The best commuter aircraft

A forum to discuss all aviation items (not for latest aviation news and military aviation news)

Moderator: Latest news team

Best commuter aircraft

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
sab319
Posts: 2142
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 00:00
Location: Mortsel, antwerp, Flanders, Belgium, Europe, Earth, Milky way
Contact:

The best commuter aircraft

Post by sab319 »

Wich one is your favourite commuter aircraft? I think the Dornier 328 especially in Welcome air colors, nice design in happy colors!

vliegtuigfreak
Posts: 888
Joined: 20 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Zele, Belgium
Contact:

Post by vliegtuigfreak »

I love the Fokker 50! Even i have never bin on that plane. But i've seen them several times at EBAW and the are very beautiful!

Greetingzz
Sonny :wink:

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Re: The best commuter aircraft

Post by SN30952 »

sab319 wrote:Wich one is your favourite commuter aircraft? I think the Dornier 328 especially in Welcome air colors, nice design in happy colors!
And the Saab 340 A?
[img]http://www.saabaircraftleasing.com/resi ... &width=350[/img]

User avatar
sab319
Posts: 2142
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 00:00
Location: Mortsel, antwerp, Flanders, Belgium, Europe, Earth, Milky way
Contact:

Post by sab319 »

I forgot to put the SAAB 340 and 2000 in the list, sorry!!!!

User avatar
sn26567
Posts: 41171
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: Rosières/Rozieren, Belgium
Contact:

Post by sn26567 »

sab319 wrote:I forgot to put the SAAB 340 and 2000 in the list, sorry!!!!
You still can edit your first post to include them.
André
ex Sabena #26567

Snoopy
Posts: 19
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Snoopy »

Good idea .....

I think that the Saab 2000 is the best commuter .... Nice cockpit , fast and comfortable for a turboprop

User avatar
Comet
Posts: 6484
Joined: 05 Jul 2003, 00:00
Location: Scarborough, North Yorkshire, England
Contact:

Post by Comet »

The Fokker props get my vote, mainly because they're the only ones in the list I've been on, but I have found them quite comfortable, easy for viewing and the VLM ones are very comfortable with leather seats and 32" pitch.

I also like the ATR types, but that's more for their photogenic qualities, same for the Dorniers. The Saab 2000 is also a favourite video subject of mine, for its awesome take off performance (superb rate of climb for a prop).
Sabena and Sobelair - gone but never forgotten.
Louise

User avatar
A318
Posts: 1721
Joined: 13 Aug 2003, 00:00
Location: Between here and there
Contact:

Post by A318 »

Fokker, since it is dutch, reliable and efficient!

Greetz,

Erwin
A Whole Different Animal

User avatar
Jumbolino
Posts: 364
Joined: 16 Oct 2002, 00:00
Location: Meerbusch (DUS)
Contact:

Post by Jumbolino »

Of, course from the choice of the poll my heart says it´s the ATR, but my brain says it´s the CRJ because - it´s faster, but there are still a few places in this world where the ATR is a lot better (you can land it nearly everywhere, ....)

Jumbolino.

User avatar
Avro
Posts: 8856
Joined: 28 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Avro »

I voted for the Dornier 328 JET, but only for the beauty of it.
I've never flown any of those planes, that's why I cannot really judge and tell which one is the best.

Chris

User avatar
Jumbolino
Posts: 364
Joined: 16 Oct 2002, 00:00
Location: Meerbusch (DUS)
Contact:

Post by Jumbolino »

@Avro
seems that I was lucky, I have flown all of them except the Fokker mentioned (but I had flights with Fokker 70 and Fokker 100, but this isn´t a real commuter aircraft, but very beautiful planes, a shame that Fokker is gone away ....)

Jumbolino.

User avatar
luchtzak
Posts: 11841
Joined: 18 Sep 2002, 00:00
Location: Hofstade, Zemst - Belgium
Contact:

Post by luchtzak »

I am sorry but I can't understand why 2 people allready voted for ATR 42/72 !!

