Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future
Moderator: Latest news team
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
What do you mean by terminal 2? The A pear extension?
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
Not in Wavre or Keerbergen I hope!Atlantis wrote:There is a plan for a big parking place yes.
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
Nope. A new terminal like the current one, with check-in facilities etc...crew1990 wrote:What do you mean by terminal 2? The A pear extension?
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
You mean to double the capacity of the airport? But where will they find a place to build another terminal as big as the curent one as the airport is already surrounded of villages and houses?
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
No, no, not to double the capacity of the airport but to bring all check-in facilities of Star under one roof. Terminal 2, T2, will come on the place where you have now the huge and totally empty DHL Building 2. This is the one next to the Diamant.crew1990 wrote:You mean to double the capacity of the airport? But where will they find a place to build another terminal as big as the curent one as the airport is already surrounded of villages and houses?
The current terminal 1, T1, is now really crowded when you walk each day in the departure hall. You hardly can move. T1 will be foreseen for all airlines except Star and Leisure carriers.
The users of the Leisure terminal are very happy with the very light, spacious, wide terminal. In the future it can be extended with two or three more extra check-in lanes. That's already foreseen.
The terminals: T1, T2 and the Leisure terminal will have an L-shape then when you will see it from above.
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
crew1990 wrote:What do you mean by terminal 2? The A pear extension?
T2 and the A Pier West extension are two separated projects but still under one umbrella: Star
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
For you it will be closeconvair wrote:Not in Wavre or Keerbergen I hope!Atlantis wrote:There is a plan for a big parking place yes.
If the plan/idea will be realised then it will be very close.
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
Ok I seeAtlantis wrote:No, no, not to double the capacity of the airport but to bring all check-in facilities of Star under one roof. Terminal 2, T2, will come on the place where you have now the huge and totally empty DHL Building 2. This is the one next to the Diamant.crew1990 wrote:You mean to double the capacity of the airport? But where will they find a place to build another terminal as big as the curent one as the airport is already surrounded of villages and houses?
The current terminal 1, T1, is now really crowded when you walk each day in the departure hall. You hardly can move. T1 will be foreseen for all airlines except Star and Leisure carriers.
The users of the Leisure terminal are very happy with the very light, spacious, wide terminal. In the future it can be extended with two or three more extra check-in lanes. That's already foreseen.
The terminals: T1, T2 and the Leisure terminal will have an L-shape then when you will see it from above.
So terminal 2 only be for the checkin facilities, but there will be no gates for the aircraft in the apron side of the terminal isn't it?
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
Quite a long walk from T2 to pier B then...crew1990 wrote:terminal 2 only be for the checkin facilities, but there will be no gates for the aircraft in the apron side of the terminal isn't it?
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
Then would'n it be a better idea to built a kind of terminal going from the curent hall of departure to Abelag the the check in facilities land side and the gate airside. It would be a better use of the space to me, and less walking distance for the star alliance passenger.
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
Where are they going to put those extra lanes? I don't see how they can extend the building, as the new Deloitte building is in the way.Atlantis wrote: The users of the Leisure terminal are very happy with the very light, spacious, wide terminal. In the future it can be extended with two or three more extra check-in lanes. That's already foreseen.
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
Not really. If I'm not mistaken, the plan is for B pier passengers to go through security and passport control using the Connector entrance and screening platform once the connector is completely finished. In that case, the walk won't be longer for T2 passengers than for T1 passengers, and shorter than the walk for Leisure terminal passengers.convair wrote:Quite a long walk from T2 to pier B then...
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
No, not at all because that's the reason why the security check is now right in the middle and together for pier A and B.convair wrote:Quite a long walk from T2 to pier B then...crew1990 wrote:terminal 2 only be for the checkin facilities, but there will be no gates for the aircraft in the apron side of the terminal isn't it?
Terminal 2 will connect with the new security check area.
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
But why to loose this space apron side while they could put some some gate!
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
The Deloitte building has nothing to do with it. Behind the last lanes is the space already foreseen for extra new lanesteach wrote:Where are they going to put those extra lanes? I don't see how they can extend the building, as the new Deloitte building is in the way.Atlantis wrote: The users of the Leisure terminal are very happy with the very light, spacious, wide terminal. In the future it can be extended with two or three more extra check-in lanes. That's already foreseen.
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
Nobody is talking about the lost of space on the apron side. Not at all. The space in and around the DHL Building 2 is really huge, the building itself is really huge and the biggest. That building is more then big enought for check-in, stores, restaurants, etc.crew1990 wrote:But why to loose this space apron side while they could put some some gate!
It is even possible to have gates on that Terminal 2 but that has or can be decided later.
- Airbus330lover
- Posts: 889
- Joined: 21 Jul 2005, 00:00
- Location: Rixensart
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
Original painting in my office !Established02 wrote:No matter how much I like the satellite and no matter how much nostalgea it has
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
Not that long at all... Keep in mind that security and border control will move from their current locations to the Connector.convair wrote:Quite a long walk from T2 to pier B then...crew1990 wrote:terminal 2 only be for the checkin facilities, but there will be no gates for the aircraft in the apron side of the terminal isn't it?
Besides, their probably will be no Star Alliance flights at pier B anymore, once APW is finished. The entire A-pier will house all Star Alliance flights...
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
I'm not following. There are currently three lanes in the leisure terminal. The last of those (lane 14 if I'm not mistaken) is already close to the end of the building. No way you can fit more lanes in behind that one. Or are you talking about expansion in the direction of the skyhall?Atlantis wrote: The Deloitte building has nothing to do with it. Behind the last lanes is the space already foreseen for extra new lanes
Put it this way: if I enter the leisure terminal from the street, where will these new lanes be: to my right, my left, or in front of me, way in the back?
Re: BRU infrastructure: future
It's already foreseen and prepared in a part of that building that you cannot see as a passenger. So it is more in the direction of the Skyhall.teach wrote:I'm not following. There are currently three lanes in the leisure terminal. The last of those (lane 14 if I'm not mistaken) is already close to the end of the building. No way you can fit more lanes in behind that one. Or are you talking about expansion in the direction of the skyhall?Atlantis wrote: The Deloitte building has nothing to do with it. Behind the last lanes is the space already foreseen for extra new lanes
Put it this way: if I enter the leisure terminal from the street, where will these new lanes be: to my right, my left, or in front of me, way in the back?