Rejected for guns, pilots critisize test

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

Post Reply
C-117
Posts: 147
Joined: 24 Sep 2003, 00:00
Location: Kyiv, UKRAINE

Rejected for guns, pilots critisize test

Post by C-117 »

U.S. pilots already trained to carry guns and operate sophisticated weapons systems are among 100 applicants rejected from a federal program to arm flight-deck officers to protect aircraft from terrorist attacks.
Former police officers, firearms instructors and military pilots have
filed written complaints with the Federal Flight Deck Officers (FFDO)
program questioning its psychological- and background-test system, as well as its generic rejection letter that doesn't explain an applicant's
purported shortcomings.
One pilot, a retired Air Force colonel and fighter wing commander
responsible for multimillion-dollar jet fighters, said he was allowed to
carry his pistol aboard military aircraft.
"The USAF considered me psychologically sound enough to be directly
responsible for nuclear weapons," the pilot wrote. "Yet a TSA psychologist
has determined I am unreliable to carry a weapon in my own airliner."
TSA spokesman Nico Melendez said the program's psychological- and
background-test system "is the most fair kind of system that we could put in place to qualify as many as possible."
"It's important to arm pilots to protect the flight deck," he said.
The program's rejection letter says: "Based on TSA's evaluation during
the selection process, you currently do not meet the criteria for
participation in the FFDO program."
The unexplained rejections, gun-handling rules pilots say threaten
security, and the declining number of pilots now willing to participate in
the program have several members of Congress drafting legislation to
eliminate "roadblocks" they say the Transportation Security Administration
(TSA) has created.
"We are talking about professionals here, but it's just been roadblock
after roadblock at TSA. The only thing I can think of is, it's a liberal,
knee-jerk reaction to guns," said Rep. Joe Wilson, South Carolina
Republican.
Sen. Jim Bunning, Kentucky Republican, said legislation he and Mr.
Wilson are drafting will force TSA to implement the program as it was
originally intended by Congress.
"Despite the urgency of this initiative to enhance our homeland defense,
only a fraction of our 100,000 pilots have been armed so far. This will
ensure that all pilots who have volunteered for this program can be trained
and armed as soon as possible in order to defend the cockpit from terrorist thugs," Mr. Bunning said.
The FFDO program was established after the September 11 terrorist
attacks and TSA officials say "hundreds" of pilots have completed the
one-week training program since it began in April.
Mr. Melendez acknowledged there have been complaints that pilots are not being qualified fast enough, but said the agency has doubled the number of classes this year.
"You can't federalize the pilots they would like federalized in nine
months, but we are working very hard," Mr. Melendez said.
David Mackett, president of the Airline Pilots Security Alliance, said
his organization solicited volunteers for the program and 40,000 pilots
asked to join, but only about 15 percent, or 6,000, actually enrolled.
Mr. Mackett and several pilots say officers are abandoning the program
because of rules that require them to carry guns in lockboxes at all times
instead of in shoulder holsters, and the weapons cannot be accessed until
they are behind reinforced cockpit doors. They say the procedures make the flight deck vulnerable to attack every time the cockpit door is open.
As for the program's screening process, one pilot, who spoke on the
condition of anonymity, said the psychological evaluation assumes all pilots are "drunken wife-beaters."
Mr. Wilson said the evaluations are "just insulting" and one of many
regulations designed as "a series of roadblocks to block it from becoming
effective."

Post Reply