Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

Post Reply
crew1990
Posts: 1625
Joined: 29 Dec 2010, 21:46

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by crew1990 »

What do you mean by terminal 2? The A pear extension?

convair
Posts: 2039
Joined: 18 Nov 2011, 00:02

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by convair »

Atlantis wrote:There is a plan for a big parking place yes.
Not in Wavre or Keerbergen I hope! :roll:

User avatar
Conti764
Posts: 2024
Joined: 21 Sep 2007, 23:21

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by Conti764 »

crew1990 wrote:What do you mean by terminal 2? The A pear extension?
Nope. A new terminal like the current one, with check-in facilities etc...

crew1990
Posts: 1625
Joined: 29 Dec 2010, 21:46

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by crew1990 »

You mean to double the capacity of the airport? But where will they find a place to build another terminal as big as the curent one as the airport is already surrounded of villages and houses?

User avatar
Atlantis
Posts: 5577
Joined: 12 Apr 2005, 00:00

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by Atlantis »

crew1990 wrote:You mean to double the capacity of the airport? But where will they find a place to build another terminal as big as the curent one as the airport is already surrounded of villages and houses?
No, no, not to double the capacity of the airport but to bring all check-in facilities of Star under one roof. Terminal 2, T2, will come on the place where you have now the huge and totally empty DHL Building 2. This is the one next to the Diamant.

The current terminal 1, T1, is now really crowded when you walk each day in the departure hall. You hardly can move. T1 will be foreseen for all airlines except Star and Leisure carriers.

The users of the Leisure terminal are very happy with the very light, spacious, wide terminal. In the future it can be extended with two or three more extra check-in lanes. That's already foreseen.

The terminals: T1, T2 and the Leisure terminal will have an L-shape then when you will see it from above.

User avatar
Atlantis
Posts: 5577
Joined: 12 Apr 2005, 00:00

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by Atlantis »

crew1990 wrote:What do you mean by terminal 2? The A pear extension?

T2 and the A Pier West extension are two separated projects but still under one umbrella: Star

User avatar
Atlantis
Posts: 5577
Joined: 12 Apr 2005, 00:00

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by Atlantis »

convair wrote:
Atlantis wrote:There is a plan for a big parking place yes.
Not in Wavre or Keerbergen I hope! :roll:
For you it will be close ;)
If the plan/idea will be realised then it will be very close.

crew1990
Posts: 1625
Joined: 29 Dec 2010, 21:46

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by crew1990 »

Atlantis wrote:
crew1990 wrote:You mean to double the capacity of the airport? But where will they find a place to build another terminal as big as the curent one as the airport is already surrounded of villages and houses?
No, no, not to double the capacity of the airport but to bring all check-in facilities of Star under one roof. Terminal 2, T2, will come on the place where you have now the huge and totally empty DHL Building 2. This is the one next to the Diamant.

The current terminal 1, T1, is now really crowded when you walk each day in the departure hall. You hardly can move. T1 will be foreseen for all airlines except Star and Leisure carriers.

The users of the Leisure terminal are very happy with the very light, spacious, wide terminal. In the future it can be extended with two or three more extra check-in lanes. That's already foreseen.

The terminals: T1, T2 and the Leisure terminal will have an L-shape then when you will see it from above.
Ok I see :-)

So terminal 2 only be for the checkin facilities, but there will be no gates for the aircraft in the apron side of the terminal isn't it?

convair
Posts: 2039
Joined: 18 Nov 2011, 00:02

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by convair »

crew1990 wrote:terminal 2 only be for the checkin facilities, but there will be no gates for the aircraft in the apron side of the terminal isn't it?
Quite a long walk from T2 to pier B then...

crew1990
Posts: 1625
Joined: 29 Dec 2010, 21:46

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by crew1990 »

Then would'n it be a better idea to built a kind of terminal going from the curent hall of departure to Abelag the the check in facilities land side and the gate airside. It would be a better use of the space to me, and less walking distance for the star alliance passenger.

teach
Posts: 740
Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 00:00

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by teach »

Atlantis wrote: The users of the Leisure terminal are very happy with the very light, spacious, wide terminal. In the future it can be extended with two or three more extra check-in lanes. That's already foreseen.
Where are they going to put those extra lanes? I don't see how they can extend the building, as the new Deloitte building is in the way.

teach
Posts: 740
Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 00:00

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by teach »

convair wrote:Quite a long walk from T2 to pier B then...
Not really. If I'm not mistaken, the plan is for B pier passengers to go through security and passport control using the Connector entrance and screening platform once the connector is completely finished. In that case, the walk won't be longer for T2 passengers than for T1 passengers, and shorter than the walk for Leisure terminal passengers.

