Flanker wrote:I think that you know very well what I accuse you of.
Firstly, how can I know?
I am nothing but a drunk man, intellectually unable to understand your enlightened posts, right?
Secondly, accusing people is not what this forum is about; we are here to discuss the posts, not the people making them, a distinction you fail to make.
flanker wrote:In many of your posts, you develop your idea's in a very confusing way and come to very irrational conclusions. This breaks the discussion and forces me to write hundreds of lines to try to rectify your analysis.
Nobody is forcing you to do anything at all and in fact it would be very sobering for your inflated self esteem if you'd start to get to grips with the reality of it all, which is that obviously nobody is waiting for any of your rectifications either....
I think I express my opinion in a respectful way (and clearly the moderators think so too) and I expect the very same from people willing to reply,whether they agree with what I write or not.
flanker wrote:That's why your analysis deserved to be called drunk.
May I point out you are not called upon to judge on other people's post as you are but an ordinary member to this forum, just like me. Clearly you haven't understood your place here and think of yourself as being entitled to more privileges that others, despite repeated efforts by the moderators to make it clear to you you should start to behave properly, or risk a permanent ban...
flanker wrote:I used the word drunk to see if the moderators were monitoring the discussion at all, and this resulting in a deletion of that post, proved to me that there is clearly a double standard.
So whenever you don't agree with some of what you read here, you feel you should be automatically entitled to outright insults of the poster too, as part of your reply?
Besides, it probably takes a bigger brain to grasp your concept, but to me it looks irrational to be willing to test the neutrality of the moderators that way and be genuinely surprised with the outcome, which was a post deletion and a permanent ban warning?
flanker wrote:The last time that I was banned is because I replicated your way of running away from the heat: develop entire texts of full nonsense that looked like they made sense, in order to break the conversation. Might I add, I had everyone confused for a week or so.
If it truely makes you happy believing so, then please do....
I do wonder however what kind of an achievement causing shortlived confusion would be, since you are clearly very proud of it?