Modifications to Bertje's dispersion plan

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

killerwhale65
Posts: 1455
Joined: 08 Aug 2003, 00:00
Location: Deinze, Belgium
Contact:

Post by killerwhale65 »

hi,

the rway usage at BRU is still not available nowhere. Lot of people have asked for it already, some people have already sent mails to BIAC and such, but for now you will heve to learn and predict with the metar. It works pretty fine for me. Of course with the changes from the dispertion plan it hasnt become easier.
Matthias Thoen
MicroWings - Aviation Hobby Store

User avatar
blackhawk
Posts: 1595
Joined: 20 Sep 2003, 00:00
Location: Leuven

Post by blackhawk »

Maybe a good tool is teletekst? http://193.121.55.225/tt/tt.php?p=308&g=1&s=1&r=1&x=1

Ukkel is not that far away from BRU so it is easy: atm, winds are comming from the Z (south) at 11 km / h or 6 knots < 15 knots max crosswinds or 27km/h. So at the moment, there is a big possibility that the dispertion plan is active.

Have a nic day, Michaël

killerwhale65
Posts: 1455
Joined: 08 Aug 2003, 00:00
Location: Deinze, Belgium
Contact:

Post by killerwhale65 »

why make it so difficult? Just look up the current metar for EBBR (for example here: http://www.piloten.be/cgi-bin/meteo/wea ... rport=ebbr)

Dispertionplan is indeed active, but for weekdays it just means 25R&L so nothing special. Its only in the weekend that it slightly differs, and of course at night but i dont think many people will go spotting then ;-)
Matthias Thoen
MicroWings - Aviation Hobby Store

User avatar
Avro
Posts: 8856
Joined: 28 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Avro »

Thx for your comment dolfke. I didn't knew that the dispertion plan would cause that much trouble to airlines :?

Chris

website-info
Posts: 750
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 00:00

Post by website-info »

I think i't's about time that the airlines took the plan to court, if extra flying is needed = extra cost, if flights are delayed = extra cost and if the cockpit crews have no idea which runway will be in use on their arrival this could create real problems with fuel shortages and declared emergencies for this reason. OR the crews have to upload extra fuel (= extra cost) just in case of a runway change and carrying extra fuel costs fuel = extra cost.

There are two reports recently published that actually put a € cost on delays, mianly for ATC but you can get some idea of the costs involved. One of the reports actaully gives a per minute cost of €71 for flights delayed greater than 15 mins, do the figures

1 flight delayed 30 mins = €2130
10 flights = €21300
35 flights (as it was the other day in BRU because of the plan) = €74550 perhaps the airlines should go to court to recover these costs.....

just my thoughts ....
Rgds
Tony

Jense

Post by Jense »

A little question; (but off-topic)
Today (21/04) the winds are from the south, so... can someone say wich runway will be in use? The previous times rwy 20 was used when winds were Southely...

greettzzz

arthurv
Posts: 68
Joined: 15 May 2003, 00:00
Location: Bonheiden

Post by arthurv »

Jense wrote:A little question; (but off-topic)
Today (21/04) the winds are from the south, so... can someone say wich runway will be in use? The previous times rwy 20 was used when winds were Southely...

greettzzz
Here's the latest EBBR arrival information (10u26 local time) picked up by my scanner on 132.475 just a few minutes ago:

Code: Select all

Brussels National arrival 0828 Juliet 
expect verctoring for ILS approach
rwy 25L for arrival
transition level 55
rwy 25R for departure
winds 210 degrees, 10 knots
visibility 10 km or more
clouds few at 1200 feet, scattered at 3300 feet, broken at 5000 feet 
temperature 13
dewpoint 10
QNH 1012
no significant weather
This is the kind of information that I'd love to see online somewhere...

killerwhale65
Posts: 1455
Joined: 08 Aug 2003, 00:00
Location: Deinze, Belgium
Contact:

Post by killerwhale65 »

25 is used here because:

1. only 10 knots windspeed, while 15kts is allowed with dry weather
2. 210 isnt realy 100% crosswind anymore for 25
3. dispertionplan states usage of 25 today during day
Matthias Thoen
MicroWings - Aviation Hobby Store

Falcon7X
Posts: 5
Joined: 20 Apr 2004, 00:00

Post by Falcon7X »

To come back on the study made by the French expert. It seems to me that it's only concerning the risk for the people on the ground outside the airport area. I find it very logic that since there are fewer planes flying over a certain area, the risk to get a plane on your head in that area is smaller. The smaller the concentration, the smaller the risk. It seems that the Belgian government has again spend a lot of money on a silly study, which is in fact a simpel maths exercise.
I would like to see a study on the risk to the aircraft (and therefore the crew and the passengers) to be involved, just before or after take off or landing, due to the new procedures imposed by the dispertion plan.

regards

Falcon7x

User avatar
sn26567
Posts: 40838
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: Rosières/Rozieren, Belgium
Contact:

Post by sn26567 »

Excellent comments, Falcon7X.

And welcome to Luchtzak!
André
ex Sabena #26567

User avatar
Avro
Posts: 8856
Joined: 28 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Avro »

I totally agree with you Falcon7X !! and welcome to Luchtzak :P


Chris

Jense

Post by Jense »

If the Luchtzak-members should be in the government... :wink:
Don't forget; if (stupid :?:)Mrs. Durant did not begin the discussion about the night-flights, there was not talking about a "dispertionplan" :!:
Off-topic; saturday are winds northley (02 :D) and temperatures about 17° 8)
Someone interested in spotting? 8) :?: :lol:

greettzzz

User avatar
sn26567
Posts: 40838
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: Rosières/Rozieren, Belgium
Contact:

Post by sn26567 »

Jense wrote:Don't forget; if (stupid :?:)Mrs. Durant did not begin the discussion about the night-flights, there was not talking about a "dispersion plan" :!:
The issue was not raised by Isabelita Durant, but by the inhabitants of the "Noordrand", who introduced a complaint before the court. Later, in 2002, the court of appeals decided that the burden of noise had to be equally shared between all the neighbours of the airport. Hence, the government (represented by Isabelita, Minister of Transport) had to take a decision and that's when the fun :cry: started.

Since then, the decision of the court of appeals has been repelled, but the dispersion plan remained :(

When will the government take the only wise decision? (Should I remind everybody what the most sensible decision is? Drop me a message!)
André
ex Sabena #26567

killerwhale65
Posts: 1455
Joined: 08 Aug 2003, 00:00
Location: Deinze, Belgium
Contact:

Post by killerwhale65 »

Jense wrote:Off-topic; saturday are winds northley (02 :D) and temperatures about 17° 8)
Someone interested in spotting? 8) :?: :lol:

greettzzz
always 02 on saturdays in the dispertion plan :!:
Matthias Thoen
MicroWings - Aviation Hobby Store

Post Reply