Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk?
Moderator: Latest news team
-
NCB
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
Last edited by NCB on 20 Dec 2010, 19:55, edited 1 time in total.
-
jan_olieslagers
- Posts: 3082
- Joined: 24 Jun 2006, 08:34
- Location: Vl.Brabant
- Contact:
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
Naw, it is being held for a trebled security check, seeing the risk increase from our inside information suddenly exposed to the public at large. Actually, I heard a rumour of the deicing fluid being microscopically verified. Takes some doing at 1cc per shot.
-
NCB
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
Security have done checks for less than this. A hunch or a forgotten bag...
Nah, probably lack of equipment.
Nah, probably lack of equipment.
- cathay belgium
- Posts: 2379
- Joined: 18 Aug 2008, 00:17
- Location: Lommel-Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
Hi,
that MOSSAD is active at BRU and our own police may not interfere their actions.
Yeah, P-magazine has more to see/read than beautiful women..
Oh yes, that there are better ways to treat a flight , blackmailing working Airport Personnel...,
weapons at Steenokkerzeel, as I said before their were better ways to act as terrorism than a reg..
And indeed, at AMS the reg is standard on their site, but hey as NCB video/youtube told us, AMS
is the perfect hot spot for terrorists..
Why would we bother at BRU ? Less flights ,less pax, less international flights haha
So NCB, I must admit I may asking you why you are still at luchtzak.be , one of my favourite sites ! ,
as there is no common sense and seeking internet status...
Maybe you're right and I know a member who just fit in your opinions ...
useless debates : this topic, as AMS is giving the regs standard ??
outer limits: flying catering around AFI to support a load of A319's
NCB, who are we fighting to ? Just I wanted to know because I'm shopping tommorow at BRU Nieuwstraat,
at I wanted to look out for some..
My flight with knife was Easyjet BRU-SXF 23 June 2010 reg G-EZAA ETD 08h55 EZY 4702.
can't, if I guess what X-plane landed last month secretly after a few months in space..
No I don't have or share secret info on this forum but I can guess...
and besides.. there are NO nuclear weapons at Kleine Brogel AFB
now also SN and homeland safety departments ..
Luchtzak.be were becoming a truely famous respected site I guess despites some other active members
have another viewpoint of us ...
If you're working for SN, there is probably also a article of making your company looking
in a bad light on public areas, I know I have one ...
Oh yes, I was right I had a big laugh after all.... THX.. guys..
Besides , already a reg for flight BRU-CTA on SN 20/2/2011, tolepanebas if you're my pilot
can I get a jumpseat ? So the pax can be awared that there are at least 2 men in the cockpit living in the real world ...
CX-B
This must be El Al I guess, since P-magazine reported last summer the very secret thingregi wrote:There is 1 specific Asian airline that always has top priority.
that MOSSAD is active at BRU and our own police may not interfere their actions.
Yeah, P-magazine has more to see/read than beautiful women..
Attention NCB, this is the second time !!, next third..NCB wrote:Mr. Luchtzak, please cancel my membership as soon as possible.
What will learn us by this fact..NCB wrote:Spontaneously providing reg info is also different from answering a request for a reg.
Who knows, maybe this bxleu guy was smuggling drugs and wanted someone to tell him in advance which aircraft he should deposit it on. The same could be done with a bomb.
Oh yes, that there are better ways to treat a flight , blackmailing working Airport Personnel...,
weapons at Steenokkerzeel, as I said before their were better ways to act as terrorism than a reg..
And indeed, at AMS the reg is standard on their site, but hey as NCB video/youtube told us, AMS
is the perfect hot spot for terrorists..
Why would we bother at BRU ? Less flights ,less pax, less international flights haha
NCB wrote:But I think that this forum is special (like airliners.net), in the sense that there is no common sense.
Just useless debates where there is nothing to debate about to start with, only people exploring the outer limits of reality and seeking internet status by publishing confidential company information.
So NCB, I must admit I may asking you why you are still at luchtzak.be , one of my favourite sites ! ,
as there is no common sense and seeking internet status...
Maybe you're right and I know a member who just fit in your opinions ...
useless debates : this topic, as AMS is giving the regs standard ??
outer limits: flying catering around AFI to support a load of A319's
and some secret air-marshall behind .. who knows,now we're on war..NCB wrote:But don't worry, Tolipanebas always has a captain sitting next to him.
NCB, who are we fighting to ? Just I wanted to know because I'm shopping tommorow at BRU Nieuwstraat,
at I wanted to look out for some..
tangolima wrote:@ Cathay Pacific What was your registration by the way. ?
