Pictures Silverback DC-8 impounded at EBBR
Moderator: Latest news team
-
Allnipponairways
- Posts: 360
- Joined: 17 Oct 2003, 00:00
- Location: japan & Belgium
AN124, about Kalitta Air: they've been on the IVW list "verscherpt toezicht" for quite a while (don't know how long), and trust you agree that is more then "some more inspections". Don't you agree "red alert" is a good translation?
http://www.ivw.nl/nl/actueel/verscherpt ... tstaan.jsp
IVW (Dutch CAA): "Ook Air Bangladesh en Kalitta Air (een Amerikaanse vrachtchartermaatschappij) hebben enige tijd onder verscherpt toezicht gestaan, maar die status is opgeheven nadat door de Inspectie Verkeer en Waterstaat is geconstateerd dat beide luchtvaartmaatschappijen de naleving van veiligheidsvoorschriften hebben verbeterd."
http://www.ivw.nl/nl/actueel/verscherpt ... tstaan.jsp
IVW (Dutch CAA): "Ook Air Bangladesh en Kalitta Air (een Amerikaanse vrachtchartermaatschappij) hebben enige tijd onder verscherpt toezicht gestaan, maar die status is opgeheven nadat door de Inspectie Verkeer en Waterstaat is geconstateerd dat beide luchtvaartmaatschappijen de naleving van veiligheidsvoorschriften hebben verbeterd."
- Bruspotter
- Posts: 2068
- Joined: 04 Sep 2004, 00:00
- Location: (Antwerp/Belgium)
- Contact:
I don't know how many you consider a lot but AMS and BRU seem to be doing fine despite their grounded aircraftairports with lots of stranded/grounded broken or illegal aircrafts , don't attract much new airlines...they distract them...it just isn't good commercial.
BTW Silverback is still wellcome in The Netherlands..
How many exactly?Now that was a joke no offense intended personaly i would hate having a graveyard airport but the way BRU has a few impounded aircraft now and it could keep growing in number untill it really is.
BTW those in The Netherlands probably remember the good old ZAS B707 which was grounded at AMS back in the 80s due to severe maintenence issues (was grounded for years). Compared to that aircraft this one looks "new".
-
Airbus380technician
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 31 Aug 2005, 00:00
I don't understand why this airline is still welcome at AMS????
I saw this A/C and indeed 4 tyres out of limit + 3 brakes more then flush + fuel leaks all around (even just after exhaust of engine 4) + traces of oil in engine 4 under fan blades +.....
Just amazing......
Somebody knows that A/C is allready left BRU?
I saw it 3 weeks ago for the last time at the cargo places and then BCAA grounded the A/C.
I saw this A/C and indeed 4 tyres out of limit + 3 brakes more then flush + fuel leaks all around (even just after exhaust of engine 4) + traces of oil in engine 4 under fan blades +.....
Just amazing......
Somebody knows that A/C is allready left BRU?
I saw it 3 weeks ago for the last time at the cargo places and then BCAA grounded the A/C.
-
TCAS_climb
- Posts: 413
- Joined: 04 Jan 2004, 00:00
Seriously doubt this DC8 will ever leave the airport in one piece.
Rumors spread fast but I guess your national authority already realized a few odd things:
# malfunctions not written in tech log
# 'no go' items disregarded
# some of the pilots not even type rated on DC8
# no Rwanda Civil Aviation Authority oversight on the operation
Silverjunk leased the aircraft at a rate that does not even cover normal maintenance costs which means that they probably have a few cents left in their pocket (no maintenance done, since too expensive) but they won't use it to get their aircraft back.
It's going nowhere.
Cut it into pieces, sell the aluminium and titanium, then the airport authority might get some money back for the parking fees.
Rumors spread fast but I guess your national authority already realized a few odd things:
# malfunctions not written in tech log
# 'no go' items disregarded
# some of the pilots not even type rated on DC8
# no Rwanda Civil Aviation Authority oversight on the operation
Silverjunk leased the aircraft at a rate that does not even cover normal maintenance costs which means that they probably have a few cents left in their pocket (no maintenance done, since too expensive) but they won't use it to get their aircraft back.
It's going nowhere.
Cut it into pieces, sell the aluminium and titanium, then the airport authority might get some money back for the parking fees.
-
TCAS_climb
- Posts: 413
- Joined: 04 Jan 2004, 00:00
Euh ... on some of the brakes there where no brake wear pins anymore, because the brake pads are completely gone almost , normally we replace brakes when the wear pin is flush and the brake is already monitored as the wear pin is less than 5 mm.HorsePower wrote:Many thanks bilboone for "the scoop"!
I'm not able to see the brakes wear witness but my bet is it's all the same!
Seb.
PS: What a pity you didn't took pictures of the logbook...
I had a look in the tech logbook, and there is almost nothing noted after the flights, only when they write in the book brake or tire e.g. 3 worn , then they will replace it , but during daily inspections and normal planned maintenance, I suspect they only replace it when it is completely over the limits and even further.....
I totally agree !AN124 wrote:@ Bruspotter:
Could you please stop spreading rumours like banning SQ and CX cargo from Brussels.
As you already said this is a rumour and they generally don't havy any reliable source.
This is not only bad publicity for the airport but also for the airlines.
SQ is a very respected airline throughout the whole world just as CX.
And regarding to Kalitta, yes they had some extra inspection but things are cleared up around this airline and they are still permitted in every country, so also this is not true.
Admins: sorryfor going off topic but I think that these kind of rumours don't belong here.
Greetings,
Yvo
Greetz,
Don't dream your life, live your dream !!!
-
realplaneshaveprops
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00
-
realplaneshaveprops
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00
- Airbus330lover
- Posts: 889
- Joined: 21 Jul 2005, 00:00
- Location: Rixensart