All my planes that I have flown with that ugly non-aircraft looking piece of scrap was my worst experience!!

I remember that after 'engines off' the passengers where not allowed to stand up before the tail-prop (metal object to stick in the tail of the plane to prevent it tilting over) was installed, small seat-pitch, in your rear galley you had to move some passenger-bags before you could have access in some of the trolleys and if you where lucky you could welcome 150 kgs of sandbags in the back of the plane!!

User avatar
Jumbolino
Posts: 364
Joined: 16 Oct 2002, 00:00
Location: Meerbusch (DUS)
Contact:

Post by Jumbolino »

Hi Bart,
One of the non-understandable people was me ;-)
Well, I had approx 80 flights with an ATR-42/72 of FU and EW and for such a small person like me it's very comfortable (except the experience the EU Commisioner of agriculture had the seat nearby me, that was thuna-experience but not the fault of the ATR, but maybe because of his over-weight)
and in comparison to an Embraer or Saab 2000 the overhead bin's for your hand luggage are quite comfortable (you can place there a normal sized trolley without any difficulties not so in an Embraer and of course the overheads of an CRJ are even smaller), so what you have against an ATR ? it's a little bit slow - ok - but even comfortable ;-)

Jumbolino.

User avatar
AN124
Posts: 1500
Joined: 16 Dec 2003, 00:00
Location: Maastricht (The Netherlands)

Post by AN124 »

My vote will also go the the ERJ series of Embrear.
Really good looking aircraft and their are really comfortable to fly.
I flew sometimes in the EMB145 of KLM Exel and the plane is really stable in the air and you got enough space to store your luggage and other stuff. And almost no noise in the cabin.

I agree with Bart on the ATR42/72. I had several flights on these machines and I just don't like flying with them. The cabin is noisy and everything around you is shaking due to the vibrations of the props.

Best Regards,
Yvo

User avatar
luchtzak
Posts: 11841
Joined: 18 Sep 2002, 00:00
Location: Hofstade, Zemst - Belgium
Contact:

Post by luchtzak »

I will re-position myself in the ATR 42/72-issue ;-) The ATR 42/72 is no good for people working on there (e.g. flight attendants), as a passenger I cannot tell ;-)

terenia
Posts: 67
Joined: 27 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Warsaw, Poland - Rixensart, Belgium
Contact:

Post by terenia »

luchtzak wrote: if you where lucky you could welcome 150 kgs of sandbags in the back of the plane!!
Why would you put sandbags in the plane :?: :?:

User avatar
luchtzak
Posts: 11841
Joined: 18 Sep 2002, 00:00
Location: Hofstade, Zemst - Belgium
Contact:

Post by luchtzak »

terenia wrote:Why would you put sandbags in the plane :?: :?:
To have a nice balanced aircraft.

User avatar
Avro
Posts: 8856
Joined: 28 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Avro »

Well, if you have to put sand bags in the plane to balance it, then you have a problem with the design (In my opinion).
You Loose Cargo space, and burn more fuel just to be able to balance the plane correctly. Seems to be a strange solution :roll: I think it would have been better to solve the problem when building the plane.

Ciao
Chris
8)

vliegtuigfreak
Posts: 888
Joined: 20 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Zele, Belgium
Contact:

Post by vliegtuigfreak »

ATR's fault!!
Is ATR french? And whats the fully name of ATR?

Greetingzz
Sonny :wink:

User avatar
A318
Posts: 1721
Joined: 13 Aug 2003, 00:00
Location: Between here and there
Contact:

Post by A318 »

vliegtuigfreak wrote:ATR's fault!!
Is ATR french? And whats the fully name of ATR?

Greetingzz
Sonny :wink:
ATR planes are made by France-based Avions
de Transport Regional.

Now you know why it flies so awfull ;)

Greetz,

Erwin
A Whole Different Animal

Post Reply