User avatar
Atlantis
Posts: 5577
Joined: 12 Apr 2005, 00:00

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by Atlantis »

convair wrote:
crew1990 wrote:terminal 2 only be for the checkin facilities, but there will be no gates for the aircraft in the apron side of the terminal isn't it?
Quite a long walk from T2 to pier B then...
No, not at all because that's the reason why the security check is now right in the middle and together for pier A and B.
Terminal 2 will connect with the new security check area.

crew1990
Posts: 1625
Joined: 29 Dec 2010, 21:46

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by crew1990 »

But why to loose this space apron side while they could put some some gate!

User avatar
Atlantis
Posts: 5577
Joined: 12 Apr 2005, 00:00

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by Atlantis »

teach wrote:
Atlantis wrote: The users of the Leisure terminal are very happy with the very light, spacious, wide terminal. In the future it can be extended with two or three more extra check-in lanes. That's already foreseen.
Where are they going to put those extra lanes? I don't see how they can extend the building, as the new Deloitte building is in the way.
The Deloitte building has nothing to do with it. Behind the last lanes is the space already foreseen for extra new lanes

User avatar
Atlantis
Posts: 5577
Joined: 12 Apr 2005, 00:00

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by Atlantis »

crew1990 wrote:But why to loose this space apron side while they could put some some gate!
Nobody is talking about the lost of space on the apron side. Not at all. The space in and around the DHL Building 2 is really huge, the building itself is really huge and the biggest. That building is more then big enought for check-in, stores, restaurants, etc.
It is even possible to have gates on that Terminal 2 but that has or can be decided later.

User avatar
Airbus330lover
Posts: 889
Joined: 21 Jul 2005, 00:00
Location: Rixensart

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by Airbus330lover »

Established02 wrote:
No matter how much I like the satellite and no matter how much nostalgea it has
Original painting in my office !

User avatar
Conti764
Posts: 2024
Joined: 21 Sep 2007, 23:21

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by Conti764 »

convair wrote:
crew1990 wrote:terminal 2 only be for the checkin facilities, but there will be no gates for the aircraft in the apron side of the terminal isn't it?
Quite a long walk from T2 to pier B then...
Not that long at all... Keep in mind that security and border control will move from their current locations to the Connector.

Besides, their probably will be no Star Alliance flights at pier B anymore, once APW is finished. The entire A-pier will house all Star Alliance flights...

teach
Posts: 740
Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 00:00

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by teach »

Atlantis wrote: The Deloitte building has nothing to do with it. Behind the last lanes is the space already foreseen for extra new lanes
I'm not following. There are currently three lanes in the leisure terminal. The last of those (lane 14 if I'm not mistaken) is already close to the end of the building. No way you can fit more lanes in behind that one. Or are you talking about expansion in the direction of the skyhall?

Put it this way: if I enter the leisure terminal from the street, where will these new lanes be: to my right, my left, or in front of me, way in the back?

User avatar
Atlantis
Posts: 5577
Joined: 12 Apr 2005, 00:00

Re: BRU infrastructure: future

Post by Atlantis »

teach wrote:
Atlantis wrote: The Deloitte building has nothing to do with it. Behind the last lanes is the space already foreseen for extra new lanes
I'm not following. There are currently three lanes in the leisure terminal. The last of those (lane 14 if I'm not mistaken) is already close to the end of the building. No way you can fit more lanes in behind that one. Or are you talking about expansion in the direction of the skyhall?

Put it this way: if I enter the leisure terminal from the street, where will these new lanes be: to my right, my left, or in front of me, way in the back?
It's already foreseen and prepared in a part of that building that you cannot see as a passenger. So it is more in the direction of the Skyhall.

Post Reply