SAS upgrading equipment on BRU-CPH

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

Post Reply
User avatar
flywim
Posts: 94
Joined: 01 Aug 2003, 00:00

SAS upgrading equipment on BRU-CPH

Post by flywim »

As of the first of november, Scandinavian Airlines (SK)
will upgrade its equipment to CPH !!

*From that very moment we will see 2 days a week
the A321 instead of the MD-81/82/87 ! :D

Equipment upgrade is on wednesdays and fridays.

Schedule: SK1593 CPH-BRU 15u10-16u40
SK1594 BRU-CPH 17u20-18u55
*And also in the mornings equipment will change:

SK1591/1592 will be operated by a MD-87 instead
of the Dash-8-400

Of course, these upgrades appear after Maersk Air (DM)
decided to stop the CPH-BRU-CPH route

grtz flywim

Devan
Posts: 7
Joined: 09 Oct 2005, 00:00

Post by Devan »

Oh man I was looking for the MD-90...

User avatar
Atlantis
Posts: 5572
Joined: 12 Apr 2005, 00:00

Post by Atlantis »

At least modern equipment from SAS to BRU.

Sorry for those who loved the MD 80/82/87 etc. But I don't like that type of aircraft. It's personel off course.

It's gonne time that we can see an Airbus of SAS at BBU

User avatar
sn26567
Posts: 41171
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: Rosières/Rozieren, Belgium
Contact:

Post by sn26567 »

Atlantis wrote:Sorry for those who loved the MD 80/82/87 etc. But I don't like that type of aircraft. It's personel off course.
Sorry to diisagree, but the MD80 family was very comfortable. The 2-3 seating means that the load factor must be above 80% to have a dreaded middle seat. The rear engines provide for a quiet ride. Unhappy to see them go...
André
ex Sabena #26567

FlightSimCrew
Posts: 203
Joined: 08 Aug 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by FlightSimCrew »

I like the MD series, only petty that they burn so much fuel..makes them an unattractive airplane for start up carriers otherwise we could have seen many more around for years..

B737229
Posts: 1193
Joined: 22 Jun 2003, 00:00

Post by B737229 »

I do agree with sn26567 that the MD80 was great to fly in! Very smoot, stable, and much quiter then the A32x series. I often flew the MD8x's and was always a pleasant experience!

Apuneger
Posts: 730
Joined: 20 Sep 2002, 00:00
Location: Mechelen
Contact:

Post by Apuneger »

FYI, SK1594 was operated by a 737 today.

Greets,
Ivan
It's not good when it's done, it's done when it's good...
---
Facebook | Twitter | Flickr

User avatar
flywim
Posts: 94
Joined: 01 Aug 2003, 00:00

Post by flywim »

yes, indeed.

SAS has a very good passenger load on the BRU-CPH.
Evening flights are always full, especially
the SK1594 flight which is almost everyday
completely full,or even overbooked.
Also SK1590 to ARN is a success (always full or overbooked)
and in the weekends every flight is full, not an empty seat
to discover

flywim

C_J
Posts: 498
Joined: 23 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: BRU

Post by C_J »

Good news!
The MD-80 is a good plane, but it starts to show signs of her age, certainly those of Alitalia.

bigjulie

Post by bigjulie »

I flew on a SK MD80 from FRA to OSL in 2003; it was very quiet in the cabin compared to other 'planes :laugh:

Airbus320redcap
Posts: 15
Joined: 05 Aug 2005, 00:00
Location: Sint-Truiden

Post by Airbus320redcap »

bigjulie wrote:I flew on a SK MD80 from FRA to OSL in 2003; it was very quiet in the cabin compared to other 'planes :laugh:
I suppose you were sitting in the front :lol:

Remember that the engines are next to the windows in the back :wink:

bigjulie

Post by bigjulie »

No I was sitting in Seat 21C, according to my boarding pass, which is in line with the wings :laugh:

Post Reply