I guess it is not easy for SN to start up a new long haul destination. Just look how long it took them to expand into Africa and how long it takes them to start up the long mentioned USA flight. And the entire Korongo case just shows how difficult it is to start something at the DRC. ZC's competitors are already doing everything in their power to prevent or at least stall ZC from beginning, let alone they would just allow SN to facilitate transferring through FBM.Duke wrote: I don't understand this negative reaction. I have been curious myself why Brussels Airlines hasn't considered a direct (or nonstop) flight to Lubumbashi. It would be quite logical to offer a direct flight, connecting to Korongo's network, as not every passenger flying to the DRC has Kinshasa as final destination.
Duke
In theory it is perfectly possible to sustain FBM as operational and FIH as transfer hub in Congo. Take a BAe146 as example. They could make it fly FBM-KGA-FIH not only creating a link between the two latter, but also between FBM and KGA. This schedule can be used for other domestic Congolese destinations as well, if they will materialize in the future.
Only when ZC has developed into a bigger scale carrier with multiple destinations within Congo and their neighbouring countries, it might be worth the risk to open up a second destination in the same country. For the time being SN will do perfectly fine by funneling pax through FIH into secondary destinations. Let's not forget they still have 'only' one flight a day carrying 268 pax at a maximum all arriving at FIH at the same time.
But of course, that's just my armchair CEO analysis of the situation