sn26567 wrote:Welcome to Luchtzak, stragke.stragke wrote:bru --> bru
SN 3591 returned to bru after descending but not landing in lyon (other planes had landed).
Do you know what happened?
Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
Moderator: Latest news team
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
OO-JDL is moving. Take off very soon now.nordikcam wrote:And what's happened with TB 503 BRU Varadero Cancun...16 hours delay ! Impressive...787 !!!
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
Thx...poor passengers !Passenger wrote:OO-JDL is moving. Take off very soon now.nordikcam wrote:And what's happened with TB 503 BRU Varadero Cancun...16 hours delay ! Impressive...787 !!!
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
I guess no landing permission (in regard to terrorist attack)sn26567 wrote:Welcome to Luchtzak, stragke.stragke wrote:bru --> bru
SN 3591 returned to bru after descending but not landing in lyon (other planes had landed).
Do you know what happened?
otherwise I have no clue.
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
Atco EBBR wrote:Nose gear problems. Landed 25R 20 min ago, had to be towed to the stand (but was able to vacate the runway without assistance).
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
Say what now? So they broke off the apporach and flew back to BRU just for a small gear problem??nordikcam wrote:Atco EBBR wrote:Nose gear problems. Landed 25R 20 min ago, had to be towed to the stand (but was able to vacate the runway without assistance).
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
In LYS the aircraft would be stuck for a day or maybe two, whilst engineers and spares are flown in, whilst in BRU the aircraft may be serviceable again in a couple of hours.sean1982 wrote:Say what now? So they broke off the apporach and flew back to BRU just for a small gear problem??nordikcam wrote:Atco EBBR wrote:Nose gear problems. Landed 25R 20 min ago, had to be towed to the stand (but was able to vacate the runway without assistance).
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
What is your source that is was "just a small gear problem"?sean1982 wrote:Say what now? So they broke off the apporach and flew back to BRU just for a small gear problem??Atco EBBR wrote:Nose gear problems. Landed 25R 20 min ago, had to be towed to the stand (but was able to vacate the runway without assistance).
We know that the aircraft was able to vacate the runway at BRU, but had to be towed to the stand. Me thinks that the crew wanted to avoid that the aircraft became stuck in Lyon, causing delays for a lot more passengers (still Brussels Airlines' first priority).
You work for a competitor airline, and that is probably (and once again) the reason for your sarcastic reply about Brussels Airlines. May I remind you that one of your B777's returned home last week after six hours flying, also for a minor technical problem as The Aviation Herald reported: "The airline reported a minor technical fault prompted the return" - see http://avherald.com/h?article=49ae8a9c&opt=0
By the way: OO-SSW picked up the stranded pax at Lyon yesterday evening.
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
Jetairfly's TB-504 OO-JDL (787) from Varadero/Cancun: ETA 06h15 is now delayed till 19h57 tonight.
Next flight TB-601 to Punta Cana had an ETD Saturday morning 09h00. This has been delayed into 20h00. Actually, all passengers (and/or their travel agents) have been advised a schedule change into 20h00.
Me thinks it would have been more polite from Jetair/Jetairfly to announce 21h30 as new departure time, because it was known that the 787 couldn't arrive in BRU before 20h today.
Next flight TB-601 to Punta Cana had an ETD Saturday morning 09h00. This has been delayed into 20h00. Actually, all passengers (and/or their travel agents) have been advised a schedule change into 20h00.
Me thinks it would have been more polite from Jetair/Jetairfly to announce 21h30 as new departure time, because it was known that the 787 couldn't arrive in BRU before 20h today.
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
And everyday too one of those SN african flights has a loooong delay ! Today the Accra's flight...Now more than 3 hours !!!!!!! What's happen ? Technical problems ? Transit passengers problems ?
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
A too high utilisation rate of the aircraft, as predicted by some here a while ago. If SN wants to offer real service to their guest, they need a backup 330.nordikcam wrote:And everyday too one of those SN african flights has a loooong delay ! Today the Accra's flight...Now more than 3 hours !!!!!!! What's happen ? Technical problems ? Transit passengers problems ?
In case of a little mishap it takes days to absorb the delay, the same happens to OO-JDL.
Last edited by Poiu on 16 Jul 2016, 21:54, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
I was surprised,the flights to FIH are making a stop at Douala again this summer?
Hasta la victoria siempre.
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
Only one time a week...the saturday flight !lumumba wrote:I was surprised,the flights to FIH are making a stop at Douala again this summer?
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
Ok thxnordikcam wrote:Only one time a week...the saturday flight !lumumba wrote:I was surprised,the flights to FIH are making a stop at Douala again this summer?
Hasta la victoria siempre.
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
There is much more to that story.You will need to contact the BA press office for that.There was nothing sarcastic about either. When you are able to taxi of the runway then the problem is indeed minor, this was nothing more than a money excercise. True the aircraft would have been AOG but Im sure SN has enough contingency in place for that.Passenger wrote:What is your source that is was "just a small gear problem"?sean1982 wrote:Say what now? So they broke off the apporach and flew back to BRU just for a small gear problem??Atco EBBR wrote:Nose gear problems. Landed 25R 20 min ago, had to be towed to the stand (but was able to vacate the runway without assistance).