My flight with knife was Easyjet BRU-SXF 23 June 2010 reg G-EZAA ETD 08h55 EZY 4702.
Sorry I must tell you, is not because they (USA) didn't used it active in public already that theyNCB wrote:Unfortunately, satellites can't shoot yet and they can't cover every corner either
can't, if I guess what X-plane landed last month secretly after a few months in space..
No I don't have or share secret info on this forum but I can guess...
and besides.. there are NO nuclear weapons at Kleine Brogel AFB
Same remark, we all can guess but we don't know or were you besides working for SN also for CIA..NCB wrote:If you thought that AF1 only has chaffs, flares and jamming to protect itself, you are very naive.
Ohhhh yes, now besides the real journalists take over some info from luchtzak ..NCB wrote:Why is this flight delayed by this much time when other flights are operating with 2 or 3 hours delay?
Is it an operational or security delay?
now also SN and homeland safety departments ..
Luchtzak.be were becoming a truely famous respected site I guess despites some other active members
have another viewpoint of us ...
NCB wrote:Nah, probably lack of equipment.
If you're working for SN, there is probably also a article of making your company looking
in a bad light on public areas, I know I have one ...
Oh yes, I was right I had a big laugh after all.... THX.. guys..
Besides , already a reg for flight BRU-CTA on SN 20/2/2011, tolepanebas if you're my pilot
can I get a jumpseat ? So the pax can be awared that there are at least 2 men in the cockpit living in the real world ...
CX-B
Last edited by cathay belgium on 20 Dec 2010, 21:02, edited 1 time in total.
New types flown 2024 : DO228, A338 , PC6
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
New actual departure time was 20:00 (8 hrs late). Registration OO-VES. This is the final answer to the initial question.OO-JFP wrote:It"s still on the ground. New departure time 19.40 according to the Brussels airport website.
André
ex Sabena #26567
ex Sabena #26567
- cathay belgium
- Posts: 2379
- Joined: 18 Aug 2008, 00:17
- Location: Lommel-Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
sn26567 wrote:Registration OO-VES.
Have a nice and safe flight bxleu !!
Hope you can return safe with the deicing-and snow problems..
Enjoy a port ! and thx for a remarkable topic !
CX-B
New types flown 2024 : DO228, A338 , PC6
- tolipanebas
- Posts: 2442
- Joined: 12 May 2004, 00:00
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
yep, once a year, during the annual line check, that is.NCB wrote:Don't worry, Tolipanebas always has a captain sitting next to him.
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
OO-VES now coming back with a very strange callsign: "OPOBRU1". Is this a conspiracy?
Arrival at BRU scheduled 01:19.
Arrival at BRU scheduled 01:19.
André
ex Sabena #26567
ex Sabena #26567
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
[
Euhm, the one coming from the airport where they embarked the drugs, or is this too simple?NCB wrote:Spontaneously providing reg info is also different from answering a request for a reg.
Who knows, maybe this bxleu guy was smuggling drugs and wanted someone to tell him in advance which aircraft he should deposit it on...
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
Dear NCB, I assume that your word "perhaps" means that you have not performed military duty in a real combat unit, where enlisted privates were sent in the field with little training, causing terrible accidents.NCB wrote:Perhaps the lack of military service is what makes the youth of today fall short on these matters?.
I have performed my military duty in such a unit. ( got extra seperate training in Belgium and abroad, and am still attached to the military ) I have seen enough. I would not like my son ( who is a unresponsable young adult ) to become victim of frustrated, alcoholic professional soldiers. Look at Russia.
In my unit - during military service alone - we had multiple shooting accidents. We had multiple road accidents with 15 wounded in 1 accident of who some never returned to duty. We had in our bataljon several succeeded suicides due to mistreatment by professional soldiers. The unsuccesful ones were sent to prison and/or locked up in a sealed psychiatric wing of Neder Over Heembeek.
Most of conscripts had a leazy time. ( the same ones that you wrongly think who would improve their behaviour by military service ) But for some it was hell.
Last example: during the first Gulf War Belgium had sent a ship to the Gulf. The operation took 1 life: a marine conscript disappeared in the Suez Canal, suicide. Great education...
I must admit that at some times I have the same idea: " In my days it would have been different !"
But realisticly speaking, those days are gone, and I hope for all those young people that they will not come back.
