Hi,
NCB wrote:A captain should not let his company dictate his actions. He must take financial and commercial factors into consideration but the safe completion of a flight, from boarding to de-boarding, and the safety and security of both the aircraft and its occupants should be his priority at all times.
Welcome in the REAL WORLD NCB,
Pax and bird were in LGG -SAFE,company spend less money in LGG than in CDG
Pilot wants to keep his job and do DID his job !
What's the problem
NCB wrote:Additionally, the captain should not have left the aircraft and even less, the open cockpit unattended. This is a legal and moral responsibility. For instance, if the aircraft would have caught fire, he would have needed to assist the evacuation and coordinate with rescue personnel.
Pilot was hijact and treated by pax,firemen on stand by..
NCB wrote:-Closing the toilet off is a sign that shows that the cabin crew was expecting a long lasting crisis and a clear sign of arrogance, provocation on their part.
Make the crisis a little bit shorter..
NCB wrote:-They have failed to provide assistance to the crew, to maintain the security of the aircraft and its occupants. If the captain requests the assistance, the police must provide such assistance. The arrogance of the crew probably made the police officers get on the passenger's side. The territorial chit-chat no longer applies from the moment that the captain grants security personnel access to the aircraft.
Arrogance, think the police did know they were on foreign grounds, making this an international accident,
maybe the police weren't that much informed and as long there were no injuries they want to keep
away of the commitee P and Belgian law/politics.. and they also wanted to keep their jobs
NCB wrote:
The passengers have given the crew the same disrespect that they were given in the first place. Nowadays, it's the only way of getting your due justice back. Getting justice through the justice system takes time and money.
Did I REALLY READ THIS
NO COMMENT
NCB wrote:Sean, I think that your friends have had a bad day. Nevertheless, they have created the tension that escalated into this incident and only them are to blame for this. The other flights ended up fine probably because the crew was less arrogant and more helpful.
I think the pax were a bunch of real idiots,sitting and stealing the plane ..
Maybe you can't choose sides when we don't have the whole story, but reading they were there for more than 4
h in a dark plane without WC,full of anger and behaving badly,treating the crew ..
advantage crew..
Did pax go off the plane or did ALL the pax stayed in there?
NCB wrote:
No matter how little they pay, they are your customer and deserve to be treated as such.
Offcourse ,but in the real...
You get what you pay for..
NCB wrote:Finally, it must be admitted that Ryanair cabin crew are often arrogant. I'm sure that they are all great people but it's the company's way of working that makes them so arrogant when on duty. Ultimately, it's their own choice to accept such jobs and the passenger must not be expected to understand.
DID you ever flown FR ?
I did, and I'm complety not okay with your opinion..
They were often better than ..
Crew were always very friendly to me !
It's their own choice ? I talked a girl/Flight Attendant from BGY working for FR, she earned good money,
3x the amount she had with MALEV, she left her family from Hungary and lived now in Bergamo,
flying around europe to get a better life in Italy than in her home country.
Okay maybe working conditions are better at SN,AF,KL,LH,BA,.. but this is our REAL world.
She was happy ,is happy with FR and not all can work with the better companies..
So if it was her own choice .. think again.. Y/N
It's the customer own choice to pay a penny ,have a cheap flight with friendly crew but if something happens.
don't blame the crew,FR but be less Scottish ( no offend

, I love whiskey

- ok/ 'gierig in Dutch') and pay a penny more..
I fly FR ( for fun ) with this risk in mind..
but hey this is just IMHO..
CX-B