Aviation24.be

Ah yeah i missed that trick, 2 differents entities.


Yeah, the same trick used to stall BHV for ever. Even the Ménapiens can get angry once in a while.
And this has been part of the hidden agenda:
De cargoluchthaven van Luik hoopt munt te slaan uit de verstrengde geluidsnormen voor Brussels ...

Imho, both parties to the dispute have valid arguments, although one party has more legal arguments on its side. "Celine Fremaut wants to be re-elected" (says Korvo), Ben Weyts, too. And since the federal minister apparently has no competence, we are in a stalemate.
I'll refrain from any other ...

Imho, both parties to the dispute have valid arguments, although one party has more legal arguments on its side. "Celine Fremaut wants to be re-elected" (says Korvo), Ben Weyts, too. And since the federal minister apparently has no competence, we are in a stalemate.
I'll refrain from any other ...

"Needs to be forced": wrong. There is no need to force whatever. There is a much easier solution: the Brussels Government accepts the inviation from Flanders and the airport to talk about noise restrictions and a dispertion plan. And meanwhile, the Brussels Government orders their incasso firm not ...

What a pathetic answer.
BRU is the NATIONAL airport of belgium, remember ?
And if a limit needs to be forced, any other national airport should be prefered. (Even though I dont beleive airlines will like that solution)

Of course it would be easier if BRU was part of brussels territory or if the ...

http://mobile.lesoir.be/1440529/article/economie/2017-02-15/vols-nuit-l-aeroport-liege-se-propose-comme-solution-pour-bruxelles

That is a part of the solution Liege proposition to take over all the difficult flights ..
They can do it because they invested 500 million euros to make it possible ...

Brussels airlines; TUI, Ryanair affected as well:

http://www.tijd.be/ondernemen/luchtvaar ... 1486117048

This is getting absurd ...

The fact that they come from different regions is almost secondary here...
(Groen is on brussels side for example)

This is a typical communautarian discussion and a classic example of "Flanders-bashing". If the airport were located on Brussels territory, all aircraft would be flying over ...

That's indeed correct: noise restrictions are regional. However, most (but not all) courts accept the principe " lex specialis derogat legi generali ": a specialized law prevails to a general law. A new federal aviation law would then prevail to the existing general Brussels environmental law ...

This begins to smell like total sabotage by the PS/Défi, who see BRU as a "Flemish" airport in which they have no interest:
" Het is zover gekomen dat Brussel zelfs niet meer wil overleggen. Ze zeggen gewoon dat het gaan doen "
http://deredactie.be/cm/vrtnieuws/politiek/1.2874369
It is up to the ...

Déjà-vu: Birdy/VG-airlines
I wouldn't be surprised.

FLYAIR10 wrote: And what about the waste-water coming from Brussels through the Zenne these days? Is this clean now? is it in line with the EU-norms on river-pollution? If not,extra taxes should be imposed on 'RégionBruxelles-capitale'.

Excellent idea!

Didymus wrote: There's no hope for any political solution, I'm afraid.

If there's no hope for a political solution, we should just "invent" some nuisance taxations for Brussels ourselves. Maybe a compensation-tax for every passenger originating from Brussels.

Didier Gosuin is a member of défi (the ex-FDF), and the airport is on the territory of Flanders. This is simple economical sabotage and harassment, fueled by his anti-Flemish sentiments. It's a pity that people like Gosuin can't be put on a passenger black list ...