of a reliable existing aircraft, the A330MRTT, they would have had their tankers by now, and another large Airbus plant in the U.S.RC20 wrote:Well we heard that on the 767 tanker program, its something like 1.5 billion in the red.
sn26567 wrote:That's another story! Not only is Boeing late, but the costs are likely to climb even more. If the U.S. Air Force had confirmed its initial choice of a reliable existing aircraft, the A330MRTT, they would have had their tankers by now, and another large Airbus plant in the U.S.RC20 wrote:Well we heard that on the 767 tanker program, its something like 1.5 billion in the red.
But this is off topic...