What do you think of the AVRO?
Moderator: Latest news team
-
HorsePower
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: 12 Jan 2005, 00:00
- Location: France
-
Fiero
B737229 wrote:Isn't this because of the loss of hydraulic pressure the brakes may open, when on the ground?Ovostar wrote: Someone asks an interesting question under one of the pictures: The Speed Brake unit. Why do Airlines always deploy the brake while parked?
The speed brake doesn't open on ground normally because it is equipped with a locking system. But after a couple of years those locks get damaged and it isn't that important to replace it. So it hasn't got anything to do with the brakes. And during the flight it's hydraulically closed so failsafe
-
Fiero
The actual frame of the airplane is the same.
But the engine's are FADEC controlled. The cockpit is a little bit different. An animal bay was also introduces. Water servicing panel on the L/H side instead of being a part of the hydraulic bay. The cabin that's a bit different.
DFGS and autothrottle. Those are about the most important differences.
Greetz
But the engine's are FADEC controlled. The cockpit is a little bit different. An animal bay was also introduces. Water servicing panel on the L/H side instead of being a part of the hydraulic bay. The cabin that's a bit different.
DFGS and autothrottle. Those are about the most important differences.
Greetz
-
realplaneshaveprops
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00
I like the Avro, although it's not sexy, sleek, fast or beautifull, it gets the job done & that is what matters the most to an airline, i guess.
I think the name AVRO comes from the English aviation pioneer A. V. Roe.
the name got changed at some point in time to BAe, but nostalgia won it some point and they changed it back...
I think the name AVRO comes from the English aviation pioneer A. V. Roe.
the name got changed at some point in time to BAe, but nostalgia won it some point and they changed it back...
-
HorsePower
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: 12 Jan 2005, 00:00
- Location: France
Just flew them the first time this weekend. It is quite a funny airplane. 2+3 seating was OK, not narrow at all though I can't imagine 3+3 seating in this narrow body aircraft. Maybe the SNBA leather seats make it more comfortable.
I like the fact that the wing is located on top of the fuselage. Seated at the window one can admire all the things happening during take off and landing.
I also liked the fact that it has build in staircases. We didn't have to wait to long and could just walk on the tarmac by using the small staircase.
It is a bit noisy but not to much of a problem I think and the overhead bins at the wing locations are just too small. Only a laptop case fits in it.
I d love to fly them again.
I like the fact that the wing is located on top of the fuselage. Seated at the window one can admire all the things happening during take off and landing.
I also liked the fact that it has build in staircases. We didn't have to wait to long and could just walk on the tarmac by using the small staircase.
It is a bit noisy but not to much of a problem I think and the overhead bins at the wing locations are just too small. Only a laptop case fits in it.
I d love to fly them again.