ex OO-SCX is flying again

Skystef · Post by **Skystef** » 03 Aug 2003, 17:25

Yep, after been stored for more than 1,5 years in BRU, this bird is singing again in nice colors as f-ohlp
Is this bird gonna find its home again? Lets hope & pray for... :jumpy:

SkyStef

liebensd · Post by **liebensd** » 03 Aug 2003, 18:08

Will Ex Sabena OO-SCX c/n 22! still wear F-OHLP registrations in the future or will it be reregistered as a JY-xxx from Jordan?

Greetz,

Dave

vliegtuigfreak · Post by **vliegtuigfreak** » 03 Aug 2003, 20:10

Another thing, why buy SNBA not A340's? Its good for long-haul routes i think.

Greetingzz
Sonny

Post by **luchtzak** » 03 Aug 2003, 20:28

An A330 is much better in performance than an A340! And it has only 2 engines, so cheaper than 4 !

ciao,

Bart
:rock:

liebensd · Post by **liebensd** » 03 Aug 2003, 20:34

Vliegtuigfreak,

You need a lot of pax to fly on these routes.

Greetz,

Dave

vliegtuigfreak · Post by **vliegtuigfreak** » 03 Aug 2003, 20:51

luchtzak wrote:An A330 is much better in performance than an A340! And it has only 2 engines, so cheaper than 4 !

Indeed Bart, less fuel, less costs. But why SNBA is buying no A330-200s they can fly further then the A330-300!

Greetingzz
Sonny

liebensd · Post by **liebensd** » 03 Aug 2003, 20:59

Vliegtuigfreak

I do not want to disappoint you but, for operating more and new aircrafts you need two thing money and passengers and that is a general problem in aviation industry at this moment.

Greetz,

Dave

Skystef · Post by **Skystef** » 03 Aug 2003, 21:12

liebensd wrote:Will Ex Sabena OO-SCX c/n 22! still wear F-OHLP registrations in the future or will it be reregistered as a JY-xxx from Jordan?

According to JP 2003/2004 they should receive an JY-xxx registration, however no timing available.

SkyStef

Avro · Post by **Avro** » 03 Aug 2003, 21:15

Why are some of Royal Jordanian's aircrafts registred in France

Is it an economical thing or not

greetz
Chris

liebensd · Post by **liebensd** » 03 Aug 2003, 21:17

Wasn't that not also with the aircrafts of Khalifa?

Greetz,

Dave

vliegtuigfreak · Post by **vliegtuigfreak** » 03 Aug 2003, 21:37

liebensd wrote:I do not want to disappoint you but, for operating more and new aircrafts you need two thing money and passengers and that is a general problem in aviation industry at this moment.

Yeah, hard times, sure with 11september in your head, many passengers not trust the plane anymore. I hope there are no wackos anymore that do such a stopid things for there big god "Allah". They do everything for him!
It are crazy people.

Greetingzz
Sonny

Sabena_690 · Post by **Sabena_690** » 03 Aug 2003, 22:15

Sonny, I don't want to go off topic, but can you please make the difference between the terrorists who use God to justifie their actions, just as cowboy Bush uses God to 'bless America'?

The Islam is a VERY tolerable religion, in certain aspects even more tolerable than the Christs.

So don't make the mistake that a lot of people make (generalize the fundamentalistic terrorists to the whole Islam).

About the topic, the same question over here: why keep several aircrafts their French registration?

Not only the A342, but also several A310's of RJ have a French registration. The same for Volare, Khaliffa, ...

Regards
Frederic

Post by **sn26567** » 04 Aug 2003, 09:18

Avro wrote:Why are some of Royal Jordanian's aircrafts registred in France

Did OO-SCX not get a French registration when it was transfered to France for temporary storage? And then it kept its registration for a while because some countries take a LOT of time to register them in their books.

Skystef · Post by **Skystef** » 04 Aug 2003, 12:46

sn26567 wrote:Did OO-SCX not get a French registration when it was transfered to France for temporary storage?

Inderdeed André, just before it wore an "F-WQRG" regi, but those F-WQxx regis r only used for ferry flights and/or storage i think.

SkyStef