travellover wrote: can't wait to watch SN A330-200 to/at JFK, joining the entire world on that particular airport again.
Not so minimalistic...it will be an A333
Moderator: Latest news team
travellover wrote: can't wait to watch SN A330-200 to/at JFK, joining the entire world on that particular airport again.
Again I'm happy that someone working for SN, is actively on this forum to respond in a proper way.
They tried the famous Greek Cure...austerity,sometimes,when you go to the B Terminal,you cannot find any Bruair Staff...but in the B house,plenty of managers are having a coffee!!!
Flanker wrote:Instead of having one guy wasting his time on luchtzak.be, they could hire an additional programmer who would detect and repair the issues on their website.
airazurxtror wrote: try to book one of those 99 euros flights in promotion, and you'll end up completely exasperated - and more often than not : without a reservation!
According th FlightRadar, both OO-SFM and OO-SFV (the A333's with the refurbished interior) are in Malta right now...
They'll have to return soon if they want to be in time for the start of the operations...
pijaleu wrote:According th FlightRadar, both OO-SFM and OO-SFV (the A333's with the refurbished interior) are in Malta right now...
They'll have to return soon if they want to be in time for the start of the operations...
OO-SFM is coming back today at (STA) 15.45, so well in time for JFK-flights.
Didn't OO-SFV return yesterday?
Duke wrote:Why did OO-SFV fly back to Malta (I thought it was already refurbished?)
Inquirer wrote:Anybody has on topic information on loads and if any personalities will be present to inaugurate the first flight to JFK or if other things are planned to accompany the launch? Previously, somebody mentioned new uniforms for cabin crew, but I haven't read anything about this?
airazurxtror wrote:As I suspected, I am not bright enough to book on Brussels Airlines ...
Fortunately, most of the other airlines keep their website fit to use by stupid people like me - otherwise, I would have to stay home !
(Actually, one can do quite nicely without Brussels Airlines).
airazurxtror wrote:As I suspected, I am not bright enough to book on Brussels Airlines ...
Fortunately, most of the other airlines keep their website fit to use by stupid people like me - otherwise, I would have to stay home !
(Actually, one can do quite nicely without Brussels Airlines).
convair wrote:Now, we were told that the NYC flight was set up mostly in order to maximize trafic between the US and Africa (on SN of course). For the african traveler, wouldn't the next step be a non-stop flight NYC to, say, Kinshasa? And I assume SN would not be allowed to operate such route...(even in code-share with Korongo?and btw how are they doing?).
convair wrote:For the african traveler, wouldn't the next step be a non-stop flight NYC to, say, Kinshasa?
tolipanebas wrote:
Now, do I need to spell out in which category the key African destinations of SN fall?
Return to Latest aviation news
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 26 guests