We know that the aircraft was able to vacate the runway at BRU, but had to be towed to the stand. Me thinks that the crew wanted to avoid that the aircraft became stuck in Lyon, causing delays for a lot more passengers (still Brussels Airlines' first priority).
You work for a competitor airline, and that is probably (and once again) the reason for your sarcastic reply about Brussels Airlines. May I remind you that one of your B777's returned home last week after six hours flying, also for a minor technical problem as The Aviation Herald reported: "The airline reported a minor technical fault prompted the return" - see http://avherald.com/h?article=49ae8a9c&opt=0
By the way: OO-SSW picked up the stranded pax at Lyon yesterday evening.
by the way i wish it was "my B777" but unfortunatly it was a british airways one. Let's not overdramatise shall we?
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
And a new sunday with long haul fleet's problem ! Two problems...IAD : 10 hours delay ! YYZ : cancelled !
An airbus stuck somewhere ?
An airbus stuck somewhere ?
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
On Saturday 16 July, Brussels Airlines flight SN3783 to Las Palmas (Gran Canaria), operated by A320 OO-SNG, had to return to BRU for a technical problem. It landed overweight (71.2 tonnes, 5t over the maximum) and was thus attended by the fire brigade to control an eventual overheating of the brakes.
The same aircraft eventually took off again with a delay of 2 hr 40 min.
The same aircraft eventually took off again with a delay of 2 hr 40 min.
André
ex Sabena #26567
ex Sabena #26567
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
Brussels Airlines passengers stranded in Rome following the cancellation of a flight
At present, only one passenger has no solution for a speedy return to Belgium.
145 Brussels Airlines passengers have been stranded at the airport of Rome. A technical problem was detected in the aircraft while they were boarding.
Their flight was scheduled for 17:45 Saturday. But because of the coup attempt in Turkey and strong winds, a number of flights were cancelled.
Brussels Airlines tried to accommodate a maximum of passengers, says the company.
But from the passenger point of view, the sound is not the same: "There is absolutely no care of the people by the company," said Frederic Jacob, one of the passengers on the flight.
"We have to take care of ourselves for the reservation of a hotel and as it is summer, all hotels in the airport area are full. We must also manage to find alternative flights as the company decided not to charter another plane."
Frédéric Jacob says they have not received any news from the company, no message, phone call or email from Brussels Airlines with the aim to find a solution for their return to Belgium.
Brussels Airlines apologises and explained on Sunday morning that the company will reimburse the hotel night and basic needs of passengers following the cancellation: "Many passengers were already stranded due to flight cancellations to Turkey. We have done our best but we did not always find a hotel. any costs will obviously be refunded. They will receive 250 euros. Our priority is to find a solution for the return, even via a flight on another airline," said the spokesman for Brussels Airlines.
All passengers have been able to return on a flight scheduled on Sunday or Monday.
Source: RTBF
At present, only one passenger has no solution for a speedy return to Belgium.
145 Brussels Airlines passengers have been stranded at the airport of Rome. A technical problem was detected in the aircraft while they were boarding.
Their flight was scheduled for 17:45 Saturday. But because of the coup attempt in Turkey and strong winds, a number of flights were cancelled.
Brussels Airlines tried to accommodate a maximum of passengers, says the company.
But from the passenger point of view, the sound is not the same: "There is absolutely no care of the people by the company," said Frederic Jacob, one of the passengers on the flight.
"We have to take care of ourselves for the reservation of a hotel and as it is summer, all hotels in the airport area are full. We must also manage to find alternative flights as the company decided not to charter another plane."
Frédéric Jacob says they have not received any news from the company, no message, phone call or email from Brussels Airlines with the aim to find a solution for their return to Belgium.
Brussels Airlines apologises and explained on Sunday morning that the company will reimburse the hotel night and basic needs of passengers following the cancellation: "Many passengers were already stranded due to flight cancellations to Turkey. We have done our best but we did not always find a hotel. any costs will obviously be refunded. They will receive 250 euros. Our priority is to find a solution for the return, even via a flight on another airline," said the spokesman for Brussels Airlines.
All passengers have been able to return on a flight scheduled on Sunday or Monday.
Source: RTBF
André
ex Sabena #26567
ex Sabena #26567
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
NOTAM for 21/07/2016, national holiday and military parade.
No arrivals and departures will be possible from 14:10 till 14:36 at BRU.
No arrivals and departures will be possible from 14:10 till 14:36 at BRU.
NOTAM défilé militaire aérien A2220/16
21 JUL 16 14:10 - 16 14:36
NO DEP OR ARR POSSIBLE DUE TO ACTIVATION OF TRA21 (SEE NOTAM B3266/16)
-
jan_olieslagers
- Posts: 3082
- Joined: 24 Jun 2006, 08:34
- Location: Vl.Brabant
- Contact:
Re: Abnormalities in BRU-ANR-CRL-LGG-OST in 2016
Ah, it's that time of the year again , yes ...