Flanker wrote:Your theory is interesting but it doesn't hold.
The weird thing is, I didn't even put forward any theory at all; you did!
Remember it was YOU who came up with some out of context raw data from the annual report of Lufthansa as proof of a some rather naive statement to conclude that first post of yours with, something I tried to check by analytical quantification of the potential profit on the extra revenues generated since lufthansa took an equity stake in B.air and I think I managed to disprove you statement fairly well by simply analysing the data you've provided yourself. Mind you, note how I only touched one side of the equation so far: the other one (i.e. the albeit smaller reverse cash flow from LH to SN) was kept out, and that was actually still in your favour then, yet even without this side of the equation, it's clear you have no case to make!
And then, rather than accept the conclusion or debate it in an intellectual way with more facts and figures, something utterly strange happened of which I am still wondering what it is all about: you suddenly started asking all sort of completely unrelated and often even totally incomprehensible and poorly phrased questions, after which you basically started arguing with those very same questions you first put forward yourself, as if somehow I asked you any of those questions????
I hope you dont mind me asking, but is there some medical problem with you, maybe?
I know that if somebody in my family would start behaving as you did there, right in the middle of a rather "normal" discussion, I'd be very worried about his mental state.
Or is the claim by others true: that each time you loose a discussion, you immediately try to turn the topic and if the other party doesn't play along with this trick by ignoring all of your sidesteps and simply focussing on the essence of the discussion, you simply clutter the page with total and complete nonsense, hoping everybody wil just give in in total despair and thus not read anymore how you were shown wrong?
Just to summarise: YOU came with an accusation which I managed fairly easy to disprove; never during this discussion have I presented any single theory of mine, nor have I made any comment related to fleet composition, routes or strategies...I sticked to YOUR facts... And your fact alone.... And you.... Well, you seem to be just talking incomprehensible nonsense in response ever since.