Load factors on trans Atlantic flighs from bru

Share your experiences about your latest flights: details and pictures are highly appreciated by our community. How do you rate airlines, in-flight meals, frequent flyer programs, etc... join this forum now!
Post Reply
ttubbie
Posts: 25
Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 00:00

Load factors on trans Atlantic flighs from bru

Post by ttubbie »

How are the American airlines serving BRU doing ? It seems that Continental is practically flying full planes every day, judging by their seat preview on their website. How are American, United and Delta doing ?

Title edited by Liebensd: don't use capital characters in title

User avatar
Knight255
Posts: 741
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 00:00
Location: Daytona Beach, USA

Post by Knight255 »

LOAD FACTOR
SYSTEM 73.3 % 68.9 % 4.4 Pts
D.O.T. DOMESTIC 73.2 67.5 5.7
INTERNATIONAL 73.5 72.1 1.4
ATLANTIC 73.7 72.5 1.2
LATIN AMERICA 72.7 70.7 2.0
PACIFIC 77 79 (2.0)
This is from American's website. Atlantic load factor up 1.2% from last January. I haven't the foggiest idea whether the increase in passenger traffic was to/from London (American's most served European city) or any other European city.
"What's this button do?? I don't know, push it and find out................."

User avatar
TWA
Posts: 606
Joined: 04 Oct 2003, 00:00
Location: Thalahassee, FL -- Sint-Truiden, BE
Contact:

Post by TWA »

I can't wait for bigger equipment to arrive in BRU. Who will start the first 777 service to NY: AA, CO or DL ????

User avatar
Knight255
Posts: 741
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 00:00
Location: Daytona Beach, USA

Post by Knight255 »

AA has a pretty big 777 fleet, over 40 I believe. However, some of those planes will be used for their new China route.
"What's this button do?? I don't know, push it and find out................."

JetB
Posts: 651
Joined: 25 Sep 2003, 00:00

Post by JetB »

For low season CO is doing the best, and flying with the biggest equipment. Occupancy between 80 and 100 % every day !.

Weekends are good for all airline, Occupancy between 70 and 100 %.

During the week, DL JFK service is doing extremely bad, between 50 and 70 pax !.
The problem started for DL when AA started flying to JFK from BRU.

AA Chicago is going good between 85 and 100 pax. But AA JFK has its ups and downs, between 65 and 90 pax.

The only real problem route is DL JFK.
DL is lucky to have so many transfer passengers from Israel, without that the route would be lost.

AFApresident
Posts: 371
Joined: 01 Jun 2004, 00:00
Contact:

Post by AFApresident »

During the week, DL JFK service is doing extremely bad, between 50 and 70 pax !.
The problem started for DL when AA started flying to JFK from BRU.

AA Chicago is going good between 85 and 100 pax. But AA JFK has its ups and downs, between 65 and 90 pax.

Uh that´s like 30-50% :roll: , not a lot so a 777 will be most unlikely except maybe for CO in the 'far' future.

MSS658
Posts: 555
Joined: 14 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: Maarkedal,Belguim

Post by MSS658 »

how is DL-ATL and UA doing

JetB
Posts: 651
Joined: 25 Sep 2003, 00:00

Post by JetB »

DL ATL weekdays 120 - 150 pax and weekends a little more.

UA 150 -170 pax, weekdays and weekends.

MSS658
Posts: 555
Joined: 14 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: Maarkedal,Belguim

Post by MSS658 »

yhank you

waldova
Posts: 731
Joined: 21 Aug 2004, 00:00

Post by waldova »

It is so strange that one airline can perform so much better than an other airline on the same route. Anyway to go to New York, flying to Newark is much easier. You can get much faster into the city. I guess that is why CO is doing so good as they are the only one flying to newark from Brussels.

Post Reply