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
I cannot disclose that specific Asian airlinecathay belgium wrote:Hi,
This must be El Al I guess, since P-magazine reported last summer the very secret thingregi wrote:There is 1 specific Asian airline that always has top priority.
that MOSSAD is active at BRU and our own police may not interfere their actions.
Yeah, P-magazine has more to see/read than beautiful women..![]()
CX-B
And please, dear Cathay, don't give the impression that we see P Magazine as a reliable source.
Interference against secret services e.g. mossad : there is a difference in interfering their on going affairs or reacting on illegal activities. Example where I was involved: in a restricted area we see a male non-native person coming out of a car with normal nr. plates. As he steps out of the car, we see he carries a hand weapon under his jacket. We summon him to surrender. He reacts that he is embassy blablabla. But he has to hit the deck in the dirt, and he did because he immediately saw we were not police but military and would react differently. ( no, at those moments you don't call in a ministry to ask what you must do ) The person did not have a diplomatic passport, carried a special hand weapon ( loaded, checked by my mate) and said again to contact his embassy ( without saying which one
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
No matter how much I appreciate P-Magazine for their articles, this story was a bullshitstory. There is no Mossad active at the airport, or at least not in the service that was mentioned in the article of P-Magazine.cathay belgium wrote:Hi,
This must be El Al I guess, since P-magazine reported last summer the very secret thingregi wrote:There is 1 specific Asian airline that always has top priority.
that MOSSAD is active at BRU and our own police may not interfere their actions.
Yeah, P-magazine has more to see/read than beautiful women..![]()
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
No activity of the secret service of Israel at Zaventem? And their own interrogation squad before boarding, is that the boy scouts of Zaventem?Conti764 wrote:No matter how much I appreciate P-Magazine for their articles, this story was a bullshitstory. There is no Mossad active at the airport, or at least not in the service that was mentioned in the article of P-Magazine.cathay belgium wrote:Hi,
This must be El Al I guess, since P-magazine reported last summer the very secret thingregi wrote:There is 1 specific Asian airline that always has top priority.
that MOSSAD is active at BRU and our own police may not interfere their actions.
Yeah, P-magazine has more to see/read than beautiful women..![]()
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
I was under the impression that in Israel they teach interrogation techniques in elementary school. Doesn't Mossad have better things to do than interrogate passengers?regi wrote: No activity of the secret service of Israel at Zaventem? And their own interrogation squad before boarding, is that the boy scouts of Zaventem?
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
At least it's no Mossad.regi wrote: No activity of the secret service of Israel at Zaventem? And their own interrogation squad before boarding, is that the boy scouts of Zaventem?
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
Right, OK, I admit. I presume that the training of the airport security personnel falls under the Shin Bet.Conti764 wrote:At least it's no Mossad.regi wrote: No activity of the secret service of Israel at Zaventem? And their own interrogation squad before boarding, is that the boy scouts of Zaventem?
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
FYI NCB decided to leave this website, I had to cancel his account upon his request.
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
This time it wasn't my fault.luchtzak wrote:FYI NCB decided to leave this website, I had to cancel his account upon his request.
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
Actually it was a very tiring and not that pleasant experience!cathay belgium wrote:sn26567 wrote:Registration OO-VES.![]()
Have a nice and safe flight bxleu !!
Hope you can return safe with the deicing-and snow problems..
Enjoy a port ! and thx for a remarkable topic !
CX-B
Indeed, we first left the gate at 18:39 after being delayed a few times (appartently OO-VES was stuck in LHR) and after a technical problem (don't ask me what...). On the way to the runway a passenger felt some kind of liquid dropping on him (not joking, I was seating nearby and saw it!) and we had to turn around for inspection, safety first! Two technicians got in and said all was ok, even though they didn't seem to know what was that...
We eventually took off at 20:00! But that was not all: when approaching OPO airport the pilot decided to go around because there was an aircraft on the runway. A few more minutes in the air...
Passengers on B.light got free drinks and some sweet stuff to compensate for all the trouble, even though we got food vouchers while at BRU.
The flight back was much better, this time on TAP executive!
Re: Registration SN3811 BRU-OPO 20 Dec: Is disclosure a risk
liquid: I have seen passengers been really showered during take off from Saigon on a AF old B747 -300 I think. It was condensation that had gathered at some point and when the bird went up, all the water came down through the ventilation hole or the breathing mask cover. Dreadful experience for those passengers.
Yes, it was the same flight with the frantic bat criscrossing the cabin for 90 minutes. AF, what a laugh...
Yes, it was the same flight with the frantic bat criscrossing the cabin for 90 minutes. AF, what a laugh...