Fujifilm Finepix S9500?

Share pictures, log-reports, special aircraft, nice events, hints and tips from the Belgian airports

Moderator: Plane spotting team

Post Reply

What do you prefere?

Poll ended at 18 May 2006, 17:18

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
Skyfighter
Posts: 257
Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: Antwerp (Ekeren)

Fujifilm Finepix S9500?

Post by Skyfighter »

Hi all,

I was wondering...
I want to buy a camera for spotting.But i don't know that much about good cam's.So now is my question: what do you think about the Fujifilm Finepix S9500?

Grts

(an examp: http://www.actionshop.be/product.asp?de ... 5&pID=1065)

User avatar
bits44
Posts: 1889
Joined: 03 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: Vancouver CYVR

Post by bits44 »

An excellent review of an astoundingly good camera, and one of the best lens's in the business. I have a good friend who is a Pro photographer and he absolutely loves it.

http://www.letsgodigital.org/html/revie ... 0_EN1.html
There are no strangers in the world, just friends we have yet to meet.

User avatar
Skyfighter
Posts: 257
Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: Antwerp (Ekeren)

thx

Post by Skyfighter »

THX for the reply,nice site to!!!

User avatar
Tommypilot
Posts: 374
Joined: 22 Mar 2003, 00:00
Location: Near Brussels
Contact:

Post by Tommypilot »

Nothing beats Canon imho.
sn690 wrote:Really the best one I've ever had :wink:
I think its also the first one you have ever had no? :wink:
Tommy
The word "impossible" is not in my dictionary! - Napoleon Bonaparte

User avatar
speedbird1
Posts: 1194
Joined: 08 Mar 2004, 00:00

Post by speedbird1 »

Well I have just started taking pictures. I bought a Canon 350D, very good camera. I have read reviews that people say it feels small, but I rate it. The software for it is very good, also you get vouchers for money off on Canon products as well as a good warantee.
If you need anymore info just PM me mate.

One of my first pics with it!

http://www.planepictures.net/netshow.php?id=438238

Cheers,

Emirates

User avatar
Skyfighter
Posts: 257
Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: Antwerp (Ekeren)

Post by Skyfighter »

Tommypilot wrote:Nothing beats Canon imho.
sn690 wrote:Really the best one I've ever had :wink:
I think its also the first one you have ever had no? :wink:
:P lol

Thanks everyone!!!!

User avatar
SilverJET
Posts: 371
Joined: 25 Sep 2003, 00:00
Location: Maasmechelen, Limburg (B)

Post by SilverJET »

All depends on the money you like to spend and how often you go spotting.

If money is no problem and if you like to go spotting every weekend or so. Then I would recommend you the Canon 350D or Nikon D50.

When you will spot a few times a year. And like to use your camera for other occasions. Maybe a compact camera with a great zoom and image stabilizer will fit your needs. In this case the Fuji S9500, Canon powershot S3 IS or Panasonic Lumix FZ7 will suit your preferences.
Best Regards Raymond

User avatar
Bottie
Posts: 2076
Joined: 18 Jan 2004, 00:00
Location: 2nm from EBUL
Contact:

Post by Bottie »

I've had a Canon EOS 300D, very good cam, but I missed some features on it (like Servo AF when shooting in RAW), then I got a 10D that had this feature. After a while I got a 20D, which I still use, but I got a 350D and since a couple of days a 30D ... So you can say I stick with Canon because I'm satisfied with them. Small remark about the 350D, I also find it rather small, certainly when you put a big zoomlens on it (like Sigma 50-500), but maybe with a batterygrip on it that point improves, but now the 350D is used with a Canon 28-135 IS lens.

Before using the DSLR's, I've had a Minolta Dimage Z1, which was used as a football after a few days, the delay between pushing the button and the cam making the picture was too big, and a (D)SLR doesn't have this problem ;)

omag
Posts: 210
Joined: 10 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: Ruiselede

Post by omag »

I own a Panasonic Lumix FZ5 (with at 12x optical zoom and leica lense) and went spotting at EBBR a while ago... I was pretty pleased with the results, keeping in mind that this a bridge-camera and no dSLR. There is however a noise-level that you won't get with the Canon-Nikon-Olympus SLR's, but that's easily corrected in photoshop.

I think this is a great learning-camera with lots of possibilities, but without the cost of the big cams.

Cheers,

Omag

User avatar
SilverJET
Posts: 371
Joined: 25 Sep 2003, 00:00
Location: Maasmechelen, Limburg (B)

Post by SilverJET »

omag wrote:I own a Panasonic Lumix FZ5 (with at 12x optical zoom and leica lense) and went spotting at EBBR a while ago... I was pretty pleased with the results, keeping in mind that this a bridge-camera and no dSLR. There is however a noise-level that you won't get with the Canon-Nikon-Olympus SLR's, but that's easily corrected in photoshop.

I think this is a great learning-camera with lots of possibilities, but without the cost of the big cams.

Cheers,

Omag
I've heard positive things about the Lumix brand. The only negative one is the amount of noise it has. Hope Panasonic can improve that in the future!

