APB announces 767 Blended Winglets

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

Post Reply
User avatar
bits44
Posts: 1889
Joined: 03 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: Vancouver CYVR

APB announces 767 Blended Winglets

Post by bits44 »

Aviation Partners Boeing announces release of blended winglets for the 767-300ER


http://www.tickertech.com/cgi/?a=news&t ... ____SFM038
There are no strangers in the world, just friends we have yet to meet.

smokejumper
Posts: 1033
Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:00
Location: Northern Virginia USA

Post by smokejumper »

With these winglets, the 767-300ER appears to have a new lease on life. It will not be as efficient as the A350 or B787, but it will be a good improvement on the current non-winglet equipped plane. Icelandic AL announced their intent to install them (when available) when they purchased several 767-300's several years ago.

I wonder whether and how much these winglets (with testing and certification) would improve the performance of the 767-200, including the KC-767 offered to the US Air Force tanker competition.

User avatar
cageyjames
Posts: 514
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 00:00
Location: On Lease to PHL

Post by cageyjames »

US could probably use them on their 767-200ERs if they ever offered them. Probably not going to happen as very few airlines are flying those anymore. Better we just transition to the A330 sooner rather than later (but we'll find out more about that at the end of the month).
US Airways - Fly with US

smokejumper
Posts: 1033
Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:00
Location: Northern Virginia USA

Post by smokejumper »

What about the KC-767 and the 767-Freighter (a 767-300 derivitive)? In the case of the KC-767 (a -200LR Freighter derivitive), an increase in range, payload and lower fuel consumption would mmake it more competitive?

Anyone have an opinion?

User avatar
OO-TUC
Posts: 57
Joined: 21 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: Holland

Post by OO-TUC »

IMO it would be perfect for the B767 fleet of dutch charter\scheduled carrier Martinair (MP). Although their birds are getting quite old ('89-93 years of build), it seems they cant replace them due to internal arguing (read: shareholders KLM\Maersk vs Management MP) and the financial side.

These winglets would extend the life of the birds, till MP can get a B787 replacement of them.

There are rumours too that the interior of the MP B767's will be updated next year.. can someone confirm this?

chunk
Posts: 764
Joined: 07 May 2004, 00:00
Location: Scotland usually

Post by chunk »

Can someone please explain something to a non-tekky like myself? How is it they only design winglets for 767's now? I mean....many widebodies have had them since they were built so why only now for these planes? I guess the same applies to teh 777...

User avatar
CX
Posts: 788
Joined: 30 Jul 2005, 00:00

Post by CX »

Are they only doing it for the -300ER?
Qantas still has heaps of them, and before their 100 or so 787 arrives, they'll surely be one to get those winglets... but does winglets really improve performance so significantly that even extends range and payload etc?

User avatar
bits44
Posts: 1889
Joined: 03 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: Vancouver CYVR

Post by bits44 »

Don't forget APB has only been doing Boeing jets since 1999, as well as other aircraft.

The largest market and leading candidate was the 737 and by all accounts from the airline customers they achieved spectacular savings and improved flight characteristics.

The 757 and 767 were up in the air so I would expect they did the design work earlier on and when the interest in those models increased they went ahead with producing them.

In answer to Chunks comments, I understand some models such as the 777 have supercritical wings and are not candidates for winglets, as for the 787 the same applies.

The military version of the 767 will have winglets as I understand.

All you want to know about winglets to found here:


http://www.aviationpartnersboeing.com/about/index.html
There are no strangers in the world, just friends we have yet to meet.

Dutchyboi
Posts: 65
Joined: 21 Mar 2005, 00:00
Location: Melbourne(YMML) , Aust and Maastricht (EHBK) , NL

Post by Dutchyboi »

CX wrote:Are they only doing it for the -300ER?
Qantas still has heaps of them, and before their 100 or so 787 arrives, they'll surely be one to get those winglets... but does winglets really improve performance so significantly that even extends range and payload etc?
Most likely not, first they will have to withdraw them from service to have them installed which is $$ secondly the money it will cost to have them sitting in maintenance and not in the air. The further the distance the a/c flys with winglets the more effective and continous flying over acertain time frame to get their money back and turn it into a profit. With this QF won't have the 767 kicking on for too much longer due to the 787. Most of the sectors the 767 does nowdays are domestic with the longest being around 3 1/2 to 4 hours flying time. Most of the Asian sectors the 767 used to fly on have been taken over by the a333. So doubt this will occur.

User avatar
fokker_f27
Posts: 1812
Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 00:00
Location: Weerde, Zemst - Belgium

Post by fokker_f27 »

I think this has potential. The 787 doesn't necessary mean the end for the 767, but to be competitive adding wingets to the 767 seems like a good descision to me.
The most sexy girl in the sky: The Sud-Est Caravelle 12.

User avatar
bits44
Posts: 1889
Joined: 03 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: Vancouver CYVR

Post by bits44 »

AA is adding winglets to its 767ER fleet.

If you want to see savings on fuel read this article.

http://www.pr-inside.com/american-airli ... 104536.htm
There are no strangers in the world, just friends we have yet to meet.

Post Reply