Can you post some pictures taken with your camera? And which noise reducer do you use?
Best Regards Raymond

User avatar
Skyfighter
Posts: 257
Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: Antwerp (Ekeren)

reply

Post by Skyfighter »

:D Hi all

thx for all the info

I went to 2 camera shop's where I could compare the both cam's.
I must say the S9500 is MUCH better than the most Nikon series.I heared a lot of EOS but when I saw the Fujifilm I was convinced.

You pay less for the S9500 compared with his featurs than a Nikon serie.
The S9500 has many more features and a greater zoom.You can use 2 memory sticks at the same time,etc....

Really I didn't made a mistake for buying the S9500

BUT IT IS STILL MY OPINION :D :P

greets and thanks all

maaspotter
Posts: 79
Joined: 18 Oct 2004, 00:00

Post by maaspotter »

Really I didn't made a mistake for buying the S9500

Hi Skyfighter,

If you go out there and shoot some pictures, can you send me some oriniginal files or something? I'm also thinking about buying a new camera, because I used my old camera (Fuji S304) way to much..

the Fuji S9500 could be a good candidate for replacing my S304 :)

greetz,
rob (robbominaar@hotmail.com)

trikkke
Posts: 5
Joined: 25 Feb 2005, 00:00

Post by trikkke »

hello skyfighter,

i own a fuji finepix s9500.

it is an excellent allround camera for everyday use.
i especially like the lens, which has a great range (28-300)
the lens is fixed, so you cannot use a second lens, but this is also an advantage, because no dirt can enter the camera.

the eyeviewfinder is in fact a small lcd (no mirrors!), but the resolution is enough for manual focus (you can enlarge the middle of the screen for focussing) - i mostly use the single focus setting anyway.

automatic mode is great, but you can also use the manual mode, which turns the camera in a classic camera, where you can change exposure and aperture manually; you can also set the iso sensitivity from iso80 to iso1600.

i also like the "cascade" shooting, where you can store the last 4 pictures (handy for moving objects).

if you decide to buy this camera, i recommend the following options:
1Gb sandisk compactflash card (450 pictures in normal 9Mpixel mode, 225 in fine 9Mpixel mode, 15 minutes of video (avi format))
4 memorex AA 2500mA rechargable batteries (3 weeks of normal allround use without recharging)


i hope this info helps,
greetz,
trikkke.

User avatar
Skyfighter
Posts: 257
Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: Antwerp (Ekeren)

Post by Skyfighter »

trikkke wrote: i hope this info helps,
:D :D YES IT DOES!!!

THX

User avatar
SilverJET
Posts: 371
Joined: 25 Sep 2003, 00:00
Location: Maasmechelen, Limburg (B)

Post by SilverJET »

maaspotter wrote:
Really I didn't made a mistake for buying the S9500

Hi Skyfighter,

If you go out there and shoot some pictures, can you send me some oriniginal files or something? I'm also thinking about buying a new camera, because I used my old camera (Fuji S304) way to much..

the Fuji S9500 could be a good candidate for replacing my S304 :)

greetz,
rob (robbominaar@hotmail.com)
Hi Rob,

Did you take the pictures on Airliners.net with your Fuji S304 ?
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... entry=true
Best Regards Raymond

pietn
Posts: 172
Joined: 22 Dec 2005, 00:00
Location: Wortegem & Oostende

Post by pietn »

I you wanna have an in-depth review (16 pages), check this out:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilms9000/

greetings, Pietn

User avatar
Skyfighter
Posts: 257
Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: Antwerp (Ekeren)

Post by Skyfighter »

pietn wrote:I you wanna have an in-depth review (16 pages), check this out:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilms9000/
8O NICE!!

maaspotter
Posts: 79
Joined: 18 Oct 2004, 00:00

Post by maaspotter »

Hi Rob,

Did you take the pictures on Airliners.net with your Fuji S304 ?
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... entry=true
yes indeed, they are all taken with the Fuji S304..
Its a nice camera..
But the problem for me is it has only 220mm and 3,2 megapixels, and I'm looking for something bigger now...

omag
Posts: 210
Joined: 10 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: Ruiselede

Post by omag »

SilverJET wrote: I've heard positive things about the Lumix brand. The only negative one is the amount of noise it has. Hope Panasonic can improve that in the future!

Can you post some pictures taken with your camera? And which noise reducer do you use?
Hey Silverjet,

I've posted some shots in this thread a while ago

https://www.aviation24.be/postt16403.html

As a noisefilter I use the neat-filter ( google it), though I'm going to experiment in photoshop too... keep in mind I'm only a beginner at both spotting and editting... :wink:

User avatar
loadmaster747
Posts: 110
Joined: 29 Sep 2005, 00:00
Location: EBLG LGG

Post by loadmaster747 »

Hi Skyfighter,

Did you finally buy the famous camera?
If yes, could you please be so kind to post some pics in order to have an idea of this machine.

Tnks for coop n brgds

Post Reply